论坚守耕地红线的内涵

18亿亩耕地红线是农民生活和农业现代化的基础,是国家粮食安全和生态安全的重要保障。正确理解耕地红线,不仅要重视数量目标,更要重视质量目标,必须关注耕地综合生产能力稳定提高和耕地健康问题。不仅如此,正确理解和坚守耕地红线,还要按照建设现代农业、建设社会主义新农村的要求,重视耕地基本形态的重构,重视提高耕地利用效率;要按照建设生态文明的崇高目标,重视耕地生态景观价值和文化价值的建设和保护;要以建设促保护,让土地整理发挥更大的作用。     

在优化学校环境中渗透心理健康教育

学校环境是影响青少年学生身心健康的重要因素。学校环境包括学校物质环境和心理环境,它们都直接或间接地影响着学生的心理健康。因此,优化学校的物质与心理环境,可以为学生的心理健康发展提供平台,从而真正实现学校心理健康教育的目的。     

社会环境对少数民族大学生思想政治教育的影响

社会环境是思想政治教育活动的重要构成要素,文章从社会环境的不同角度分别分析其对少数民族大学生这个特殊群体思想政治教育产生的正负影响,以优化社会环境,提高少数民族大学生思想政治教育的实效性。     

缺失与斧正——从行政生态到生态行政

资源环境问题的恶化反映了行政生态理论的重大缺失——不能有效指导公共行政以应对资源环境危机。生态行政是对行政生态的修正,推行生态行政需要从斧正行政目标、强化政府环保责任、平衡政府权能、完善绩效评估指标体系、约束政府生态管理行为等方面加以实现。     

从心理健康的角度谈快乐童年的塑造

每个人都从童年开始他的精彩人生,每个人的童年经历将会是精彩人生中心理健康的基点.家庭教育、学校教育和社会教育都应该承担让儿童快乐成长的责任,让儿童体验快乐,创造快乐,使儿童在快乐中成长为拥有良好心理素质的个体,以健康的心理去生活和工作.     

生态城市建设中生态安全保障的法律机制探析——以大连生态城市建设为例

城市是一种高度人工化的自然—经济—社会复合生态系统,其自然资源和生态环境受人类活动的影响很大,如何实现生态系统良性循环,实现人与自然的共生和谐,生态城市作为城市发展的全新模式进入人们视野。从大连建设生态城市中面临的环境与生态危机分析入手,探讨如何建立相应的法律机制保障生态安全,推动生态城市的建设。     

论资源节约型环境友好型社会的构建

资源节约型、环境友好型社会既是资源和环境全球化的必然要求,也是国内资源环境矛盾所使然。“两型社会”的首要任务是建设资源节约型社会,应以资源节约型社会建设为基础,全面推进环境友好型社会建设。“两型社会”的构建是一项复杂的系统工程,它需要坚持并发展马克思主义的生态观,整合环境文化,完善民主法治,推动环境公正,创新绿色科技,发展环境经济,实现资源环境公平,推进建立国际政治经济新秩序,从而在思想、政治、经济、技术、文化、社会和国际等各个方面夯实基础。     

海洋生态环境保护的前沿问题

针对人工岛建设存在的海岛及周边水域环境日益恶化、海岛的传统捕捞业已失去发展空间、海岛生态系统功能丧失等问题,我国应以科学发展观为指导．对海洋权益、海洋环境、区域布局、公共设施建设等进行综合研究,完善配套法律法规。建立和谐海洋生态秩序,尊重自然规律,考虑海岛环境对人口的承栽能力。妥善解决人工岛建设与保护海洋生态环境的矛盾关系。     

China’s Development of ETS as a GHG Mitigating Policy Tool: A Case of Policy Diffusion or Domestic Drivers?

China launched its national emissions trading scheme (ETS) in late 2017. This article examines the key drivers behind China’s 2011 decision to opt for ETS as a GHG mitigating policy tool and what lay behind the choice of the system’s design features. Given the existence of the frontrunner EU ETS and that market mechanisms have spread across the world in recent years, we analyze the role played by policy diffusion in the decision to launch an ETS and in the subsequent design process, seen in relation to domestic drivers. The article investigates policy developments culminating in the 2011 carbon market announcement, and the reasons these design elements were chosen for the pilot schemes and the national market in the period 2011–2017. The article contributes to our understanding of policy diffusion at different stages of policy development in China, by revealing which diffusion mechanism is more prevalent at different stages. We find first that overall domestic conditions and drivers had the most consistent impact on policy decisions to establish a carbon market and on the selected sectors. However, a second key finding is that the role of policy diffusion varied over time, with such diffusion, in the form of ideational impact, playing the most important role early on, providing a powerful inducement for China to go for a carbon market. Third, sophisticated learning from international projects took place in the pilots, allowing China to adapt policies and design features to match local conditions.     

How to Achieve a More Resource‐Efficient and Climate‐Neutral Energy System by 2030? Views of Nordic Stakeholders

The Nordic countries pursue ambitious energy transition goals through national energy policies and in the framework of Nordic cooperation. We propose that the transition is realistic only if it involves the public, private, and nongovernmental organization sectors as regulators, innovators, and advocates of relevant policies and solutions representing the multitude of interests involved. We examine these interests through Q methodological experiments, where 43 expert stakeholders’ rank‐order statements concerning their preferred policy measures vis‐à‐vis the electric energy system. Factor analysis of these subjectively held views produces three distinct views. The first two enjoy strong inter‐Nordic support. The first view prioritizes market and grid development, and the second view prioritizes electric transport, and solar and wind power. The third, “Finnish” view seeks to enhance security of supply, also via microgrids, and prioritizes biofuels over electric transport. Examining the common ground among the three views, we find that enhanced cooperation requires reinforced stakeholder interaction and policy coordination.