道路交通事故处理警务模式之完善

我国交通事故处理存在着处理质量不高、公信力不强的情况，其原因在于其警务模式不能适应当前专业化的要求。建立专门的事故处理机构，完善事故认定监督，改进事故处理备勤制度，改善待遇稳定处理人员队伍，引进激励机制促进积极性，完善培训学习制度以图从根本上提高交通事故处理的质量。     

Predictive crime mapping

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) have emerged as a key tool in intelligence-led policing and spatial predictions of crime are being used by many police services to reduce crime. Break and entries (BNEs) are one of the most patterned and predictable crime types, and may be particularly amendable to predictive crime mapping. A pilot project was conducted to spatially predict BNEs and property crime in Vancouver, Canada. Using detailed data collected by the Vancouver Police Department on where and when observed crimes occur, the statistical model was able to predict future BNEs for residential and commercial locations. Ideally implemented within a mobile GIS, the automated model provides continually updated predictive maps and may assist patrol units in self-deployment decisions. Future research is required to overcome computational and statistical limitations, and to preform model validation.     

当前警务改革现实问题与改革路径探究

当前,我国警务改革面临警力编制少,警力资源配置失衡,机关化倾向突出,警务机制运行不畅等现实问题。对此,本文提出如下建议：扎实做好基层基础工作创新,着力破解＂警力不足＂的难题;推进管理机制创新,破解＂机制不畅＂难题;推进科学技术创新,挑战＂技术手段滞后＂难题;提高打防工作创新,破解＂形势考验＂难题。     

试论人民警察职业道德建设中的道德两难问题

人民警察职业道德中的道德两难问题,主要有执法制度化与人性化的抉择、警察公权力与私权利的抉择、警察法定职责与社会角色泛化的抉择。究其原因,主要在于外部社会环境的复杂性、内部组织管理的缺陷及个体执法素质因素三个方面。解决道德两难问题,必须以法律为底线,具体对策包括推动法律与道德相协调、加强宣传舆论改善执法环境、加强警察执法权益的制度保障、加强警用装备设施建设、减少非警务活动、深化执法规范化建设六个方面。     

Hispanic Perceptions of Community Policing

Abstract

The two core elements of community policing are community partnership and problem solving (Rosenbaum, 1994). A major challenge that continues for proponents of community policing is developing and evaluating programs in areas with diverse ethnic groups. While many agencies have successfully developed community policing programs, empirical evaluations of community policing are scarce in areas that include a variety of minority groups. This research explores the effectiveness of community policing by examining citizen satisfaction with local police. Analyses are conducted with data from the Bureau of Justice Statistics on Criminal Victimization and Perceptions of Community Safety in 12 United States cities. The results indicate that Whites and Hispanics have the most positive perceptions of police, while Blacks, Eskimos, Asians, and Pacific Islanders have negative perceptions of police.     

Europol and the Policing of International Terrorism: Counter‐Terrorism in a Global Perspective

The European Police Office (Europol) is an international police organization that was formed to promote cooperation among law enforcement agencies in the European Union. Framed within the context of the Treaty of the European Union, Europol’s mandate includes all serious forms of international crime, including international terrorism. This paper offers an analysis of the organization of Europol’s counter‐terrorism operations in the context of the history and dynamics of international police cooperation. More specifically, on the basis of the bureaucratization theory of policing, Europol is reviewed to exemplify the dual forces of political control over the organization via the regulative bodies of the European Union, on the one hand, and the institutional autonomy and professional expertise of participating police agencies, on the other. The outcome of these dual forces can be expected to determine the course and outcome of counter‐terrorist policing in the European Union in years to come.     

Powers and Accountability of Private Police

Substantial growth in private policing has been documented in countries throughout the world, and the division of responsibilities for policing between public and private authorities has become increasingly blurred and contested during the last three decades. Because private policing is so frequently assessed on the basis of criteria established with respect to the public police, substantial myths have developed about the powers and accountability of private police; specifically, it is commonly asserted that private police have no significant power(s), and are essentially not accountable, in comparison with the public police. The author argues that such assertions misrepresent the very substantial coercive power of private police as well as the variety of mechanisms through which they may be held accountable, and also commonly exaggerate the effective accountability of the public police. The author concludes that a greater appreciation of the actual power and accountability of private police will provide an improved basis for the development of sound public policy with respect to both private and public policing, and with respect to appropriate relationships between private and public policing organisations.     

警务公开--中国警务工作的战略变革

警务公开是时代发展的产物 ,具有广泛而丰富的内容和灵活多样的实施方式。要建立起完善的内外部监督机制 ,以保障警务公开的有效落实。警务公开将公平与正义的理念引入到了警察价值和警察意识之中 ,这是一项历史的进步。中国警察的历史将会对这一页做出积极性的评价。     

对民用爆炸物品管理问题的再思考

民用爆炸物品管理因其涉及人民生命财产安全、公共安全和国家安全,在公共管理中具有十分重要的意义。尽管民用爆炸物品管理问题产生的原因比较复杂,但有关部门对民生关注不够,对民众生命存在关注不够是该问题的思想根源,而利益驱动、管理者与被管理者之间的共谋和同化,以及在此基础上形成的非正式利益分配机制是该问题产生不可忽略的重要原因。因此,对民爆物品管理问题的化解,首要的任务就是解放思想,关注民生;其次才是完善法律制度,严厉打击违反犯罪现象。既要从严治警,还要从优待警,认真推行社区警务,立足综合治理。     

浅析社区警务绩效评估中的公民参与问题

自2002年3月社区警务在全国派出所工作会议上被提上日程以来,我国社区警务工作取得了巨大的成绩。但是,随着社区警务理论研究与实践的不断深入,以往的绩效评估模式已经远不能衡量社区民警的真实工作成绩。要尽快形成与警民共建理念相适应的社区警务绩效评估模式,就需要把公众引入到社区警务的绩效评估中来,以此来规范社区警务的管理,将社区警务的绩效评估工作纳入到科学化、民主化的轨道上来。