环渤海区域生态环境及其政策法制协调机制建设

环渤海地区经济的发展带来了一系列生态环境问题,要从根本上解决这些生态环境问题,必须加强政策与法制协调机制建设,建立协调区域关系,完善环渤海区域生态补偿机制。     

Organized transnational crime in the Black Sea Region: a geopolitical dilemma?

States are unique and individual entities. However, geographic proximity, a common history and fate may cause existential threats to have common causes and solutions. To understand how, and why, states experience transnational organized crime as a national security threat differently, it is necessary to learn about the states and the culture of organized crime in the geographic region in which they are embedded. The objective here is to present the Post-Soviet Political Criminal Nexus as a part of the identity of Newly Independent States in the Black Sea Region (Azerbaijan, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine) which poses an international security threat and impedes democratic development.

构建南海非传统安全多边合作整体架构研究

近年来,南海非传统安全多边合作机制呈现“碎片化”特征,数量众多、不成体系、互不连属,造成了机制拥堵和功能重叠。南海多边合作机制“碎片化”和未形成多边合作整体架构的重要原因在于,中国、东盟声索国和域外大国这三类行为体各自牵头的机制多元共存,并对“谁的多边安全”“什么样的多边安全”“如何建立多边安全”这三个问题作出了各自的回答。构建南海非传统安全多边合作的整体架构,可将正在谈判中的“南海行为准则”作为“机制融合”的核心;同时,将《联合国海洋法公约》中的一些原则、“南海沿岸国合作机制”倡议融合到“南海行为准则”制定中;需要从高度紧迫且三类行为体尤其是中美都愿意合作的非传统安全威胁领域着手,并从已有的南海及其毗连海域非传统安全多边合作案例中获取经验。构建南海非传统安全多边合作的整体架构,相关国家应坚持四条基本原则：南海沿岸国寻求与域外大国的良性互动;打击跨国海盗和恐怖主义须作为优先选项;将提升海上能力建设作为重点;推进海洋环保和渔业资源管理的多边合作。     

南海地缘政治特征及中国南海地缘战略

本文结合当前南海形势和中国国情,对南海地缘政治特点、南海地缘战略价值和我国南海地缘战略等方面作分析研究。     

马来西亚南海安全政策初探

南海分布着马来西亚的领海和专属经济区海域,是马来西亚国家利益的重要组成部分。为实践在南海地区“维护海洋环境的稳定,不受限制地开发海洋资源和开展国际贸易”的战略构想,马来西亚通过建立和发展自主的国防力量,与区域内外国家开展有限的安全合作以增强在南海的防御能力,并通过各种途径巩固对南沙部分岛礁的占领,实现其在南海的主权安全和经济安全。马来西亚将南海视为其海洋利益拓展的前沿阵地,在南海问题趋于复杂化、国际化的背景下,马来西亚希望通过实施大国平衡战略,维持南海地区的力量平衡,创造对己有利的海上安全环境。     

“转变官风”的分析与建议

党风官风,关乎国家的前途和民族的兴衰,是一等一的大事.需从经济学的角度,对当前群众反应强烈的"文山会海"、"官书官学"、"公款消费"等问题加以探讨,以此引起社会各界的关注与讨论.     

论国际法上共同开发的概念及特征

共同开发是国际法承认的概念 ,但学术界却对此有不同的定义。作者认为应从法律和功能性两种角度对共同开发进行狭义定义 ,即它是指主权国家基于协议 ,就跨越彼此间边界线或位于争议区的共同矿藏 ,以某种合作形式进行勘探或开发的活动。共同开发具有任择性、国家主体性、客体共享性、功能性和临时性 5大法律特征     

Sino-Japanese Dispute over the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands: The Pending Controversy from the Chinese Perspective

The Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands have brought China and Japan into a bitter dispute for many decades. With regard to the real question of who owns sovereignty over the islands, the two claimants can not come to terms on several critical issues, such as whether the islands were terra nullius when Japan claimed sovereignty in 1895, whether Japan returned the islands to China after the Japanese defeat in WWII, and how their maritime boundary in the East China Sea should be demarcated according to international law. There is no ready solution to the longstanding stalemate, but the pending dispute could be shelved and managed from escalating into a military conflict. Dr. Zhongqi PAN is an Associate Professor at the School of International Relations and Public Affairs in Fudan University. He received his Ph.D. in international relations from Fudan University in 1999. He was a visiting scholar to Lund University (2006), the John K. Fairbank Center for East Asian Research at Harvard University (2004), the Henry L. Stimson Center (2001), and University of Tokyo (1999–2000).     

天津滨海新区的发展与环渤海地区的历史性机遇

天津滨海新区的开发开放列入《中共中央关于制定国民经济和社会发展第十一个五年规划的建议》,不但为滨海新区和天津市的发展带来了重大的历史性机遇,而且也将对整个环渤海地区的发展产生深远的影响。做大做强滨海新区,克服区域经济合作中的体制性障碍,延长新区产业链,将使天津滨海新区成为环渤海地区的一个重要的“增长极”,并有力地推动区域经济合作的发展。     

Security relations in the Black Sea region: Russia and the West after the Ukrainian crisis

The Ukrainian conflict – as all post-Soviet conflicts – has three interrelated dimensions – global, regional and local – with deep implications for international security including the Black Sea region. The strategic interdependence between Russiaand West during the last decade became not only anaemic but antagonistic. The regional implications of that can be compared to the boomerang effect: problems at the strategic level affect the regional level and return to the originators. Generally speaking, Commonwealth of Independent States conflicts can be viewed as the product of the Soviet legacy and the patchy collapse of the USSR as well as the ill-conceived policies and mistakes of the involved parties, Russia and external actors – USA, NATO and EU.