江泽民同志反腐败大思路论略

以江泽民为核心的党的第三代领导集体,深刻认识到新形势下反腐败斗争的重要性,加大了反腐败斗争的力度,形成了比较完整的反腐败大思路。     

党的十六大以来党建思想的创新点

党的十六大以来党建思想的创新点包括:提出立党为公、执政为民的执政理念,提出党的执政理论的完整体系,提出从广度和深度上加强党的执政能力建设,提出建立教育、制度、监督并重的惩治和预防腐败体系,提出并论证了党的先进性建设,提出党内和谐的概念,提出领导干部应坚持的七个方面的良好作风。     

Compromising coalitions and duplicitous diplomacy: US support for Tajikistan after 9/11 and its security implications

This article investigates the development of democracy in Tajikistan and analyzes what has earned it the most international acclaim: its secular-Islamic governing coalition. The investigation reveals a compromised and illegitimate coalition that, with American collusion in local regime repression, poses great dangers to international security. The article argues that government repression, leading to increasing radicalization, combines with foreign aid to damage long-term democracy potential in Tajikistan but also works against global security interests by creating doubt about American intentions and possibly allowing a concomitant rise in Islamic radicalism.     

腐败与反腐败：基于制度框架的视角

通过对腐败现象的产生和反腐败工作进行制度层面的分析,可以看出,产生腐败的根源在于制度安排存在着缺陷,只有积极推动制度创新,构筑反腐败的制度平台,才能有效地遏制腐败。     

浅谈反腐败措施

腐败是一个非常严重的社会问题,它是社会不稳定的因素.腐败产生有历史的原因,也有经济、政治、体制等方面的原因.腐败主要是权力的腐败.权力本身具有膨胀的特性,加上主体的私欲,便使腐败由可能变成现实.要想真正遏制腐败现象,必须从经济、政治、体制、法律、思想道德等多方面全面入手,其中,建立"以权力制约权力"及相关法律制度是最有效和最持久的途径.     

建立权力制衡机制从源头上治理腐败

我国行政管理权力过于集中的现状为腐败分子滥用权力提供了广泛的空间,因而致使腐败现象始终呈发展趋势."要防止滥用权力,就必须以权力约束权力."当前,只有建立、健全对权力的监督、制约机制,才能真正有效地遏制腐败.对权力获得的制衡,这是保证权力正常运行的前提;而对权力运行过程的制衡,则是权力制衡的关键.     

权力制衡与反腐败

产生腐败的一个重要原因是权力过分集中,为了防止腐败,必须进行权力制衡。用权力约束权力,建立良好选人用人机制,把好选人用人关口;压缩减少权力,对权力进行横向、纵向的分割,科学分解,合理制衡;对权力的运用过程进行透明公开,建立阳光行政的权力框架;建立完善的监督机制,对权力进行全方位的监督。     

The micro–macro interactive approach to political trust: Quality of representation and substantive representation across Europe

The relevance of the macro-context for understanding political trust has been widely studied in recent decades, with increasing attention paid to micro–macro level interactive relationships. Most of these studies rely on theorising about evaluation based on the quality of representation, stressing that more-educated citizens are most trusting of politics in countries with the least corrupt public domains. In our internationally comparative study, we add to the micro–macro interactive approach by theorising and testing an additional way in which the national context is associated with individual-level political trust, namely evaluation based on substantive representation. The relevance of both types of evaluation is tested by modelling not only macro-level corruption but also context indicators of the ideological stances of the governing cabinet (i.e., the level of its economic egalitarianism and cultural liberalism), and interacting these with individual-level education, economic egalitarianism and cultural liberalism, respectively. As we measure context characteristics separately from people's ideological preferences, we are able to dissect how the macro-context relates to the levels of political trust of different subgroups differently. Data from three waves (2006, 2010, 2014) of the European Social Survey (68,294 respondents in 24 European countries and 62 country-year combinations), enriched with country-level data derived from various sources, including the Chapel Hill Expert Survey, are used in the multi-level regression analyses employed to test our hypotheses. We found support for the micro–macro level interactions theorised by the evaluation based on the quality of representation approach (with higher levels of trust among more-educated citizens in less corrupt countries), as well as for evaluation based on substantive representation in relation to cultural issues (with higher levels of trust among more culturally liberal citizens in countries with more culturally liberal governing cabinets). Our findings indicate that the latter approach is at least equally relevant as the approach conventionally used to explain context differences in political trust. Finally, we conclude our study with a discussion of our findings and avenues for future research.     

性贿赂与性受贿腐败犯罪行为刑事立法问题评析

性贿赂与性受贿腐败问题乃当前贪污贿赂等腐败犯罪中普遍存在的现象。对性贿赂等腐败犯罪现象是否用刑法加以制裁以及如何制裁是当前刑事司法界颇具争议的问题。性行贿与性受贿往往引发极其严重的腐败犯罪,致使国家蒙受极大的经济损失。遏制腐败犯罪现象的蔓延,必须有效打击性贿赂犯罪。我国应尽早研究刑事立法对策。     

论程序法在反腐败中的作用

程序,在法学意义上通常表现为由法律规定的、人们从事某种行为所必须采用的程式、步骤、顺序、时限和手续；就本质而言,它实际上是一种由一定的程序性权力和权利共同组成并相互作用的、相对独立和固定的关系系统.法律程序所具有的关系性、人为性和强制性,使其既可以保证国家权力的顺利实现,又可以在约束权力恣意、防止权力腐败方面发挥重要作...