论交通肇事罪中的“因逃逸致人死亡”

在对刑法第133条交通肇事罪中"因逃逸致人死亡"的理解上,刑法理论及实务界存在着诸多分歧与争议.文章从主客观相结合的解释论立场出发,对该规定可能的语义内涵和罪过形式进行了深入的剖析,并在此基础上,对司法实践中相关情形的定罪量刑作出了分门别类的澄清.     

谈道路交通安全立法

我国实行改革开放以来,道路交通迅速发展,对经济、社会发展发挥了重要的推动作用。但是,从总体上看,道路交通发展与经济、社会发展不适应,道路交通安全形势严峻,城市道路拥堵问题日趋严重,在一定程度上制约了经济的发展。因此,以法律规范道路交通安全管理刻不容缓。《道路交通安全法》的颁布是中国道路交通法制建设历程中的一座里程碑,是中国道路交通事业全面走向法治时代的崭新开端。     

现代化与犯罪--社会控制中介论

犯罪增长与经济发展和现代化之间是否存在着必然联系?作者认为犯罪增长这一社会现象与现代化、经济发展、社会转型之间的确具有一定的联系,但它不是线性相关关系,不是简单的"代价"关系,他们二者之间的关系是间接的、不确定的,必须通过一个"中介"而发生,这个中介就是"社会控制".因此,在新形势下,如何利用经济发展的成果改善和加强社会控制是解决犯罪问题的关键.     

略论流动人口社会治安综合治理

在市场经济条件下,流动人口的管理无疑是一项艰巨复杂的社会系统工程.如何适应市场经济发展的要求,建立健全流动人口社会治安综合治理机制,加强对策性研究,仍然是当前流动人口管理的重点问题.流动人口的管理涉及到诸多部门和行业,应该建立一个统一的具有权威性的综合治理机制.     

论交通肇事逃逸致人死亡案件的定性

交通肇事逃逸致人死亡的案件比较复杂,刑法中规定了交通肇事"逃逸致人死亡"的,构成交通肇事罪的加重情节,但肇事逃逸致人死亡存在构成不作为故意杀人罪的情形.     

有组织犯罪的成因及对策

现阶段,我国带黑社会性质的有组织犯罪呈逐年上升之势。有组织犯罪的产生有其深刻的社 会原因。根治有组织犯罪的对策不能过于单一,更不是仅靠“严打”所能解决的,必须采取 多方位的综合措施。     

略论传统中国的乡村控制与村社结构

本对传统中国的乡村控制和村社结构进行了简略评述,认为在传统中国,专制国家虽然希望把自己的权力延伸到乡村社会之中,但受交通、通讯和行政管理水平的限制,在事实上不得不利用乡村社会中的权威资源实施支配与控制。地方精英的成份和功能十分复杂,不能简单地用“自治权”、“士绅社会”等概念加以概括。乡村社会的权力结构是由建立在血缘关系和地缘关系基础上的各种组织机构和个人关系构成的,对此必须综合地、辩证地加以理解。     

新形势下治安管理社会化的新探索

组织和发动群众参与治安工作,是我国公安工作的特色和优势所在,是适应治安形势变化、改变群防群治弱化状态、缓解治安管理任务繁重与警力不足的需要.可采取聘用"联防钟点工",吸引群众直接参与治安工作;将现有的专职联防队逐步过渡到理顺体制的保安队,改善群防群治队伍的成员结构,提高治安管理辅助力量的个体素质等措施,以提高整个治安主体的战斗力.     

Belgium's Anti-Sect War

Since the suicide—homicide of 53 members of the Order of the Solar Temple in 1994 and the gas attempt by Aum Shinrikyo in Tokyo's subway in 1995, a number of European states have decided to fight against sects. France and Belgium are in the forefront of this battle. Both countries have set up official observatories of sects and state agencies involving various ministries to combat them. Preventive policies targeting sects are being carried out. In Belgium, the Anthroposophic Society, a philosophical movement listed as 1 of 189 sects suspected of being dangerous, has sued one federal entity that printed unfounded accusations against their movement in a widely distributed brochure against sects. The same Anthoposophic Society has also petitioned the Court of Arbitration to have the law establishing an observatory of sects annuled. This report deals with both legal actions.     

Is Partner Aggression Related to Appraisals of Coercive Control by a Partner?

Research and clinical reports on men who are aggressive towards their intimate partners find that these men tend to behave in highly controlling ways towards such partners (e.g., restricting their social interactions, monitoring of activities, and reducing decision-making power). This study tests the hypothesis that men and women in violent dating relationships appraise such behaviors differently than individuals in nonviolent relationships. Based on clinical and empirical partner abuse literature, 119 college students rated the extent to which they perceived hypothetical behaviors towards a partner as controlling. Results suggest that individuals who had either engaged in or received partner aggression appraised restrictive, domineering, and coercive behaviors from a male to a female partner, and from a female to a male partner as less controlling than individuals who had neither perpetrated nor received partner aggression. Men also viewed those behaviors as less controlling than did women. Generalizability, clinical implications, and directions for future research are discussed.