一个重大而紧迫的理论与实践课题——对发展新生代农民工入党问题的思考

在新生代农民工问题受到越来越多政治关注和社会关注的态势下,发展新生代农民工入党作为一个新的、重大而紧迫的课题也应该郑重提出来。发展新生代农民工入党的当务之急是:必须准确定位新生代农民工的生存状态,把握其群体性特征,透视新生代农民工对党的认同感,剖析新生代农民工入党的价值诉求,科学设定发展新生代农民工入党的战略举措。     

论美国《国家环境政策法》对完善我国环境法制的启示

美国《国家环境政策法》(1969)是一部在世界环境法立法史上占有重要地位的法律。它以一系列立法创新为美国当代环境法制建设奠定了基础。对于新时期的我国环境法制建设而言,美国《国家环境政策法》提供了具有战略意义的启示。这些启示主要体现在环境法制战略突破口的选择、观念更新、职能创新和制度创新四个紧密联系的重要方面。从这4个方面吸取美国《国家环境政策法》的有益经验,对于新时期我国环境法制的完善具有重要意义。     

战略合作伙伴关系和韩中自由贸易协定（FTA）

2008年韩中两国领导人宣布建立双边战略合作伙伴关系并推动韩中自由贸易协定的官方共同研究。韩中自由贸易协定将会成为东亚经济融合长期目标的一个主要步骤，并且它将会影响两国之间密切的经济合作。所以两国应该发展更有创造力和合作性的方法来顺利达成韩中自由贸易协定。从这个意义上来说，应当充分考虑EHP计划的复杂性和后续进程。     

战略劳动关系管理:内容、挑战及展望

劳动关系是劳资双方在劳动过程中构成的一种社会关系,它包括权利关系和利益关系两个方面,劳动争议中涉及的劳动关系是权利和利益兼有的关系.劳动关系包括三个范畴,即学术建设、解决实际问题、道德规范.劳动关系管理和人力资源管理对工作场所问题的研究都包含了雇主、员工和社会这三种视角,只是其侧重点不同.劳动关系管理是以上三种解决途径...     

中日双边互动的战略性思考

中国的和谐世界理念与日本外交战略的互动,表现为两国战略分歧与战略对话并存:中国坚持走和平发展道路与日本"普通国家论"阐释的大国化战略路径相异,导致两国业已存续的冲突与纷争时有显现、结构性矛盾日益突出,因而构筑基于共同战略利益的互惠关系成为发展双边关系的战略选择。寻求中日双边良性互动,要将两国关系置于国际体系的坐标中进行战略定位,在考量构建中日战略互惠关系相关因素的基础上,突破既往双边关系的局限性,理性调控中日战略互惠关系的互动及走向。     

公私部门战略管理影响机制的比较研究

战略管理的影响机制是指影响组织战略管理活动的各种因素,以及这些因素之间的交互关系。本文根据影响因素的来源和组织方式不同,具体分析了私营部门和公共部门战略管理的主要影响机制。通过公私部门战略管理影响机制的比较分析,旨在厘清公私部门战略管理的影响因素和过程机理的差异,进一步提升公共部门与私营部门战略管理的效率和水平。     

Polls,coalition signals and strategic voting: An experimental investigation of perceptions and effects

Polls and coalition signals can help strategic voters in multiparty systems with proportional representation and coalition governments to optimise their vote decision. Using a laboratory experiment embedded in two real election campaigns, this study focuses on voters' attention to and perception of polls and coalition signals. The manipulation of polls and coalition signals allows a causal test of their influence on strategic voting in a realistic environment. The findings suggest that active information acquisition to form fairly accurate perceptions of election outcomes can compensate for the advantage of high political sophistication. The theory of strategic voting is supported by the evidence, but only for a small number of voters. Most insincere vote decisions are explained by other factors. Thus, the common practice to consider all insincere voters as strategic is misleading.     

中央苏区时期与毛泽东思想的初步形成

毛泽东等老一辈革命家在领导中央红军开辟赣南、闽西中央苏区时期,成功地解决了指导中国革命的四个重大问题即:走什么路,建什么党,建什么军,遵循什么样的思想路线?从而初步构建了毛泽东思想科学体系的基本内涵和框架。其主要内涵为:一是开辟了中国革命新路——提出农村包围城市的革命道路理论;二是制定了思想建党、政治建军的基本纲领及其各项原则;三是确立了红军反"围剿"作战的积极防御战略方针;四是提出了"中国革命斗争的胜利要靠中国同志了解中国情况"的独立自主、实事求是思想路线。     

Groupthink and Terrorist Radicalization

Why do groups adopt terrorism? Major theories of terrorist radicalization assume it to be a rational process whereby groups select terrorism as the policy most likely to advance their goals. Not all terrorism is rational, however, and these theories cannot explain cases when groups pursue terrorism despite it being self-defeating. We distinguish between rational and irrational terrorism, and explain the latter using social psychology's groupthink mechanism. Although terrorists are widely assumed to be vulnerable to groupthink, empirical work on the phenomenon has focused overwhelmingly on decision-making by national executives. We firmly establish the link between groupthink and terrorist radicalization by tracing groupthink's operation through the development of the Weather Underground, an American terrorist group that emerged in the late 1960s and conducted six years of bombings against the U.S. government. All of the antecedent conditions, symptoms, and decision-making defects predicted by groupthink are evident in the Weather Underground, providing valuable evidence of the dangers of irrational radicalization and offering lessons for its prevention.     

The European Union's human security discourse: where are we now?

The language of human security has been prominent in the European Union's (EU) official discourse for a number of years. However, whilst it has been promoted as a new approach for the EU in the development of its security and defence policy, the aim of this article is to assess the extent to which it actually features in the EU's contemporary strategic discourse and practice. It seeks to uncover where and how the concept is spoken within the EU's institutional milieu, how it is understood by the relevant policy-makers in the EU and the implication of this across key areas of human security practice. It is argued in the article that human security has not been embedded as the driving strategic concept for Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) in an era of crisis and change in Europe and beyond and that the prospects for this materialising in the near future are rather thin.