市场社会主义和社会资本主义

根据当代社会主义和资本主义的发展现状,应从历史唯物主义的层面抽象出“市场社会主义”和“社会资本主义”这两个科学社会主义的新范畴,以反映客观现实并指导我们正确地观察当代世界,观察当代中国。     

马克思劳动价值论发展的新趋势新特点

马克思劳动价值理论是在100多年前的社会经济条件下产生的,由于科技革命、经济全球化,社会经济条件已经发生了巨大变化,从而劳动价值理论发展出现了一系列新特点、新趋势:创造价值的劳动内涵发生变化,外延不断扩大,复杂劳动更加复杂。据此新变化、新特点,本文概括抽象出“持续劳动”这一新的劳动范畴。     

邓小平理论与当代中国的社会分层

党的十一届三中全会以来,我国社会阶级阶层结构发生了巨大的变化,这一变化与邓小平的理论创新和实践探索是密不可分的:首先,邓小平关于知识分子和阶级斗争的新理论,突破了传统的阶级阶层分析方法,确立了社会主义现代化建设的三大基本依靠力量;其次,邓小平的改革开放理论与实践,促进了当代中国的社会分层和流动,大大增加了我国社会结构的弹性和社会活力;再次,邓小平的共同富裕理论和统一战线理论,为协调各阶级阶层之间的经济和政治利益矛盾提供了科学指导,有力地维护了安定团结的政治局面。     

现代启蒙:哈贝马斯社会批判理论的重新审视——兼论"启蒙与现代性"的关联

哈贝马斯创建社会批判理论的过程 ,就是他探索批判理论“规范性”的过程。在确定以“交往行动理论和话语伦理学”为理论核心的过程中 ,哈贝马斯对于启蒙的思考经历了断裂、残缺和重建三个阶段 ,其中关于“启蒙与现代性”之间关系的思想 ,为他的社会批判理论奠定了基础 ,并最终使他偏离了马克思历史唯物主义的科学批判维度。     

以"三个代表"重要思想为指导繁荣云南哲学社会科学事业

在建立社会主义市场经济、建设有中国特色社会主义的过程中 ,必须以“三个代表”的重要思想为指导 ,充分重视哲学社会科学研究的重大意义。云南省哲学社会科学研究在全省的经济社会发展中发挥了重要作用。进入 2 1世纪 ,新时期对云南省哲学社会科学研究提出了更高的要求 ,坚持“与时俱进” ,推进理论创新 ,才能使哲学社会科学研究更好地为党和政府决策服务 ,为建设云南民族文化大省服务     

Getting a `Get' – the Limits of Law's Authority? N. v. N. (Jurisdiction: Pre-Nuptial Agreement) [1999] 2 F.L.R. 745

This note examines the decision of the Family Division of the High Court in N. v. N. (Jurisdiction: Pre-Nuptial Agreement) in which, in the context of Jewish divorce proceedings, the Court found that it had no jurisdiction to order a husband, by specific performance of a marriage agreement, to go through the procedure to obtain a ‘get’ (a hand-written bill of divorcement) allowing his wife to remarry. First, discussion of the case is contextualised broadly within the debate on the (de)merits of employing legal means in order to redress social wrongs. Secondly, adopting a theoretical perspective upon the difficulties involved in using law to achieve social change, the note goes on to examine more specifically why women from minority cultures may choose to go to the law of the dominant culture in order to obtain relief. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

The Cost of the Game: A Taxonomy of Social Interactions

This paper considers the role of reciprocity rules in various strategic settings. After distinguishing four typical categories of social interaction, the paper examines three forms of reciprocity constraints. An ideal rule of perfect incentive alignment (structural reciprocity) serves as a benchmark for the analysis of a golden rule of reciprocity, characterized by a mechanical linking of one player's strategy to that of the other player; and a silver rule of stochastic reciprocity, characterized by a probabilistic symmetry in the relationship between the players.     

“两国论”的社会基础与台湾政情

“两国论”不但有特殊的背景,而且有相当的社会基础,值得忧虑和警惕。但是,台湾的安全与稳定,台湾民众的福祉皆系于坚持“一个中国”的基本原则:因此,虽有人妄言修宪定国,却未敢冒险付诸行动;各“总统”候选人在竞选白热化之际打“两岸关系”牌,恰恰说明了台湾民众对“两国论”没有信心。     

从苏东变局看无产阶级执政党始终代表先进生产力的极端重要性

前苏东国家执政党长期背离解放和发展生产力的根本任务,导致经济发展滞后,人民生活水平提高缓慢,最终被人民所唾弃.江泽民同志总揽全局,在世纪之交提出了具有强烈针对性和时代感的“三个代表”思想,发展了马克思主义的建党学说,为中国共产党在新世纪应对各种风浪和挑战的考验提供了强大的思想武器.     

Is Irrigationalism a Dominant Ideology in Securing Hydrotopia in Mekong Nation States?

ABSTRACT

For over six decades, grandiose proposals calling for significant expansion of public irrigation schemes have been commonplace throughout the Mekong region, irrespective of the political configuration or developmental stage of each state. From Pol Pot’s Democratic Kampuchea to Thailand’s military and quasi-democratic regimes, irrigation has figured prominently on development agendas. Mainstream narratives around irrigation are embedded in a technocentric, developmental and nationalistic discourse, incorporating socially pre-conditioned beliefs and values that closely reflect the rhetoric of state-linked elites. This article critically examines some of the narratives employed by key actors and groups to justify ongoing practices and processes of irrigation development, focusing on Thailand and Cambodia. It seeks to look beyond conventional econometric and instrumental drivers, to consider other socio-political factors that may account for irrigation’s critical role as a “technology of control,” but which are rarely examined across comparative national contexts. Further, it proposes a dominant ideology of irrigation developmentalism or “irrigationalism” as a useful concept in explaining certain aspects of contemporary social power in these nations. State-led irrigation may be perceived as a utopian intervention that aids in the emergence of an effective monopolistic authority and control by bureaucracies and other powerful groups over development decision-making processes and silencing opposition.