论依法执政与依法治国

依法执政是依法治国的关键,依法治国为依法执政提供制度和理念上的保障。准确把握二者的关系,有助于推动我国的社会主义民主和法制建设。     

公安院校警体运动损伤现状调查

运动损伤是指在体育运动过程中发生的损伤,它与体育运动项目、运动技术动作、锻炼者的身体状况、场地设备等情况有着密切的关系。通过两所高校警体运动损伤现状调查分析,发现警体运动中重度伤主要是因学生参与运动比赛和课外锻炼而产生,中度伤则主要是擒敌课和运动比赛产生的;各类警体运动损伤发生的部位与运动项目的特点有着密切的联系;警体运动损伤类型以挫伤、擦伤、扭伤和拉伤为主。     

简论警察网络应对中的在线介入与离线防控——以美国为例谈网络作为维护社会稳定的重要"场域"

网络之于现实社会的巨大影响仍在快速发展和不断被认识中,其作为现实社会显现或潜在的巨大力量,也正被各国政府、营运企业及技术、法律各界高度关注。问题的焦点之一,即如何有效"规制"网络世界中那些与现实世界密切关联的方面,特别是那些于现实主流社会有巨大影响甚至是颠覆性影响的问题。以警察直接防范、打击的专业架构看,"在线介入"与"离线防控"的双重应对是一个思路。"在线介入",即"在线"的规制与干预,"离线防控",即落地的预防与控制。警察必须既作业于网络社会又作业于现实社会,既深入于"彼岸"又深入于"此岸",既是网络警察又是现实警察,既执行维护虚拟社会秩序的责任又执行维护现实社会秩序的责任!警察非于传统警务架构方面做出最大限度的跟进,才能适应这一全新的非传统的警务巨变。     

强化政府法制监督的必要性和对策研究

政府法制监督是我国监督制度的重要组成部分。强化政府法制监督是实现依法治国和顺应民主法制建设的客观要求,是无限政府向有限政府转变的必然要求,是防止行政权被滥用、保护公民合法权益的有力保障。推动政府法制监督应加强对规章和规范性文件的监督,加强对行政执法的监督,把依法行政贯穿于行政管理的各个环节。     

论《水浒传》梁山聚义的起因、性质和结局

《水浒传》中梁山英雄们进行的是一次自发的对上层统治集团的暴力反抗活动，不是一场有预先准备，精心组织的农民起义，他们被“逼上梁山”，从个体来看，大多并不是由于朝廷的压迫，而是由于自身的原因或为梁山集团所逼，但是从群体的角度来看，这么多人被逼上梁山，仍然反映了深刻的社会危机，从这一角度来看，《水浒传》仍然表达了“官逼民反”的思想，只是这“民”主要是流民阶层，正是由于其流民集团的性质，导致其最后走上失败之路，因此，梁山招安就具有必然性。     

Thyreoglobulin and violent asphyxia

The concentration of thyreoglobulin (tg) was determined for death caused by hanging, strangulation by ligature, and throttling. Cases of sudden death (traumatic aortic rupture, penetrating wounds of the heart) were used for comparison. The mean values in cases of hanging (149.9±202.3 ng/ml), strangulation by ligature (193.1±173.3), manual strangulation (561.6±173.9) are distinguishable from violent acute deaths (23.3±27.6) and living healthy individuals (17.3±16.1). By means of statistical comparisons, significant differences were found between throttling and strangulation by ligature and between throttling and hanging (adjusted P<0.001). In connection with examination of the bodies high tg values can be regarded as a vital reaction in obstructive asphyxia.     

积极探索提高党依法执政能力的实现形式

中国共产党在55年长期的革命和改革实践中,逐步形成了一整套执政方式和领导方法。随着社会主义市场经济的确定和发展,党所处的地位和环境、党肩负的历史使命、党的自身状况等,都发生了新的变化。及时总结执政方式和领导方法上的经验教训,根据新的实践加以改革、创新,对全面建设小康社会,推进中国特色社会主义事业,具有极其重要的意义。     

Linking self- and social control with deviance: Illuminating the structure underlying a general theory of crime and its relation to deviant activity

The present paper operationalizes and empirically tests the most recent theoretical speculations of Hirschi and Gottfredson regarding an individual level characteristic of self-control and its relation to earlier specifications of control theory as well as the literature on personality. Linkages are drawn between their broad delineation of self-control and personal disorders of hyperactivity, impulsivity, attention deficits, and minor conduct problems. Psychologists disagree about whether such disorders represent single or multiple traits and whether both behavioral and cognitive measures can appropriately depict personality characteristics. Employing structural equation techniques, support for several propositions derived from Gottfredson and Hirschi's thesis is found: Self-control subsumes several personality disorders and is significantly comprised by early behavioral indicators of aggression and fighting, is inversely related to other elements of the social bond, is moderately stable over a short period of time, and significantly predicts criminal convictions. However, questions remain regarding the ubiquity of self-control, the magnitude and meaning of stability, and the power of this perspective to explain all forms of self-reported delinquency.     

DOES CRIME JUST MOVE AROUND THE CORNER? A CONTROLLED STUDY OF SPATIAL DISPLACEMENT AND DIFFUSION OF CRIME CONTROL BENEFITS*

Recent studies point to the potential theoretical and practical benefits of focusing police resources on crime hot spots. However, many scholars have noted that such approaches risk displacing crime or disorder to other places where programs are not in place. Although much attention has been paid to the idea of displacement, methodological problems associated with measuring it have often been overlooked. We try to fill these gaps in measurement and understanding of displacement and the related phenomenon of diffusion of crime control benefits. Our main focus is on immediate spatial displacement or diffusion of crime to areas near the targeted sites of an intervention. Do focused crime prevention efforts at places simply result in a movement of offenders to areas nearby targeted sites—“do they simply move crime around the corner”? Or, conversely, will a crime prevention effort focusing on specific places lead to improvement in areas nearby—what has come to be termed a diffusion of crime control benefits? Our data are drawn from a controlled study of displacement and diffusion in Jersey City, New Jersey. Two sites with substantial street‐level crime and disorder were targeted and carefully monitored during an experimental period. Two neighboring areas were selected as “catchment areas” from which to assess immediate spatial displacement or diffusion. Intensive police interventions were applied to each target site but not to the catchment areas. More than 6,000 20‐minute social observations were conducted in the target and catchment areas. They were supplemented by interviews and ethnographic field observations. Our findings indicate that, at least for crime markets involving drugs and prostitution, crime does not simply move around the corner. Indeed, this study supports the position that the most likely outcome of such focused crime prevention efforts is a diffusion of crime control benefits to nearby areas.     

社会危害性在犯罪构成理论中的地位探析

目前在刑法学界存在着社会危害性理论备受指责的现象,有的学者甚至认为应将社会危害性逐出我国的犯罪构成理论。这是不科学的。我们应该运用立体动态思维的方式正确分析犯罪概念、犯罪构成与罪刑法定主义的关系,不但要保留社会危害性的地位,更重要的是将其明确作为一个独立的犯罪成立的条件,这样才是对传统犯罪构成理论批判性的发展。