工人阶级要带头实践“三个代表”思想

工人阶级作为党的阶级基础 ,要带头实践江泽民同志提出的“三个代表”重要思想 ,其主要途径是 :坚定共产主义信念 ,坚决执行党的基本路线 ,做“两个文明”建设的主力军 ,做党联系人民群众的纽带。     

阶层认同研究综述

在当下社会转型的加速期,有关阶层认同的研究已成为我国社会各界关注的热点。文章详细阐述了目前阶层认同研究的理论基础、研究策略,并对当前研究进行了评价。     

试论加强和改进非公有制企业的工会工作

当前 ,在非公有制企业组建工会不仅是一项重要而紧迫的任务 ,而且也是客观需要。首先 ,是巩固党的阶级基础和执政地位的需要。因为中国工人阶级是党的阶级基础 ;其次 ,是确立和巩固社会主义基本经济制度 ,引导非公有制企业健康发展的需要 ;再次 ,是维护职工利益 ,保持社会稳定的需要。     

大学生班干部现状分析

大学生班干部是大学校园中非常重要的群体，是辅导员和班主任的助手，更是班风、学风的领跑者。但近年逐渐出现班干部频繁更换，没人愿意当班干部的问题。纠其原因主要在于班干部所处的环境压力大以及欠缺自我奉献精神。了解到此情况后，班主任对班委成员进行了引导，使此现象有所改善，班干部队伍现已趋于稳定，且已呈现出良好的班风和学风.     

中国中产阶级的政治态度分析简

本文综述了当前中国中产阶级政治态度的研究成果,其结论是,从整体而言,中产阶级的政治态度不积极且体制内和体制外的中产阶级政治态度存在较大差异.在此基础上分析了当前中产阶级政治态度形成的原因,提出了培育和引导中产阶级政治态度的时策.     

党建理论的新发展

江泽民“七一”讲话将实现先进性与群众性结合思想提升到了马克思主义党建基本理论的位置,充分继承了我党建设史上关于二者结合的宝贵经验,并在结合实际的基础上对马克思主义关于党的性质理论进行了发展。     

The Bundling of Similar Interests in Litigation. The Incentives for Class Action and Legal Actions taken by Associations

The European directive 98/27/EC of 15 of May 1998 widens the scope of action for consumer interests. The new directive follows the green book on the rights of the consumer of 11 June 1993. The necessity to transform this directive into national law has led to discussions on whether it is advisable to generally expand the scope of liability for widespread damages. Should the possibilities to collect damages for consumer associations and to establish new forms of bundling similar interests in cases of civil liability be widened? This article deals with economic consequences of such forms of bundling with a focus on the class action and actions by associations. The American discussion on the merits of class action is not very encouraging and does not lead to proposing far reaching legal innovations for European countries in this field. It seems however that some of the adverse effects of class action can be avoided by slightly different forms of bundling.     

Old wine in new bottles? Reassessing the effects of globalisation on political preferences in Western Europe

In both public and scholarly debates, globalisation has recently been accredited with a massive impact on the political preferences and electoral behaviour of Western citizens. Some go as far as to declare a new cleavage between winners and losers of globalisation, driven, for example, by individuals’ exposure to international competition and their degree of national as opposed to cosmopolitan identification. Extant tests of this argument have, however, relied on class and education as proxies for these processes. In contrast, this study provides a direct test of the influence of the globalisation processes on attitudes to economic distribution, the European Union and immigration as well as on vote choice across nine West European countries. The results show that variables tapping the core aspects of globalisation have relatively little impact on attitudes and vote choice; are largely unable to account for the effects of class and education; and do not seem to lead to the establishment of new divisions between winners and losers within or across classes. Rather, the winners and losers of globalisation seem to be the traditional winners and losers with respect to material positions and political influence in modern Western societies – that is, those placed higher as opposed to lower in the class and education hierarchies. In this way, the proposed cleavage between winners and losers of globalisation may seem to be rather much like old wine in new bottles.     

Political Sociology of International Interventions: Peacebuilders and the Ground

ABSTRACT

This special issue, instead of questioning what effect peacebuilding interventions have on post-conflict societies, analyses what the ground of intervention does to peacebuilders. It demonstrates that everyday interactions on the ground shape the interveners and even the scope of their missions. We delineate how a political sociology approach might break away from binaries (‘internationals/locals’) and, instead, illuminate processes (of internationalization and localization). We intend to offer a political sociology of the ‘intervention encounter’, that is, to scrutinize the everyday interactions among peacebuilders and between peacebuilders and domestic actors, and to investigate effects of the ground on peacebuilding organizations, doctrines and decision-making processes, as well as on peacebuilders’ trajectories, positions, professional practices and representations. In fine, we explore how peacebuilders’ relations to the ground structure the socio-professional field of peacebuilding.     

从权利救济宪法保障论公益诉讼制度

在各国宪法上,都会规定权利救济基本权的保障,其作用是在于给予人民排除不法侵害权益,并维护享有完整实体权利的机会,借以实现有权利即有救济的宪法保障原则。就行政诉讼而言,原则上虽须主张其诉讼和其个人权利有关,人民或团体才可享有诉权,但是,立法者另外得以法律明文规定,准许人民或团体为维护公益,对无关自己权益的事项提起行政诉讼,此时人民或团体也可享有诉权。在此,我们看到宪法上保障的权利救济基本权,除了作为主观权利的功能建构外,仍然存在作为客观法的建构可能性。也就是说,公益诉讼是立法者为了落实权利救济基本权的宪法保障,所设计的一种客观的制度性保障,而可以作为权利救济基本权在客观法上的功能建构。因此,本论文即从自我实现作为基本权的本质出发,尝试探讨基本权作为主观权利与客观法的法特征及其功能,建构公益诉讼作为权利救济的制度性保障,并借助德国行政诉讼上的团体诉讼制度,以分析公益诉讼在制度设计上的根本困境。