充分认识和把握安全生产的重要意义

解决长期以来制约我省发展的安全生产问题，必须首先从深层次上解决认识问题。充分认识和把握实现安全生产的重要意义，就需要把能否实现安全生产提到事关人民群众根本利益的高度，就需要把能否实现安全生产提到事关党的执政能力建设和先进性建设的高度，就需要把能否实现安全生产提到事关社会和谐稳定的高度。     

创新社会管理机制 促进治安秩序稳定

深入推进三项重点工作,充分发挥执法办案在化解矛盾纠纷中的基础作用。构建和谐社会就必须重视社会治安问题,根据新的形势创新社会管理机制,加强基层法制建设。社会治安体系的创新和建设是一项系统工程。     

限制财产权侦查措施研究

限制财产权侦查措施是针对贪利型犯罪行之有效的手段,财产权是公民基本的权利,完善限制财产权侦查措施有利于保护犯罪嫌疑人的合法财产权,有利于保护受害人的合法权益,而且为侦查机关严格、公正执法提供了重要的法律依据。     

权利与公共利益的博弈——基于权利成本与政府负担的视角

任何权利的实现都需要成本，无论如何，该成本都需要由政府支付。基于政府实现公共利益的角色，权利和公共利益发生冲突不可避免。二者之间的博弈就在于权利的实现需要成本的支付，公共利益的实现也需要政府来负担。     

辩诉交易在目前中国的收益与成本分析

对比辩诉交易成本与收益可以分析出其整体效益。辩诉交易具有一定的内在价值，比如，能在多个环节节省时间；可节约司法资源；能有效地减少积案；对被告人、被害人及其家属、司法机关等有一定好处。然而，辩诉交易也会产生巨大成本，造成正义缺失、权力寻租，威胁司法公信力和司法价值观等一系列问题。就其整体效益而言，时间效益和经济效益之得难以弥补社会效益之失。     

人权保障机制下警察盘查制度的重构

盘查是国家基于人民警察的职责和任务依法赋予人民警察的一项重要职权，对于警察在日常治安行政管理活动中及时预防、发现、打击违法犯罪有着积极的作用。由于盘查启动的随意性，运行的任意性，尤其是超范围行使盘查权和超时限行使盘查权，导致在警察盘查中有冲击公民人身权的危险。因此应当从盘查权的启动、运行、救济方面来合理规范盘查权的行使，以实现保障公民人权的终极目的。     

CHILDREN'S RIGHTS IN EUROPEAN LEGAL PROCEEDINGS: WHY ARE FAMILY PRACTICES SO DIFFERENT FROM LEGAL THEORIES?

Debates about child custody following parental separation often have been framed in terms of a battle between the competing rights of different family members. In the United States, advocates of mothers’ rights square off against proponents of fathers’ rights, with each side claiming to truly represent children's rights. Of course, not all advocates lay claim to children's rights in contact and custody disputes merely as a tactical maneuver. Some experts believe that children are entitled to (and benefit from) their own, independent legal advocate in custody cases. In theory, at least, the position that children lay claim to a third set of independent rights is strongly held in Europe, more strongly than in many U.S. states, because of the adoption of United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child in Europe, but not in the United States. In this article, we examine children's rights in custody disputes from a European perspective, particularly children's legal right to contact with their parents, as well as the children's right to be heard in custody and contact disputes. We find that, despite differences in legal theory, tradition, and family demographics, European countries ultimately face a familiar reality: Custody and contact disputes are, in reality, more about renegotiating family relationships than they are a matter of a mother's, father's, or child's rights.     

集团诉讼存在的理由——关于普通法集团诉讼目的论的研究

普通法系国家集团诉讼目的包括:为社会成员提供权利救济,为被告提供程序保障并矫正其行为,尊重集团成员的个人自治等具体目标。我国现行代表人诉讼制度中蕴含的"两便"目的,难以描述和解释深层立法动机,集团诉讼上述目的对优化我国代表人诉讼制度有借鉴意义。     

Proactive counter-terrorist strategies in conflict with human rights

Three standard governmental policy responses to terrorism have been identified: a military one, treating the fight against terrorism as a form of warfare; a police-based one, treating it simply as a form of criminal activity, to be detected and then defeated using (perhaps some modified version of) the criminal justice system; and a political one, viewing it as a form of armed rebellion to be resolved through negotiation and the political process. All three responses to terrorism may be evident in any particular instance.     

论《物权法》中强制转让物权的法律维度

任何有物权立法之国家均无法回避物权强制转让的内容。依法律规则和法定程序发生的物权强制转让并不违背私法意思自治原则,相反,是对意思自治原则并无绝对性的最佳注释。强制转让物权必须注意强制转让与规则之间的关系、强制转让与权利实现目的之间的关系。鉴于强制转让物权是对权利人意思自治的限制,故物权的强制转让之发生应当具有一定的前提,即权利人行使权利的意志与公共利益发生了冲突。这意味着只有当权利人行使自己之物权与公共利益发生冲突时,方产生物权被按照法律规则进行强制转移的可能。物权的强制转让具有其一般条件和限制,它们与物权转让发生之前提共同构成了强制转让物权法律维度的主要内容。