国有小型企业法人财产权法律性质探讨

本文认为由国家直接投资的大中型国有企业法人财产权的法律性质应是国家拥有所有权并授权企业进行经营管理,企业拥有经营权;而大多数国有企业的法人财产权法律性质则应为企业法人财产权。     

侵犯商业秘密行为的法律救济

本文结合有关商业秘密的立法和司法实践 ,对侵犯商业秘密行为的认定、举证责任的分担、保全措施及法律救济措施的适用等问题进行了深入探讨     

纠纷成本与诉讼效益分析

本文试图用经济学的基本理论和方法对纠纷的成本与诉讼效益做一分析。纠纷妨碍了交易和效益 ,增加了成本。在诉讼中和通过诉讼 ,做到尽量避免纠纷对收益的不利影响 ,努力减少纠纷成本 ,并影响和减少纠纷的数量 ,这就是诉讼之效益。     

Where is public affairs going?

This paper suggests the future direction in which public affairs practice is developing and advances a number of propositions about public affairs and political systems which provide the context in which public affairs practitioners operate. The paper examines the changing nature of the political systems in which public affairs functions and argues that, by inference, public affairs practice is culturally specific. The paper explores these contextual issues from both a European and a global perspective. The paper argues that an understanding of public affairs should be recognised as an essential element on management teaching syllabi and laments the fact that this is far from the case. Copyright © 2001 Henry Stewart Publications     

比较法视野下证人资格审查的程序构建

证人的事实能力与法律能力是证人能力在不同语境下的不同表现形式,两者之间的错位也决定了证人资格实体规则与程序规则并存的必要性。证人在大陆法系中被视为“法官的助手”,具有相对的中立性,法官对证人资格的审查奉行职权主义;证人在英美法系中被视为“当事人的助手”,具有一定的党派性,法官对证人资格的审查奉行当事人主义。我国证人资格制度存在严重的程序缺失,导致公权力运行的失范和私权利缺乏有效救济,应在刑事诉讼程序中设置证人资格的预先审查程序与开庭审查程序。     

歧视与平等机会的法律透视

平等机会就是人们参与社会政治、经济等活动,根据一定的标准和原则,平等地拥有争取或获得某种资源的可能性.这种机会的获得不因某种身份状况而得到不公平的待遇.歧视就是基于某类人所具有的某种身份状况,以不合理的或不相干的理由,给他人以较差的待遇,从而使其利益受损的行为.歧视的后果就是使他人丧失争取或获得资源的平等机会.反歧视是实现平等机会的重要措施.     

自然资源物权法律关系理论探析

论及自然资源物权,从法律关系的角度入手进行研究可以更加清晰的认识自然资源物权的特点。自然资源所有权的主体只能是国家和集体,国家行使自然资源所有权的主要方式是出让自然资源利用权,集体行使自然资源所有权的主要方式是发包自然资源利用权,集体行使自然资源所有权应以集体成员利益为本。应赋予自然资源用益物权更加独立的地位,需要处理好自然资源用益物权人与所有权人之间的权利义务关系。自然资源担保物权的客体是可以转让的自然资源用益物权,自然资源担保物权的主要形式是权利抵押。     

我国农村土地承包经营权流转研究

农村土地承包经营权流转是当前我国土地制度改革和创新的成果,也是化解"三农"问题的关键环节。以我国农村土地承包经营权法律性质流变为考察路径,对我国当前农村土地承包经营流转的特点、存在的问题及成因进行详尽分析,有助于在制度层面上对其流转的范式加以完善。     

Who gains from apparentments under D’Hondt?

Apparentments – or coalitions of several electoral lists – are a widely neglected aspect of the study of proportional electoral systems. This paper proposes a formal model that explains the benefits political parties derive from apparentments, based on their alliance strategies and relative size. In doing so, it reveals that apparentments are most beneficial for highly fractionalised political blocs. However, it also emerges that large parties stand to gain much more from apparentments than small parties do. Because of this, small parties are likely to join in apparentments with other small parties, excluding large parties where possible. These arguments are tested empirically, using a new dataset from the Swiss national parliamentary elections covering a period from 1995 to 2007.     

Linking coalition attitudes and split-ticket voting: The Scottish Parliament elections of 2007

The Scottish Parliament elections of 2007 were the third to be held under the country’s mixed-member proportional system. As voters continue to adapt to the new system, we explore two aspects of its use: i) preferences for coalitions as opposed to single-party government, and ii) ticket-splitting. The two are considered together for two reasons. First, both can be seen as manifestations of a preference for multiple parties, and as a result they share a number of likely predictors in common. In empirical practice, however, we find that rather different factors predict the two variables: ticket-splitting looks to be based on strategic partisan or ideological calculation, whereas coalition attitudes are less about partisan interests and more about an overall view of the kind of policies and politics delivered by coalitions. Second, there is potential for a causal connection between our two dependent variables, and indeed we do find clear evidence of such an attitude–behaviour link: some voters appear to split their ticket precisely because they would prefer a coalition.