Transformation of China＇s Society and Revision of the Criminal Proceedings Code

当今中国各个领域的重大转型都根源于国家与社会的二元化和由此所导致的国家、社会与个人关系的转型，即从“国家、社射个人”模式转向“国家／社会、个人”模式，其实质是从国家本位主义转向社会本位主义和人本主义。中国社会的这一转型导致了刑事诉讼本质观、目的观、价值观、构造观和刑事证明理论的变迁，而这些观念和理论的变迁又反映在《刑事诉讼法》的修改中。     

迷宫中的路径：论《法律适用法》之适用

《法律适用法》的颁布意味着我国国际私法的法典化告一段落,但它与旧法之间的平行有效模式则面临着规则冲突导致的适用难题。在目前的宪政和立法框架下,＂上位法优于下位法＂原理难以适用于新法与旧法之间的关系,＂特别法优于一般法＂原理也不能用于确定新法与《民法通则》等全国人大制定的旧法之间的优先次序。走出这一迷宫的关键在于对《法律适用法》第2条作出合理的解读,确立《法律适用法》适用上的双轨制。     

签名笔迹的新特点及检验对策

签名笔迹的字迹一贯具有数量少、检验难度大的特点。近年来,签名检验案件增多,出现了摹仿水平高、伪装意识强、平时样本收集难等新的特点。为了提高签名笔迹检验的准确性,应当拓展样本收集权限,提高检验技术水平,实行鉴定结论分级制。     

中国物权法的意涵与时代特征

物权法在中国历经引进、否定、转向、曲折,最终实现复兴,它始终没有改变沿着中华民族的民富国强的这一方向而前进。2007年在中国共产党的领导下颁布的中国《物权法》在中国特色社会主义道路的巩固、中国改革开放事业的更深层次的发展、中国人权保护事业的进步以及中国民法法典化的最终实现等方面彰显其十分重要的社会意义;同时,囿于诸多方面的原因,该法在一些内容的厘定上留有时代的烙印,带有时代的特征。中国《物权法》的颁布,预示着中国的改革开放、人权保护、民法典的制定乃至于中国特色社会主义道路的新的启程。中国《物权法》的这一积极效果与历史进步的取向是最主要的。该法中的落后规定或未作规定的事项,可以通过将来制定民法典、修改《物权法》或制定司法解释予以补充、克服和完善。     

清代的民事法源问题再探析——以巴县档案中的坟产讼案为中心

在清代的民事审判中,官府并非严格依照《大清律例》,而只是参照了《大清律例》的基本原则。《大清律例》中的相关规定除了具有参照作用外,还具有威慑作用和原则的指引作用。同时,由于民间习俗得到司法认同,官府在审断中还需考虑＂天理＂和＂人情＂等因素,州县官通常将＂情、理、法＂作为一个＂整体性＂原则来考量具体案件。因此,清代的民事审判不是黄宗智所谓的严格＂依据律例进行判决＂,也并非滋贺秀三所言的＂依据情理＂进行＂教谕式的调解＂,应该从＂法律多元＂的视角来考量清代的民事法源问题。     

妇女文学的长时段考察——从王萌《禁锢的灵魂与挣扎的慧心——晚明至民国女性创作主体意识研究》说起

长期以来,在中国传统妇女文学研究中,人们习惯于用现代的认知方式观察传统,运用现代知识阐释传统问题,不可避免地造成对妇女文学的误解和遮蔽,无法正确地看待妇女文学的德性诉求。对这一问题进行梳理和辨析,并探寻对其德性品格进行现代传承的可能性,具有重要的学术价值。     

签名笔迹检验的实践研究

针对签名笔迹检验字迹数量较少的客观问题,设法提高可供检验用的检材字迹内容和数量,其实践性对策有检验人员对检材字迹对象扩展到如落款日期、单位等字迹,观察借条和收条等文书的其余部分手写字迹,通过查阅卷宗发现与检验要求相关的字迹,系统检验多份检材上的字迹是否为同一人所为,以期客观、可靠地做出评断意见。     

Constructing Common Regulations of General Part of China's Environmental Code from the Perspective of Legal Order

Order comes first in legal values, while laws should maintain the consistency and stability of order. The proposed China's environmental code (Code) shall restate the prevailing environmental legal norms and optimize the prevailing environmental legal order. From the perspective of stabilizing the legal order, common regulations of General Part of the Code should connect with the constitution and the prevailing environmental laws, determine the legal values of the Code-governing environment, and provide the foundation and basic framework for each subsequent part of the Code. Therefore, common regulations of the Code should recognize and support the constitution order and bolster the emerging eco-environment legal order relating to the eco-civilization construction. They should be coherent, value-orientated, and independent, inheriting the general framework of the prevailing Environmental Protection Law of the People's Republic of China (PRC) and other specific environmental laws, and developing the applicable norms. Specifically, consistently with the legislative purposes, the Code common regulations should recognize the objectives of construction of eco-civilization and pursuit of social, economic and ecological sustainable development, and this pursuit should be carried out based on the basic principles; the application scope of ecological environment should be redefined in order to maintain the ecological value and overall ecological order; the clause on basic environmental obligations and the clause on citizens' environmental rights should be defined with the national environmental protection obligations as the main thread and the multi-player legal relationship as the framework; and the national environmental protection obligations should be preliminarily delivered with three clauses: national environmental protection financial support, environmental publicity and education, and global environmental governance.     

Building of a Dissension Settlement Mechanism in the China's Environmental Code

It is not currently appropriate to make detailed provisions on an ecological and environmental dissension settlement mechanism in the would-be China's environmental code (Code), given the prevailing mechanism status in China. Such provisions need to be appropriately selected under the philosophy of moderate codification, and various methods should be adopted according to the actual situation of the specific system. Contradictions between various systems should be removed in the compiling of this Code, which eventually would make an ecological and environmental dissension settlement mechanism with complementary functions and procedural coordination, ensuring that ecological and environmental dissensions can be smoothly resolved within the updated framework, and damaged interests can be fully remedied.