浅议间接正犯的范围

间接正犯的成立范围主要是由被利用者行为的范围决定,即被利用者的哪些行为能够被幕后者用作实施犯罪意图的工具。间接正犯中的工具行为应当具备＂非正犯性＂和＂可支配性＂两个条件。     

理想与现实的交织——美国毒品外交的兴起及其外延与内涵评析

美国毒品外交是20世纪之初美国大国外交的内容之一。伴随着美国毒品外交政策的实施,以多边合作为特征的国际禁毒运动也应运而生。美国毒品外交除了具有理想主义外交的独特外延,更有着其强烈追求国家利益以及服从国家战略需要的内涵所在。对外延与内涵两个方面予以考察,应是探析美国毒品外交乃至整个美国外交政策的一个不容忽视的重要视点。     

共有物返还诉讼若干问题研究

共有物返还诉讼涉及到诉讼标的、当事人适格、诉讼形态、既判力等诸多问题,目前祖国大陆学者对此少有论述,对于有关问题的认识也存在较大的差异。我国《物权法》上虽然有关于共有的规定,但却没有规定共有物返还请求权究竟如何行使以及行使的效力如何。如何对共有人权利予以保护,期待我国法律有更明确、更细化的规定。     

树立法制理念 促进和谐社会建设

每个社会成员应牢固树立社会主义法治理念，时刻以法律为准绳，规范自己的行为，遵纪守法，促进社会和谐。     

合同诈骗罪的主体要件探讨

我国1997年刑法增设了合同诈骗罪,其目的是适应社会主义市场经济发展和司法实践中遏制这类犯罪的需要,是加强对合同诈骗的打击力度的需要。文章从合同诈骗罪与普通诈骗罪的法条竞合关系的适用等方面进行探讨,认为打击合同诈骗罪应从合同诈骗罪的主体构成要件上加以限定,从立法上加以完善。     

日本公民馆与公共精神的培育

社会资本存在于人们相互交往而形成的关系网络中。公民参与网络是社会资本的重要组成部分,它是社会中公共精神培育的重要载体。日本公民馆促进了公民参与网络的构建,增加了民众间的社会资本,培育了公民的公共精神即平等精神、自治精神、参与精神。     

Assessing the European Union’s strategic capacity: the case of EUNAVFOR MED Operation Sophia

This article argues that the European Union’s capacity to use an operational instrument for the purpose of an articulated objective constitutes an important, but conceptually neglected and empirically underexplored, element of its actorness. In order to fill this gap, the article introduces the concept of strategic capacity and develops an analytical framework for systematic empirical assessments thereof. Drawing on 22 qualitative expert interviews, the framework is applied to the EU’s maritime operation against human smugglers in the Central Mediterranean (EUNAVFOR MED Operation Sophia). The article finds that the EU so far has displayed a fairly low degree of strategic capacity in its fight against human smugglers. The article argues that this fairly low degree of strategic capacity is not to be ascribed to an institutional apparatus that is unfit for strategic action, but a decision on the part of political decision-makers to give weight to symbolic, as opposed to strategic, action. As a result, the operation has contributed little to the formal objective of disrupting and dismantling human smuggling networks in the Central Mediterranean. In some areas, it has even had an adverse effect on this objective.     

Idealism,realism, and immigration: David Miller’s Strangers in Our Midst

David Miller’s Strangers in Our Midst is an important contribution to the debate among political philosophers about how liberal democratic states should deal with the issue of migration. But it is also a thoughtful statement concerning how best to do political philosophy and, as such, contributes also to the growing debate within Anglo-American political theory about the relative merits of ‘ideal’ versus ‘non-ideal’ normative theorising. Miller’s argument in the book builds on his earlier published work in suggesting that political philosophy should be ‘for Earthlings’: it should not be understood as a process of ideal theorising which ignores political reality. He argues that normative theorists should seek to resolve complex political problems by taking seriously the political context that makes these problems complex, rather than putting aside that context in the interests of deriving first principles. This is a controversial approach, which requires political philosophers to take more seriously than they often do the expressed concerns of citizens living in democratic states and the practical problems associated with applying normative principles in ways which actually help address the issue at hand. This piece discusses some of these themes, and the issue of migration more generally, in order to help frame the debate which follows.     

Democratic justice: the priority of politics and the ideal of citizenship

In his Democratic justice and the social contract, Weale presents a distinctive contingent practice-dependent model of ‘democratic justice’ that relies heavily on a condition of just social and political relations among equals. Several issues arise from this account. Under which conditions might such just social and political relations be realised? What ideal of equality is required for ‘democratic justice’? What are its implications for the political ideal of citizenship? This paper focuses on these questions as a way to critically reconsider Weale’s model. After presenting Weale’s procedural constructivism, I distinguish his model from an institutional practice-dependent model, one salient example of which is Rawls’s political constructivism. This distinction allows for a formulation of the social and political equality required for justice in each case. The contingent model assumes that an equality of ‘status’ will generate just social practices, yet it fails to recognise that an equality of ‘role’ is also important to ensure citizens’ compliance. The paper ultimately seeks to show that the contingent model is insufficient to ensure that just social practices will become stable.     

关于人权的探究——评《人的权利与人的多样性——人权哲学》

米尔恩把本书称作一部人权哲学著作,在中文版序中他提到作为理解世界和人类状况的一种尝试,哲学探究不限于任何一种文化和文明的传统.从根本上讲,它是一种人类的探究,任何人都是可以投身于其中的.这里唯一的要求就是苏格拉底的那种"刨根问底"的执着.重新审视米尔恩提出的低限人权,并试图开放出米尔恩的努力所伴随的问题.