网络言论自由中的社会公共安全问题

网络言论自由在促进社会公共安全的同时,因其匿名性、即时性、个性化特征,言论的随意和放纵亦随之出现。假以网络言论自由的名义实际上违反言论自由的言论给社会公共安全造成现实的冲击,这一方面有言论者言说的策略因素,另一方面也有网络受众自身的原因。为了网络言论自由在生活中得以真正落实,必须树立正确的态度,促进网络言论自由积极作用的发挥,强化对其负面作用的规制。     

基于语音情感分析系统的语音压力测谎

目的探究语音情感分析系统(Layered Voice Analysis,LVA)在不同情况下的表现,并通过分析数据找出影响系统识别率的因素。方法设置两种不同场景对20名研究对象进行提问,并录音。通过LVA语音系统对语音样本进行分析,使用SPSS统计软件对系统生成的参数进行统计分析。结果在未告知研究对象实验真相的情况下LVA语音系统平均识别率为91.75%,要远高于研究对象在知情情况下的识别率。在询问过程中,当未涉及敏感问题时,随着时间的推移研究对象的心理压力逐渐减小。结论LVA语音系统具有良好的情感分析和识别能力,可为司法工作提供参考。     

Self-respect and public reason

In A Theory of Justice John Rawls argues that self-respect is ‘perhaps the most important’ primary good, and that its status as such gives crucial support to controversial ideas like the lexical priority of liberty. Given the importance of these ideas for Rawls, it should be no surprise that they have attracted much critical attention. In response to these critics I give a defense of self-respect that grounds its importance in Rawls’s moral conception of the person. I show that this understanding of self-respect goes well beyond giving support to the lexical priority of liberty, also supporting Rawls’s still more controversial view of public reason. On my account, taking self-respect seriously requires the coercive enforcement of public reason. This is a novel argument for public reason, in that it grounds the idea in justice as fairness and mandates its coercive enforcement.     

平衡论之价值——以美国政府有关公民言论自由的理念嬗变为例

平衡论是现代行政法学及宪法学的重要基础理论,对于指导我国行政法制建设,推动社会主义市场经济体制的建立,实现民主与效率的有机统一具有重要的意义。美国政府有关公民言论自由之理念嬗变为平衡论的价值作了最好的诠释。     

A hypothetical neurological association between dehumanization and human rights abuses

Dehumanization is anecdotally and historically associated with reduced empathy for the pain of dehumanized individuals and groups and with psychological and legal denial of their human rights and extreme violence against them. We hypothesize that ‘empathy’ for the pain and suffering of dehumanized social groups is automatically reduced because, as the research we review suggests, an individual''s neural mechanisms of pain empathy best respond to (or produce empathy for) the pain of people whom the individual automatically or implicitly associates with her or his own species. This theory has implications for the philosophical conception of ‘human’ and of ‘legal personhood’ in human rights jurisprudence. It further has implications for First Amendment free speech jurisprudence, including the doctrine of ‘corporate personhood’ and consideration of the potential harm caused by dehumanizing hate speech. We suggest that the new, social neuroscience of empathy provides evidence that both the vagaries of the legal definition or legal fiction of ‘personhood’ and hate speech that explicitly and implicitly dehumanizes may (in their respective capacities to artificially humanize or dehumanize) manipulate the neural mechanisms of pain empathy in ways that could pose more of a true threat to human rights and rights-based democracy than previously appreciated.     

浅谈非法证据的排除

非法证据的排除涉及惩罚犯罪和保障人权的关系问题。各国理论界对非法证据排除的观点因各自的价值取向不同而不可避免地带有各自的片面性。我国应当建立非法言词证据绝对排除规则,对非法采集物证的排除应赋予法官排除非法获得的物证的自由裁量权。     

畅歌太平繁华景，彰显世俗文人情——论柳永的歌咏太平之词

柳永《乐章集》中歌咏太平之词有28首。按内容可分为咏天下隆盛,博圣上欢心;赞地方盛景,取显宦青睐;绘节日胜景,颂世俗风情三部分。它歌咏了北宋太平之时的繁华,有很高的认识价值;它体现了柳永绘事写景高妙超凡、描象构图生动精致的功力,有较强的艺术价值;它展示了柳永世俗文人的独特心态呈现与心理运行轨迹,有比较重要的表现价值。     

马克思主义哲学体系特性的思考——兼论哲学何以言说

传统的马克思主义哲学体系言说模式误读和曲解了马克思哲学的精神实质.马克思主义哲学与其它哲学在言说方式上既有共性又有差别.本文从哲学言说方式的角度对马克思主义哲学体系的建构提出了几点思考,如系统性、简明性、准确性、生动性等.     

Voicing concerns: The balance between data protection principles and research developments in forensic speech science

The status of forensic speech recordings among existing data protection guidance is not clear. The inherent nature of voice and the way in which forensic speech casework is currently allocated mean that there are additional barriers to incorporating real casework data into research activities. The key objective of this work is to explore data protection solutions that could enable the forensic speech science community to responsibly use real casework data for research and development purposes. While reviewing relevant guidance and rulings, issues such as proportionality, opportunism and data minimisation are addressed, as well as where voice sits in relation to the definition of “biometric data”. This paper ultimately places forensic speech recordings in the data protection context to illuminate the specific issues that arise for this data type.