Public Discourse of (De)legitimation: The Case of South Estonian Language

This paper focuses on two different argumentative strategies for dealing with a regional variety of Estonian, one of which may discourage the use of South Estonian in favor of Estonian, while another legitimates the lesser-used regional variety. These argumentative strategies are studied by critical discourse analysis (CDA) of six articles in Estonian language newspapers and magazines published in 2004–2005. The use of South Estonian is discouraged by presenting real or imagined threats that it will undermine Estonian. This discourse also parallels the Estonian-Russian majority-minority discourse of recent years by employing zero-sum arguments of the Estonian language losing to Russian as a consequence of the recognition of South Estonian. Language ideologies, which also construct some varieties worthier than others, re-enforce an essentialist representation of separate languages. This representation will work toward suppressing linguistic variation.     

人工智能时代生物识别信息刑法保护的国际视野与中国立场——从“人脸识别技术”应用下滥用信息问题切入

人脸识别技术作为人工智能学科中发展最为迅捷的一个分支,被广泛地被运用于社会生活的各个领域,生物识别信息因其所具备的专属性和唯一性的特征在大量身份核验的场景被采集,在审慎借鉴欧美先进立法经验和对我国实践困境的反思基础上,我国应当构建完善生物识别信息刑法保护制度,优化生物识别技术的刑事规制界限,完善生物识别信息层次特殊保护体系,将滥用生物识别信息行为入罪,实现生物识别信息合理开发利用与公民个人有序生活不受侵扰的基本价值诉求之平衡。     

The legal framework of private universities in Spain

The setting up of Universities in Spain is considered to be part of the fundamental right to establish private educational institutions. For a long time there have only existed Church Universities alongside Public Universities, and these have had their legal basis in Agreements between Spain and the Vatican. As of 1991 there has been an on-going process of setting up purely private Universities, to the point that there are now eleven besides the Church Universities. This article examines their legal framework from the point of view of their organisation, the system governing their teaching staff and their effective autonomy with regard to the Public Authorities. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

权利的伦理解析

权利起源于人际之利害关系,它界定行动的自由度,以利己为原动力,并且只有在社会认同的基础上才具有正当性。     

特窄频率录音的话者鉴别研究

本文对18对双胞胎正常朗读语音2000Hz以下这一特窄频率范围的共振峰频率特性进行了定量测量、比较、分析，统计得出了该频率范围内利用共振峰频率特性进行说话人识别的可行性及百分比判域。     

两岸民事判决的认可与执行问题研究

目前两岸互相认可与执行民事判决的规定仍有诸多分歧与差异，表现在对民事确定裁判的概念与内容、国际管辖权、保障法定听审以及两岸法院认可判决的程序和效力等问题之上。本文认为，人民法院的确定判决应有既判力，人民法院作成的调解书应属“民事确定裁判”的指涉范围。解决这些问题的最佳方式，系两岸就民事判决的相互认可与执行签署共同协议。     

从社会认同的视角看“愤青”的批判取向

“愤青”指网络舆论中对外表现为网络民族主义，对内表现为网络批判现实主义的青年群体。从社会认同理论角度看，“愤青”所具有的对外网络民族主义、对内网络现实批判主义的倾向，是社会认同作用的结果和表现形式。     

外交承认的旧模式和新趋势

承认是外交、国际关系、国际法领域里一个古老的概念。在国际关系领域,承认一直被视作国家交往的前提条件,是否给予承认也因此成了一种政治资源。随着非国家行为体越来越多地参与国际社会进程,外交承认的原则已经在包容性和排他性两个极端之间发生重大的变化,欧盟的对外行为最能反映外交承认的新特征。但欧洲的创新没有取代传统外交,而只是增加了新层面。从长远来看,NGO和其他行为体参与国际社会对外交承认标准提出了挑战。     

海牙《协议选择法院公约》对中国国际私法立法的启示

海牙《协议选择法院公约》作为国际范围内统一民事管辖权和外国判决的承认与执行的重要成果,建立了“排他性法院选择协议”的管辖权模式,采用了新的“国际性案件”划分标准,鼓励选择诉讼作为解决争议的方式,针对被请求国承认和执行惩罚性赔偿判决问题达成了妥协,为中国国际私法立法,特别是《民事诉讼法》的修订具有重大启示。     

论生产销售伪劣商品罪的概念及其认定

目前 ,人们在认定生产、销售伪劣商品罪的过程中存在错误认识。司法实践中 ,要准确认定生产、销售伪劣商品罪 ,应正确理解它的概念 ,并在弄清其犯罪构成的基础上 ,重点解决主观罪过形式和罪与非罪的标准问题