关于起草我国国际私法法典的几点想法

国际私法带有“学说法”的特点,这主要是因它不是实体法,而是法律选择法——“间接法”所决定的。涉外民事法律适用总的指导原则的设立与实施始终是国际私法学中未解决的问题。在清点和检查我国已有法律适用法规定的基础上,进行新草案的起草、说明和论证显得尤为必要。     

马克思自然理论的批判向度及生态伦理建设启示

马克思的理论是我们正确处理和协调人与自然以及人与社会关系的科学的世界观和方法论,为我国生态伦理理论研究与实践指明了方向。     

略论西方悲剧理论形态的历史演进

西方悲剧理论先后经历了三个发展阶段。这三个阶段的悲剧理论也分别呈现出三种不同的理论形态。第一是古代的诗学悲剧理论阶段,诗学是其理论框架,戏剧悲剧是其研究对象。第二是近代的美学悲剧理论阶段,美学是其理论框架,悲剧性是其研究对象。第三是现代的文化学悲剧理论阶段,文化学是其理论框架,社会文化中的悲剧事件是其研究对象。     

哲学思潮对刑法犯罪论体系的影响

本文通过分析实证主义哲学、新康德哲学、存在主义哲学和功能主义社会学理论等各种哲学思潮对古典犯罪论体系、新古典犯罪论体系、目的论体系、新古典目的综合犯罪论体系等刑法犯罪论体系的影响,指出犯罪论体系发展的两条线索:一是犯罪人的主体性从罪责上溯到与构成要件要素之中,一是立法者的目的性从完全忽略上升到归入有责性判断之中。这二条线索,体现了价值论对犯罪论体系中的影响,揭示了刑法规范的主客观相统一因素,即刑法规范是客观犯罪事实和立法者主观目的的综合体现。     

Understanding Male Partner Violence Against Cohabiting and Married Women: An Empirical Investigation with a Synthesized Model

Based on research consistently showing that cohabitors are more likely to be violent than married couples, it is argued that the practice of equating these two marital status groups may obfuscate our understanding of the etiology of male partner violence against women. A synthesized model for understanding marital status differences is presented and tested on a large-scale representative sample of Canadian women. The results show little support for most existing explanations and suggest that unique processes are operating in the production of violence for different marital status groups. In addition to disaggregation by marital status, other directions for future research are discussed.     

犯罪论体系:功能、价值与实现途径辨析

犯罪论体系研究的是行为可罚性的一般之法律要件。各国犯罪论体系在形式上各有千秋,在功能与价值取向上,都是为司法者提供一套判断犯罪的基本思维方法,为罪与非罪判断提供共通的标准,防止司法擅断,实现实质正义,在实现路径上则是殊途同归。     

对社区警务产生重要影响的有关研究及理论

社区警务的兴起有其特定的历史背景 ,特别是有着大量的实践研究以及相关理论为基础。对社区警务产生重要影响的研究有对巡逻密度作用的研究、对快速反应作用的研究、对刑事侦查效率的研究及单元巡区警务的一些做法 ;相关的理论有日常活动理论和破窗理论。     

我国亲权制度构建的理论思考

亲权是父母基于其身份所有的权利义务,它以保护教养未成年子女为目的,是父母子女权利义务关系中的核心内容。现代社会中的亲权,不仅是一项权利,也是一项义务。亲权制度在很多国家的立法中都有体现,它是区别于监护的一种有存在价值的制度。在我国当代法律、法规中,对亲权的概念未与采纳,也没有完备的亲权制度,但可以找到亲权理论的相关内容。本文拟从理论层面阐释对此问题的思考,以期对我国亲权制度构建有所启示。     

Culture and theater as foundation for national identity formation in the Russian far east: where Europe meets Asia

Although most contemporary theories of nationalism and identity formation rest on some form of social constructivism, few theorists of nationalism and identity formation interrogate social constructivism as a social construction – a social science concept “imposed” on the non-self-consciously constructivist behaviors of people, who generally do not believe they are engaging in construction. Since social constructivism – unless it is a metaphysics about what is real – is really about the concept of social construction, the first task of constructivists is to ask not how various populations have engaged in social construction but how social construction should be defined. As this article shows, constructivism is at best a run-of-the-mill theoretical approach – perfectly respectable, but no different from any other theoretical approach in the social sciences. It is only when social constructivism makes outlandishly radical claims – that all of reality or all of social reality is constructed – that it is unusual, exciting, and wrong.     

Lessons from Philosophy? Interdisciplinary Justice Research and Two Classes of Justice Judgments

More and more scholars of social justice have been calling for a closer collaboration between empirical and normative disciplines. Psychological and sociological research, as well as philosophical theories can, so they claim, learn from one another and work should be based on results obtained in the other fields of research. Some political philosophers do not share this view. They argue that, since most empirical research does not capture people's moral views on justice, its results cannot be of any value to their theories. Based on this critique I suggest in the first part of this paper that empirical research should distinguish between two classes of justice judgments: First, justice judgments in a narrow sense, which are made under conditions of impartiality and grounded in moral principles, and second, justice attitudes, which differ from other types of social attitudes only in their attitude objects. In the second part I present a quasi-experimental study that aimed at testing the two different classes of justice judgments empirically. The results show that justice judgments in the narrow sense can be obtained even under conditions in which complex experimental manipulations cannot be employed. In the third part of this paper I hypothesize that justice judgments which are based on the two formal criteria provided by political philosophy (impartiality and reference to moral principles) may serve as important intervening variables when trying to explain the impact of justice beliefs on different patterns of human behavior.