牛伪狂犬病的实验室诊断

对不明原因役牛猝死症病料组织触片镜检和分离培养皆未发现细菌;乳胶凝集试验检查发现3份送检血清皆为伪狂犬病病毒(PrV)抗体阳性;ELISA检测结果,其中2份为PrV gE抗体阳性,而且这2份血清PrV中和抗体也为阳性;以脑组织制备DNA模板进行PCR,扩增到特异性的PrV DNA片段;对健康成年兔接种病牛脑、肺等病料,表现典型的伪狂犬病症状.综合流行病学、细菌学、血清学、分子生物学和动物试验结果,确诊为牛伪狂犬病.     

用PCR扩增X-Y-特异片段性别鉴定的研究

采用5%Chelex-100处理方法提取 DNA,用 PCR 扩增 Amelogenin 基因片段检测血痕和毛根的性别。扩增一个样品只需1/10体积3mm~2血痕 Chelex-100处理液或1/10体积一根毛发 Chelex-100处理液(含模板 DNA)。100例血液样品结果显示,在男性可同时显现977bpX 特异片段和788bpY 特异片段,而在女性只观察到977bp X 特异片段,该方法用于性别鉴定可靠、灵敏、方便。     

重庆市山羊博尔纳病病毒P24基因的检测

为了解重庆市山羊博尔纳病隐性带毒情况,分析博尔纳病病毒(BDV)的种系来源。采用巢式逆转录酶PCR结合荧光定量PCR(FQ-nRT-PCR)技术对重庆市60只山羊外周血单核细胞 (PBMCs)及脑组织中的BDV P24基因片段进行了检测,将阳性产物测序,并与国外BDV毒株进行了比较。结果,山羊外周血检测阳性率为8．3％(5／60),脑组织检测阳性率为10％(6／60)。该 BDV P24片段核苷酸序列与马源BDV H1766株同源性最高,达96．51％,与标准株Strain V和 He／80同源性为95．35％,并且编码的氨基酸序列也相同。表明,重庆市山羊中存在动物源性博尔纳病隐性带毒。该BDV P24核苷酸序列与Strain V和He／80株具有高度同源性。     

用多聚酶链反应检测非洲猪瘟病毒的研究

用HindⅢ对非洲猪瘟病毒核酸的重组质粒pRPEL2进行酶切后,将第5片段插入到pT7/T3α-19上而得到亚克隆重组质粒pT7 ASFH5。用双脱氧末端终止法测定了该插入片段的核苷酸序列。在此基础上选择了一段含194bp的片段作为扩增模板,并人工合成了该片段两端含20个碱基的寡核苷酸作为引物,从而建立了诊断非洲猪瘟病毒的多聚酶链反应。与核酸杂交相比,该方法不但更为快速和简便,而且灵敏度提高了一千万倍左右.     

扩增X—Y同源Amelogenin基因内含子在性别鉴定中的应用研究

本文用一对针对X－Y同源的Amelogenin基因第一内含子的引物，于同一试管中分别扩增出针对于x和Y染色体的特异性DNA片段：106bp及112bp的PCR产物，经聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳后用银染法观察扩增结果，取得了满意的效果．对50pgDNA模板室温放置16年的血痕及单根毛发、烟头等检材均可得到明确的性别鉴定结果．本实验证明该方法简便、灵敏、可靠、特别适用于腐败降解检材的法医学性别鉴定．     

9个Y-STR基因座荧光复合扩增系统的法医学应用

目的建立9个Y-STR基因座的复合扩增系统,提高Y-STR的法医学检测效能。方法6-FAM标记DYS434、Y-GATA-A10、DYS438、DYS439,HEX标记DYS531、DYS557、DYS448,TAMRA标记DYS456、DYS444引物,PCR复合扩增,毛细管电泳得到结果,考察扩增系统的个体识别能力、灵敏度、特异性、组织同一性。结果所建立的9个Y-STR复合扩增系统分型清晰,单倍型多样性达0.9968,特异性好,灵敏度高(0.5ngDNA),并且在男女混合斑检验上较常染色体STR分型更有优势。结论9个Y-STR复合扩增系统具有较高的识别能力,对建立Y染色体STR数据库,研究群体遗传学和进行法医学混合斑物证鉴定有重要意义。     

