对一项社区警务活动的成本分析

社区警务作为一种全新的公安民警服务理念,它要求公安机关为社区提供优质、高效的服务。为此,面向社区的基层公安机关不得不思考警务活动的成本问题。文章正是通过对一项社区警务活动的成本分析入手,为警务管理工作提供选择的方案,从而为提高警务工作的效率提出有益的建言。     

多发性街面犯罪新动向及其因应策略

以抢劫、抢夺、盗窃、扒窃、拎包、诈骗等为内容的多发性街面犯罪,近年来呈现高发势头,特别是犯罪主体与波及区域扩大以及危害程度加深动向,令人触目惊心,已经构成城市社会和谐的严重威胁。导致街面犯罪高发的因素是多方面的,既有社会转型期城乡、贫富差距等一些本源性问题促使,也有法律制约和警务管理等外在因素影响。因此,重视民生、完善制度、发展经济、充分就业、健全社会保障是根本的解决办法,而健全法律体系、强化警务防范与打击力度,则可以压缩街面犯罪空间,促使不法分子放弃犯罪并走向合法道路。     

美国在校园安全管理中的警务运用及其启示

面临校园骚乱频繁的局势,美国制定校园安全法确认校园警察制度,促进了美国校园安全保障工作的良性发展。当前,我国连续发生的校园恶性事件表明校园安全保障工作亟需改善。借鉴美国校园警察制度的经验、制定我国的校园安全法、明确校园警察的法律地位、促进校园警务机制的尽快构建和良性发展,应当成为我国应对校园安全事件的有效保障措施。     

警务工作中心理危机干预体系的建立

＂处突维稳＂是公安机关的一项重要任务,其中很多工作都涉及危机干预,接处警情中多数是处理家庭暴力、家庭纷乱及解救自杀者等,人民警察越来越多地需要进行危机干预工作。警务心理危机干预体系就是在县级以上公安机关内部,建立一支隶属于指挥中心的危机干预队伍,人员来自各基层警队,平时他们有各自的专门工作,遇到突发危机事件时能够迅速出警实施危机干预。     

警务改革视野下促进警民关系和谐的途径

构建"和谐警民关系"是抓好"三项建设"的关键,是提高公安"软实力"的有效措施,也是新时期警务改革的重点。公安机关应在明确和谐警民关系内涵的基础上,分析警民关系的现状和影响警民关系和谐的深层原因,探寻促进警民关系和谐的有效途径,找到发挥和谐警民关系长效和实效的着力点。     

平安农村建设下的警务改革思考

平安农村建设体现了社会协调发展的客观需要,反应了人民群众的殷切期盼,既是构建社会主义和谐社会的重要内容和目标。又是社会主义和谐社会的重要保障。平安农村首先应当是治安状况良好的农村。农村社区警务建设改善了农村治安状况,收到了良好的成效。由于我国社区警务尚处于摸索阶段,社区警务在取得良好成效的同时,存在的问题也不少。本文将在分析农村社区警务建设中出现的新问题的基础上,探索解决方案,以期为创建平安农村,推进农村警务建设提供理论支撑。     

犯罪学研究中的几个热点问题

社区警务、社区矫正与修复性司法都强调整合社区资源、增强社区凝聚力、广泛发动社会公众参与预防和控制犯罪。它们并称为积极性刑事司法的三大支柱,被认为代表了21世纪刑事司法发展的方向,也是当前犯罪学研究中的热点问题。     

北京奥运会危机警务工作若干问题

随着2008年北京奥运会的临近,探讨奥运会危机警务就具有了重要的现实意义。应依据防范为主、高效快捷、协作统一、合法处置、慎用武力、内紧外松等原则来指导危机警务工作。     

Powers and Accountability of Private Police

Substantial growth in private policing has been documented in countries throughout the world, and the division of responsibilities for policing between public and private authorities has become increasingly blurred and contested during the last three decades. Because private policing is so frequently assessed on the basis of criteria established with respect to the public police, substantial myths have developed about the powers and accountability of private police; specifically, it is commonly asserted that private police have no significant power(s), and are essentially not accountable, in comparison with the public police. The author argues that such assertions misrepresent the very substantial coercive power of private police as well as the variety of mechanisms through which they may be held accountable, and also commonly exaggerate the effective accountability of the public police. The author concludes that a greater appreciation of the actual power and accountability of private police will provide an improved basis for the development of sound public policy with respect to both private and public policing, and with respect to appropriate relationships between private and public policing organisations.     

Police and the Public

In this article two features of the theme police and the public are discussed. The first part deals with the public opinion of the police and how the police deal with the public. This is a well-documented issue, but only very generally related to 'policing'. The problem of dealing with the public arises in very similar terms in all administrations, public services and community services. The qualities expected of a 'front office' (speed, competence, confidentiality, etc.) are not peculiar to the police. On the other hand, the situation of a public policing service as an urban police force is currently very specific, has an unusual, virtually undocumented historical background and is therefore worth dealing with in much greater detail. This is done in the second part of the article. To grasp this role, one needs to consider the way in which the public police service has evolved in the last half-century. Admittedly, the situation in France has certain special features, but these are simply magnified versions of things which exist elsewhere. It may be true that the institutional background has precipitated developments in France, but that same background is present in all comparable countries.