行刑制度的历史溯源和发展趋势

从刑罚的产生至今,行刑制度经历了一个漫长的发展与演变过程,诠释了三个显著的特征:从行刑的无定制到行刑的规范化、从行刑的封闭化到行刑的社会化、从行刑的简单化到行刑的科学化,从中也体现出惩罚、剥夺、矫正、预防这一发展中的行刑理念。     

也谈犯罪心理痕迹

犯罪心理痕迹主要是指犯罪分子在实施犯罪过程中和犯罪前后的心理活动。这种心理活动在一定的情境中和条件下 ,会客观反映犯罪分子心理活动的历程及个性特征。在侦查工作中 ,研究和应用犯罪心理痕迹 ,对分析犯罪分子的犯罪动机、实施犯罪活动的过程以及“刻画”犯罪分子均大有裨益。     

家园的远古召唤与现代追寻——解读《耶路撒冷之鸽》

以色列作家梅厄·沙莱夫的《耶路撒冷之鸽》,用文学揭示了一个具有千年流浪史的民族对家园的深切召唤与追寻。整部作品从头至尾回荡着一个声音,那就是回家。而随着传统的家园文化的不断现代变迁,家的重新拥有能否给本民族带来真正的快乐?这将成为一个值得思考的问题。     

论环境利益“双轨”保护制度

环境利益属于公共利益。传统法律理论认为,公共利益的保护是政府的职权和责任,只有政府是公共利益的代言人。本文认为,除了政府可作为公共利益的代表外,也应当允许社会公众作为公共利益的代表,直接参与公共利益的维护,即建立环境公益的政府和公众的双轨保护制度。为此,特别应在环境保护立法中建立和完善公众参与制度,赋予公众独立的环境保护主体资格和相应的权利义务。     

U.S.–Iran Nuclear Track Two from 2005 to 2011: What Have We Learned? Where Are We Going?

This article reviews and assesses United States–Iran track two diplomacy over the nuclear issue from 2005 to 2011. It asks why during what should have been a “ripe” moment for discussions, in the first years of the Obama Administration, track two processes were able to contribute so little to any official progress on the issue. The article concludes that the moment was not so ripe, after all, and that officials on each side were less willing to receive the ideas generated by track two than their rhetoric would have indicated.     

铁路行车影响下形成头部道碴创的特点与鉴别

目的总结铁路行车影响下形成的头部道碴创之形态特点,探索其与一般头部钝器打击创的鉴别方法。方法对1994～2008年间怀化、长沙铁路公安处管辖内发生的因铁路行车的影响形成了头部道碴创的损伤案例从创的分布特点、创角的锐利程度、创缘的挫伤、创壁的光滑程度、创的深度、颅骨的损伤特点等方面进行分析,并与常见棍棒、锤类、石头等钝器打击头部形成的创相比较。结果与打击时受害者处于相对静止状态不同,铁路行车影响下人体头部所形成的道碴创是在头部处于运动中形成;两者由于致伤机理不同,导致头部创呈现不同的特征。结论铁路行车影响下形成的头部道碴创具有独特的特征,可与头部钝器打击创鉴别。     

改革30年来国有企业工人权利意识的发展轨迹及其特征

中国改革开放30年来，随着国企制度改革的不断深入发展，国有企业工人权利意识开始显现、发展。工人权利意识的发展、演进，是中国社会进步的体现。     

轨迹侦查方法的应然研究

随着大数据的不断发展,轨迹数据分析也被应用于社会各行各业之中,而高科技化、专业化、智能化犯罪等犯罪行为的频繁发生,致使刑事案件日益突显出其动态性、智能性、隐蔽性等新的特点。侦查机关为实现“主动预防、精确打击”的侦查效果,开始引入轨迹侦查方法。轨迹侦查既能创新侦查模式和提升侦查效能,又能变革侦查思维和推进情报侦查的新路径。     

陕西毒品违法犯罪的发展轨迹与现状

陕西是全国毒品违法犯罪的重灾区 ,在研究陕西毒品违法犯罪发展轨迹的基础上 ,通过对陕西省毒源与涉毒地区、毒品、吸毒人员、贩毒人员、地方禁毒执法等五个方面的研究 ,分析了陕西省毒品违法犯罪”市场”的现状。     

Influencing Negotiation Willingness in the Middle East: The Potential Contributions of Private Actors

Numerous efforts to solve the Israeli–Palestinian conflict through diplomacy have taken place over the last four decades. To shed light on this dilemma in this article, the role that private actors and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) can play to enhance the negotiation willingness of nonstate armed groups was examined. It was argued that the NGOs in particular could play key roles in promoting the negotiation willingness of nonstate actors and also in influencing their internal dynamics and increasing their cohesion. Specifically, we examine two pairs of efforts to resolve the conflict in Israel and Palestine: the “Road Map” and the track two Geneva Initiative of 2003, and the Olmert Peace Plan and Jimmy Carter's visit to the Middle East in 2008. In the first pair, NGO efforts yielded unexpected results. The Palestinians were ready to compromise even though the deal offered by the Israelis did not seem very generous. In the second pair, the reaction of the Palestinians to Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert's generous peace offer seemed especially puzzling, illustrating, the internal dynamics between the Palestinian factions. Negotiation willingness was closely related to cohesion, and that cohesion plays an important role in conflict negotiations. President Jimmy Carter's efforts in 2008 to enhance cohesion among the Palestinians illustrated the potential that NGOs have to complement official negotiations.