Characterization of the N+3 stutter product in the trinucleotide repeat locus DYS392

Stutter products generated during DNA amplification by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) may complicate mixture interpretation. The PCR amplification of the DYS392 locus typically results in three distinct detectable PCR products: the true allele product (N), a stutter product three bases smaller (N-3), and a reproducible low-level product, three bases larger (N+3). Sequence analysis of the N+3 product demonstrated that its sequence is one TAT repeat longer than the true allele product. Our experiments demonstrated that the quantity of both N-3 and N+3 stutter increased as the allele number increased. The percent stutter also increased as the magnesium concentration was increased in the reaction, as well as when the amount of input DNA was decreased. As both stutter products behave in a similar and reproducible fashion, the same rules that apply to the interpretation of N-3 stutter products in short tandem repeat analysis, can be applied to N+3 stutters. The characterization of the DYS392 N+3 product is the first detailed published study of a stutter product larger than the true allele.     

广东广西地区5个群体9个STR基因座的频率调查

目的 调查广东汉族、广西汉族、广西侗族、广西壮族、广西苗族5个群体9个STR基因座多态性,探讨其在法医学检验中的应用价值。方法 应用AmpFISTR Profiler PlusTM荧光标记复合扩增系统,对广东广西5个群体4个民族的1191个无关个体的血样DNA进行9个STR基因座的复合扩增;用ABI 3100遗传分析仪对扩增产物进行分型,统计9个STR基因座的群体遗传学参数。结果 9个STR基因座在广东广西地区5个群体中的累积偶合率为1.51×10-11～8.08×10-11,累积非父排除率为0.99981—0.99990。,结论 该9个STR基因座可满足汉族、壮族、侗族、苗族群体法医学的个体识别及亲权鉴定的需要。     

4个miniSTR基因座复合扩增体系及应用

目的构建D6S474、D20S482、D4S2408、D6S1017等4个miniSTR基因座复合扩增体系,评价其对腐败检材的应用价值,调查4个基因座在汉族人群中的遗传多态性。方法采用不同荧光标记4个miniSTR基因座上游引物,构建复合扩增体系。用分子克隆方法制备等位基因分型标准物。采用上述体系对135份汉族无关个体血样进行检测,并计算群体遗传学参数。比较该体系与ID试剂盒在降解检材分析中的成功率。结果采用本文复合扩增体系检测,汉族人群中4个基因座基因型频率分布均符合Hardy-Weinberg平衡定律,累积个人识别能力为0.999 666,累积非父排除率为0.914 902。本文体系较ID试剂盒对自然腐败检材的分型成功率更高。结论 4个miniSTR基因座复合扩增体系对法庭科学实践,特别是对腐败检材的检测有应用价值。     

Comparison of two methods for isolating DNA from human skeletal remains for STR analysis

Abstract: The quality and efficiency of a standard organic DNA isolation method and a silica‐based method using the QIAGEN Blood Maxi Kit were compared to obtain human DNA and short tandem repeats (STRs) profiles from 39 exhumed bone samples for paternity testing. DNA samples were quantified by real‐time PCR, and STR profiles were obtained using the AmpFlSTR^® Identifiler^® PCR amplification kit. Overall, the silica‐based method recovered less DNA ranging from 0 to 147.7 ng/g (average 7.57 ng/g, median = 1.3 ng/g) than did the organic method ranging from 0 to 605 ng/g (average 44.27 ng/g, median = 5.8 ng/g). Complete profiles (16/16 loci tested) were obtained from 37/39 samples (95%) using the organic method and from 9/39 samples (23%) with the silica‐based method. Compared with a standard organic DNA isolation method, our results indicate that the published silica‐based method does not improve neither the quality nor the quantity of DNA for STR profiling.