新媒体时代公安机关构建警务公共关系的思考

新媒体时代环境下，媒体与当前中国社会的转型升级呈螺旋上升趋势，这要求公安民警要不断学习掌握专业技能，统筹运用各平台以构建和谐警务公共关系，同时须正确认识新媒体的影响力，提防步入多种误区：如避免因疏忽出现不当言论，造成负面影响；避免为追求表面和谐而违规执法；避免走上过分依赖新媒体的极端。此外，还需注意保护新媒体平台的专属帐号安全。     

交通警察网络公共关系的构建

文章从公共关系的基本理论出发,论述了交通警察网络公共关系的基本内涵,对交通警察网络公共关系的构建进行了初步的探讨,旨在将公共关系理论与公安交通管理工作相结合,创造和谐的警民关系,进一步提高交通管理水平。     

公共政策实验室:21世纪的综合政策分析环境

运用公共政策理论、系统方法论和现代信息技术 ,建构公共政策实验室 ,能够有效地弥补我国现实公共政策制定中社会参与的组织化程度低、各种利益的表达和沟通不充分等体制与机制性缺陷。本文以北京交通拥堵问题为例 ,提出了公共政策实验室的概念 ,对公共政策实验室的人员构成和政策实验过程进行了初步探讨 ,最后分析了其作用和价值。     

查明事实、分清是非原则重述

“查明事实、分清是非”是民事诉讼法规定的法院调解应当遵循的原则之一,确立这一原则是为了保障司法调解的公正性。这一原则当下正受到理论和实务界的强烈质疑。我国是以法院为中心规定诉讼调解制度的,法院调解并非诉讼上的和解。调解在性质上仍然是法院的审判行为,调解与判决一样都是完成民事诉讼法所规定任务的手段,加之当事人期待接近裁判的调解结果以及调审合一的程序模式、法院调解的经验教训,这一原则的正当性和必要性具有理论和实践的依据。法院立案调解、对事实存疑案件调解所取得的成功,均不能成为否定该原则的理由。除非将法院调解置换为诉讼上和解,否则继续保留这一原则就有充分的理由。     

Recognition and understanding of goals and roles: The key internal features of mental health court teams

The increasing involvement of people with mental illness in the criminal justice system has led to the formation of specialty programs such as mental health courts (hereafter MHCs). We discuss MHCs and the teams serving these courts. Specifically, we examine team members' perceptions of MHC goals and their own and others' roles on the MHC team. Using a semi-structured interview instrument, we conducted 59 face-to-face interviews with criminal justice and mental health treatment personnel representing 11 Ohio MHCs. Findings from our qualitative data analyses reveal that MHC personnel understand individuals' roles within the teams, recognize and appreciate the importance of different roles, and share common goals. MHCs could foster this level of understanding and agreement by working to recruit and retain individuals with experience in or willingness to learn about both the criminal justice and mental health systems. Future research should explore the impact of MHC team functioning on client outcomes.     

“IF I COULD TELL THE JUDGE SOMETHING ABOUT ATTACHMENT. . . .” PERSPECTIVES ON ATTACHMENT THEORY IN THE FAMILY LAW COURTROOM

This article gathers diverse attachment specialists in a far reaching conversation about the utility of attachment assessment and theory for complex family law decision making, and reflections on the thorny question, “If I were the judge . . .?” Inge Bretherton, Professor Emerita, Developmental Psychology at Wisconsin University, is one of a few attachment researchers in the Bowlby/Ainsworth tradition to have completed studies in the divorce field. Seligman, a psychoanalyst and clinical psychologist, Solomon, a clinical psychologist and researcher, and Crowell, professor of psychiatry and psychology, take on some large controversies, and offer well over 100 years combined experience of applying attachment knowledge in complex family matters.     

THE “EYE OF THE BEHOLDER”: PROFESSIONAL OPINIONS ABOUT THE BEST INTERESTS OF A CHILD

Child custody evaluations (CCEs) are a central feature of parenting litigation in many North American jurisdictions. However, there has been little recent research comparing CCE decisions about children's interests with decisions made by judges. This article presents empirical research about the extent to which Ontario judges accept custody and access recommendations from CCEs employed by Ontario's Office of the Children's Lawyer. The central finding was that the judges fully agreed with the CCEs only about half of the time. Possible explanations for this finding are explored, the most salient of which is the effect of delay in Ontario family litigation. In conclusion, the article suggests that a more efficient synthesis of the judicial and CCE decision‐making processes might be more consonant with the best interests of children involved in these disputes.     

民事审理的集中化研究——以庭审程序为中心

庭审是集中审理的关键,集中审理的主要内容是在开庭审理中得以落实的,审理是否实现了集中化也主要是在开庭审理阶段体现出来。对于我国是否实现了审理的集中化,还存在比较大的争议。但我国立法上并没有严格区分审前程序和庭审程序,虽然有些案件表现出来的是只经过一次庭审即告终结,但这实际上是建立在多次"非正式开庭"基础上的。而且由于"非正式开庭"喧宾夺主成为法官获取案件信息的主要渠道,开庭本身都不具有实质意义,就更谈不上有集中、连续地开庭审理的可能。有鉴于此,为了实现审理的集中化,就需要对现有的开庭审理程序进行改革和完善。     

驾驶人基于感知判断反应错误引发的事故分析

机动车驾驶人的驾车过程是一个复杂的心理过程,其中尤为重要的是感知、判断、反应三个环节,其中任何一个环节出现差错都有可能导致道路交通事故的发生。分析机动车驾驶人的感知错误、判断错误和反应不恰当与道路交通事故之间存在的关系,有助于提高机动车驾驶人驾驶技术和应变能力,从而达到预防和减少道路交通事故的目的。     

A traffic accident caused by fatigue failure of axle

An investigation of a traffic accident involving a tractor-trailer and a passenger car that were traveling at high speed is presented. The cause was the fracture of a trailer axle. The investigation showed that the fracture was because of the fatigue failure. In addition, cracks were found in the remaining three trailer wheels. Hardness measurements showed that, because of inadequate heat treatment of the metal, they were prone to failure.