新时代的农民工回流:逻辑、错位及其平衡——基于安徽、贵州、江西三省的调查

农民工回流是社会流动的主要表现。作为历时性、空间性的社会现象,农民工回流是政府、企业、家庭、个人等多元主体共同影响的结果,与政策制度、公共服务、经济水平、技术发展、家庭功能等多种因素密切相关,由政治逻辑、市场逻辑、技术逻辑与生活逻辑综合作用而成。但是,政治逻辑和市场逻辑主导下的农民工回流更多地体现出阶段性与被动性,技术逻辑和生活逻辑的作用较为持续与稳定。要从完善农民工市民化政策体系、增强企业社会责任、提高农民工人力资本、加快乡村基础设施建设等方面保障农民工的基本权益,实现农民工“留得下、稳得住、活得好、回得去”的政策预期。     

“They cut my son’s head,legs and hands before me”: pre- and post-terror experiences among returnee victims of Boko Haram in Orlu,Imo State

ABSTRACT

This research note offers first-hand accounts of the plight of “non-indigenes” who became victims of Boko Haram terrorism in the North, and their resettlement back in their “homeland” in Orlu (Imo State). As “strangers” in various towns of the North, they were victimized by Boko Haram and had to develop various strategies to survive. Many of them, however, returned to their “homeland” only to become victims of new forms of social exclusion, as “strangers in their own land.”     

Constructing the homeland: Kazakhstan's discourse and policies surrounding its ethnic return-migration policy

A new political development that emerged after the disintegration of the Soviet Union was the adoption of ‘homeland stances’ by the newly independent states. Through the construction of the homeland image, the states of the region claimed responsibility not only for their own citizens, but also for a diaspora community of co-ethnics. Kazakhstan became one of these states and its leadership portrayed Kazakhstan as the homeland of the Kazakh diaspora. Furthermore, Kazakhstan's leadership developed far more active homeland rhetoric and initiated an ethnic return-migration policy as early as 1992. This paper will explore the discourse of Kazakhstan's leadership on the repatriation of its co-ethnics as well as the legal and political context that it created to achieve their smooth absorption into domestic society.     

略论和谐社会的构建与社会冲突的应对

构建社会主义和谐社会必须处理好社会冲突问题。直面我国当前社会冲突的现状,有必要重构社会冲突观,在深刻分析社会冲突的根源、性质和功能的基础上,探索社会冲突的回归路径,促进社会和谐。     

Occupancy rights: life planners and the Navajos

ABSTRACT

This Comment focuses on the limitations of Stilz’s individualist conception of occupancy rights. Her account of occupancy is critical to her attempt to answer the question of where one holds territorial rights as well as related place-related rights like the right of return. Her account appeals to the geographical location of individual life plans. This Comment argues that this fails to distinguish between Indigenous People who are connected historically and in many other ways to a place and individual Life-Planners: it treats the two as equivalent, which I argue is counter-intuitive. I also argue that Stilz’s occupancy account fails to explain the scope of occupancy rights in a number of cases that she appeals to in her examples, such as the Navajos’ expulsion from the area in which they lived. What she needs, I argue, is a group based conception of occupancy rights, in addition to the idea of individual rights of residency.     

人力资本回报与城乡收入差距变动

使用中国收入分配课题组2013年和2018年的住户调查数据，对城乡收入差距的变动特征及其人力资本成因进行了分析。发现城镇人均收入高于农村且内部差距更小，城乡收入差距随着收入分位点的上升而下降，且低收入组两年间的城乡收入比率上升幅度较大。总体不平等指数两年变化不大，组间差距有所下降，但组内差距有所上升。由于城镇人口和收入占比较大，城镇对全国不平等指数的贡献大于农村，且两年有所增长。从总体收入函数的分解来看，城镇和教育变量是总体收入不平等的主要贡献因素，城镇变量系数随着收入分位点上升而下降。教育是城乡组间收入差距禀赋效应的主要贡献因素，总体随着收入分位点的上升其禀赋效应越大，2018年中间收入群体的教育禀赋效应是最大的，系数效应随着收入分位点的上升而下降。     

Unforgettable Guling

正IN February 2012,on a visit to the U.S.,then Vice President Xi Jinping recounted an old story of friendship between China and America:An American man called Milton Gardner grew up in Guling(Kuliang in Fuzhou dialect),China.He had fond memories of his childhood there and often wished he could return.Sadly,Gardner died before he could fulfill his dream,but in 1992,his wife,Elizabeth,made a long-awaited trip to the village.She,too,soon fell in love with Guling and China.     

代为保管问题研究

代为保管是指非财物所有人基于一定的原因而处于自己事实上控制着的他人财物进行保管的行为。它有以下几个特点:第一,保管人对保管物没有所有权;第二,按所有权圆满性的要求,保管人对物有妥善保管的义务;第三,按所有权绝对性和排他性的要求,保管人有返还保管物于合法权利人之义务。因而,代为保管的本质是非财物所有人基于保管和返还他人之物的义务而对他人之物处于事实上的控制状态而非仅仅是法律上的支配。对他人之物处于事实上的控制不必基于合法原因。代为保管的归宿是保管人对返还处于其事实上控制的他人之物的义务具有民事义务和刑事义务的双重属性。     

证据之异化及回归——以证据与证据运用区分为中心

证据作为证明的根据丧失了其客观性基础，异化的证据以主观性的形态出现。造成这种异化的原因是证据与证据运用概念的混淆。通过证据与证据运用的区分对证据重释，使证据回归其本来面目，主观性不再是证据的属性。证据的回归可以合理解释司法证明过程中的一些难题。