公务员职位分类制度的比较与借鉴

职位分类制度是加强对公务员管理的重要制度,自美国开创职位分类制度以来,各国纷纷推行公务员的职位分类制度,中国也不例外。但是各国的职位分类制度各有特色,有优点也有不足。中国的职位分类制度同样存在许多问题,本文旨在借鉴国外公务员职位分类的优点以完善我国的公务员职位分类制度。     

中西方法治意识生成因素的比较

西方的法治意识是基于西方的文化传统所内生的一种社会思想意识,是西方社会经济、文化自然演进的结果.而中国的法治意识是在对西方法治的传入与"移植"过程中,在外力的作用下逐步形成的.考察西方法治的发展历史,我们发现,法治是西方社会发展和社会进步的一个理性选择,是融合了社会文化和经济因素的产物.与法治相适应的法治意识的培育,是法治得以实现的基础.在培育我国公民法治意识的过程中,需要运用比较研究的方法对中西方法治意识的生成因素做深入的分析和法理思考,从而获得有益的启示.     

Crime in Central and Eastern European Countries in the Enlarged Europe

An enlarged European Union not only means more territory and a greater population, but also more crimes and perpetrators of crimes. The European integration brings a new challenge to criminology. Comparison of crime statistics across countries is still one of the most difficult methodological problems in criminological analyses. Countries differ in respect of their penal systems and penal policies. Reporting and statistical systems are also different. How, then, can one compare crime between European countries? Can one say where it is safer or where the police work better? Can one determine what the manner of data collection should be so that it reflects reality accurately? This article concentrates on a representation of some trends of crime in Central and Eastern European countries. A main source of information about crime are official crime statistics collected according to the methodological rules worked out by the European Sourcebook of Crime and Criminal Justice Statistics. In the case of homicide, police data are confronted with vital statistics gathered by the World Heath Organization (WHO). The statistics on assault and robbery were compared, as much as possible, with the victimization data from the International Crime Victims Survey (ICVS). The socio-economic context of the crime, the main circumstances of the crime statistics, which affected the interpretation of the crime trends for Central and Eastern European Countries, is presented.     

依法规范 适度监督 大力支持——解读最高人民法院《关于适用〈中华人民共和国仲裁法〉若干问题的解释》草案三稿

最高人民法院《关于适用〈中华人民共和国仲裁法〉若干问题的解释》已历经三稿,其中对某些问题的规定也几经变化。本文重点就草案三稿对某些问题的规定及其变化进行对比分析,并在此基础上表明作者自己的观点。     

内地与澳门仲裁法律制度的比较(上)

内地与澳门现行仲裁法律制度形成时间都比较晚,两者也曾有一定的历史渊源。①随着《内地与澳门关于建立更紧密经贸关系的安排》及其附件文本在2003年10月17日正式签署,两地的经贸往来将更加频繁,民商事纠纷也势必增多。加强对两地仲裁法律制度的比较研究,对于促进两地仲裁制度发展和合作,推动两地更紧密经贸关系的建立具有重要意义。     

中共三代领导人人权思想的比较及现实思考

毛泽东、邓小平、江泽民作为中国共产党的三代领导核心,由于他们所处的时代背景不同,观察、分析问题的方法迥异,因此其人权思想在内容、特点、个人风格上均存在较大差别。但全面考察三代领导人的人权思想便不难发现,他们在诸多方面又存在许多相同点。文章在分析比较三代领导核心人权思想的异同点的基础上,提出了若干方面的现实思考。     

滥用职权罪立法比较与借鉴

世界各个国家和地区都注重通过立法加强对滥用职权行为的惩治。我国滥用职权罪条文设计不合理 ,罪状不明确 ,主体范围过窄 ,刑罚设立不科学。应及时修改立法 ,将滥用职权罪与玩忽职守罪分列 ,明确其特征 ,扩大其主体范围 ,提高其法定刑。     

Could lessons have been drawn from New Zealand for England’s NHS reforms?

This article argues that New Zealand (NZ) could be an important case for drawing health system reform lessons from for the English National Health Service. Reasons for this are outlined, including the close similarities between the two countries and their health systems. The article describes the diverging health reform agendas of conservative governments in both countries, noting a series of lessons for England that might have been drawn from NZ. Explanations for the differing reform agendas are then offered.     

3种骨骼DNA提取方法的应用效果比较

目的对3种方法提取骨骼DNA的效果进行比较,为实际应用中选择方法提供参考。方法应用骨骼孵化液法、DNA Investigator试剂盒法和CTAB法对同一骨骼样本进行脱钙、消化、提取DNA,用紫外分光光度计检测DNA的浓度值;使用Identifilerplus试剂盒进行PCR扩增,3130xl型遗传分析仪检测分型,并用SPSS 19.0软件对各项实验结果进行统计分析。结果 1g骨粉样本经上述3种方法提取,得到的DNA浓度分别为26.53ng/μL±5.47ng/μL、23.63ng/μL±4.56ng/μL、14.93ng/μL±3.88ng/μL;单因素方差分析表明3组数据之间差异性具有统计学意义。PCR扩增后电泳检测结果显示,骨骼孵化液法和DNA Investigator试剂盒法基因座检出率和峰值大致相同,均优于CTAB法。结论本文比较的3种方法均可用于骨骼样本的实际检案,检出率较高的两种方法可作为优选方案。     

人权背景下煤矿安全生产领域刑事法律的运用

近年来,我国煤炭生产事故频发,为了预防矿难事故,我国应利用刑法手段,加大刑法在煤炭安全生产领域里的调控力度,强化对煤炭生产过程中的违法违规行为的惩处力度,使煤炭生产企业和有关人员严格遵守国家法律法规,关心矿工的生命安全,以期更好地预防矿难事故的发生。