侵权法一般条款的保护范围

侵权法一般条款的立法模式及其保护范围是侵权立法中的重要问题。从比较法上看,德国法之规定与法国法之规定各有其优劣,但德国法更具借鉴意义。我国侵权立法,应认真总结以往立法及司法的成功经验,坚持已有的成熟做法,确立符合我国国情的立法模式。我国侵权责任法应通过一般条款列举具体的权利及利益保护范围,同时规定兜底条款,而不应从规定损害概念的角度界定侵权法的保护范围。     

欧盟就业男女平等政策浅析

20世纪70年代至21世纪初,欧共体/欧盟发展了由指令、建议和行动项目构成的相互关联又递进发展的就业男女平等政策。“同工同酬”到“等值同酬”之政策变化的案例诠释,反映了欧盟逐步把社会性别平等的内在涵义纳入其社会政策,并使之在共同体和成员国两个层面上并存、互动而呈现引导性强于约束性的“软政策”特征。这些成功经验之外,“不规则就业”、未被政策充分覆盖的“无酬劳动”和“家庭劳动”等,仍是欧盟部分成员国女性劳动参与的主要形式,对女性发展尚存制约作用。     

论加强公法整体研究的现实意义

由于公法所具有的强烈时代性与地域性以及公法所涉及问题的复杂性,决定了公法研究必须带着问题意识,就公法建设中存在的矛盾和困难有针对性地加强系统性的整体研究。本文认为,就目前中国现实国情而言,加强公法整体研究的意义集中体现于四个方面,即政治意义在于促进宪政建设,法治意义在于尊重和保障人权,社会意义在于推进制度反腐败建设,学术意义在于促进公法规范协调发展。而无论是宪政建设、尊重和保障人权以及制度反腐败的实现,必须依赖于一国公法制度规范的总体设计和协调整合,这正是加强公法整体研究学术价值之所在。     

关于儒学价值观普世性问题的思考

即使是在“全球化”的当今,作为中国文化传统核心的儒学,仍有其普世性价值。     

浅析反不正当竞争法的一般条款

1993年颁布的《反不正当竞争法》,它的制定与实施为我国建立统一、公正的市场竞争秩序提供了法律依据。然而,随着市场自身的快速发展,这些具体的规定已经无法全面、有效地规范市场竞争秩序,这就要求我们要重新认识《反不正当竞争法》,制定一个一般条款。经济法最本质的内容就是国家与经济之间的关系问题,因此,国家应在大力发展商品经济的同时,充分发挥市场机制的作用,在此基础上,恰当地发挥国家职能,对经济进行必要的、合理的干预。     

俄罗斯联邦检察机关的“一般监督”职能及其对我国的启示

1922年5月28日,当时的苏维埃俄国通过了《俄罗斯社会主义联邦苏维埃共和国检察机关条例》,首次赋予检察机关以"一般监督"职能。自此之后,检察机关的"一般监督"职能得以继承和发展。目前,检察机关的"一般监督"职能,在俄罗斯联邦检察机关的检察监督职能中仍然占据首要地位,並在发现和消除行政执法过程中许多行政违法行为(作为或不作为)方面,发挥着举足轻重的作用。考察和研究俄罗斯联邦检察机关"一般监督"职能的历史发展、主要内容和实践效果,对我国具有重要的启示意义。     

Rethinking the one-stop-shop mechanism: Legal certainty and legitimate expectation

This paper aims to contribute to the discussion concerning the one-stop-shop mechanism proposed in the General Data Protection Regulation (hereinafter “GDPR”). The choice of regulation as the instrument to legislate on data protection is already an unmistakable indication that unification and simplification (together with respect of data subjects' interests) shall be the guide for every legal discussion on the matter. The one-stop-shop mechanism (hereinafter “OSS”) clearly reflects the unification and simplification which the reform aims for. We believe that OSS is logically connected with the idea of one Data Protection Authority (hereinafter “DPA”) with an exclusive jurisdiction and that this can only mean that, given one controller, no other DPA can be a competent authority.² In other words, OSS implies a single and comprehensive competent authority of a given controller. In our analysis we argue that such architecture: a) works well with the “consistency mechanism”; b) provides guarantees to data subjects for a clear allocation of powers (legal certainty); and c) is not at odds with the complaint lodging procedure. Our position on fundamental questions is as follows. What is the perimeter of competence of the DPA in charge? We believe that it should have enforcement power on every issue of the controller, including issuing the fines. How to reconcile such dominant role of one DPA with the principle of co-operation among DPAs? We do not consider co-operation at odds with the rule that decisions are taken by just one single authority. Finally, we share some suggestions on how to make the jurisdiction allocation mechanism (the main establishment criterion) more straightforward.     

各利益相关者在医院与社区双向转诊合作中的责任与机制简

针对目前双向转诊中信息不能共享、药品获得和费用报销障碍、社区人力服务水平相对较差等问题,从双向转诊中各利益相关者角度分析在双向转诊实施过程中政府、医疗机构（医院与社区卫生服务机构）、患者与家属各自应当承担的责任,提出相应的措施及改进机制。     

Impediments besetting the negotiations for a comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement between the European Union and East and Southern Africa (2007–2014)

Several African, Caribbean and Pacific countries are currently negotiating World Trade Organization (WTO)-compatible reciprocal economic partnership agreements (EPAs) with the European Union (EU), agreements intended to supersede the one-sided trade preferences of the Lomé Convention. This study focuses on impediments which have bedevilled the EU–East and Southern Africa (ESA) negotiations for a transition from an interim EPA to a comprehensive EPA. These talks, which ran from 2007 to 2014, followed the expiry of a WTO waiver and the ESA's successful resistance to elements of the EU's agenda considered offensive, despite envisaged benefits provided for by the Cotonou Partnership Agreement of 2000 calling for EPAs. The study is based on qualitative primary research in which data from interviews was augmented by a synthesis of secondary sources and analysed through a thematic coding system. Findings reveal asymmetrical power relations, a marked heterogeneity in the ESA and outstanding issues in the interim EPA and WTO regulations as major impediments to the transition to a comprehensive EPA.     

iCLIC Data Mining and Data Sharing workshop: The present and future of data mining and data sharing in the EU

Held at Southampton University's Highfield campus and hosted by iCLIC, an interdisciplinary core on Law, the Internet and Culture, the Data Mining and Data Sharing workshop brought together attendees and speakers from industry, government, academia and a range of disciplines alike. The workshop comprised two sessions, each with a keynote and an associated panel. The first session was chaired by Eleonora Rosati and dealt with copyright and database rights, data mining and data sharing. The second session, chaired by Sophie Stalla-Bourdillon, focussed on data protection, data mining and data sharing. The following report covers both sessions, associated panel discussions and the subsequent question and answer sessions.