1999中国公安社科理论期刊文献统计与评价

以 1999年中国正式公开出版的公安高校学报为样本 ,统计分析当前中国公安社科理论期刊论文作者的合著率、系统分布 ,以及文献的学科类属、主题、规范化等问题 ,从中评价中国公安社科文献价值、公安社科理论研究的水平 ,提出公安理论期刊社应努力的发展方向     

系统论视阈下教育现代化发展政策调适体系构建

党的十九届五中全会描绘出2035年基本实现社会主义现代化的远景目标。教育现代化是实现社会主义现代化的奠基工程,党和国家在加快推进教育现代化过程中,各项战略部署充分彰显了整体性、层次性、开放性、动态性等系统性治理思维,为总体实现教育现代化目标奠定了重要的方法论基础,生动阐释了中国特色社会主义教育的制度优势。坚持系统观念完善教育现代化体系,亟须构建“动态监测——政策调适——科学督导——质量提升”的循环闭合型运行系统,整体提升政策的运行、监测、调适和执行的力度,加快推进高质量教育体系建设。     

未成年人审前羁押决定的客观化建构——以社会危险性量化评估结果为判断基础

受制于实用主义导向,我国审前羁押程序设计中侦查权一家独大,逮捕等羁押手段出现了功能性的异化倾向。在这一背景下,虽然通过相关立法改革,以及未成年人检察部门的成立,为在检察阶段建立未成年犯罪人的分流转处程序创造了条件,但建构未成年人羁押必要性审查模式或者"检察中心主义",彻底贯彻"未成年人特殊论"这一基本原则,仍有待于羁押必要性评估机制与相关配套措施的完善。就未成年人的审前羁押必要性评估机制而言,应围绕"未成年人社会危险性"这一关键要素的量化分析模式展开,在摸索评估客观化、程序化建构的同时,为解决社会危险性认定标准存在的"可操作性问题"积累经验。     

Moving from Evidence‐Light to Evidence‐Based Practice: Randomized Control Trials in Family Law

In a resource‐constrained environment, such as the access to justice field, it is critical to develop better knowledge about effective and efficient service delivery. This article discusses the need for more rigorous evaluation and research in the field, both in order to better reach individuals with legal needs and to maximize court resources. Various evaluation methodologies will be explained, along with examples of current randomized control trial studies being conducted at the Harvard Access to Justice Lab.     

A new way of measuring behavioural compliance for prevention programme interventions using KAP Score

KAP Score is an evaluation tool developed to enable aid and donor organisations to monitor and evaluate the outcome of interventions, particularly those where the link between programme activities and outcomes constitutes an “unknown”. This article articulates KAP Score and demonstrates how it has been applied to two separate interventions related to risk avoidance (human trafficking) and demand reduction (wildlife consumption) to generate quantitative evidence for assessing how they contributed to increasing compliance. The examples presented demonstrate how KAP Score attributed the effectiveness of these interventions to a proxy indicator that can measure incremental behavioural compliance.     

司法鉴定意见争议评价机制研究——以浙江省司法鉴定管理模式为视角

司法鉴定争议是指对司法鉴定意见存在争议引起的纠纷。本文侧重从司法鉴定意见的科学性、客观性、相关性、合法性四个评价维度切入,提出重新司法鉴定、司法鉴定人出庭作证、司法鉴定专家评价三种评价方式。结合浙江省司法鉴定管理实践,介绍了通过建立司法鉴定投诉处理工作、司法鉴定机构受理司法鉴定委托、重大鉴定事项报告、司法鉴定专家咨询、推进司法鉴定人出庭作证的四项机制,来解决或减少当事人对司法鉴定意见的异议。     

And the question is? Knowledge growth in welfare policy research

This study examines how federally sponsored research questions about welfare policy have evolved from 1981 to 2001, through a content analysis of Requests for Proposals (RFPs). We treat the RFP as a document that identifies what information is sought as well as what is treated as established knowledge. Results show that research questions represent a mixture of constancy and change. The greatest similarity in research questions is in the areas of employment and earnings/income, with greater variability in the areas of family formation and child outcomes. The research questions, notwithstanding their sophisticated terminology, often boil down to who the poor are, how welfare recipients can be coaxed or forced into the labor market, whether fundamental work supports such as health insurance and reliable childcare are helpful in sustaining employment, and whether welfare is implicated in pregnancy, marital behavior and multi-generational poverty. We interpret these findings in relation to concepts on research utilization.

Building indicators to address community sustainability: learning from the Mixteca region,Mexico

This article reports on an indicator model to assess sustainability at the community level that was developed by an interdisciplinary work group. We applied this model in a case study of the Mixteca region in Oaxaca, Mexico, and provided a tool guide to measure the effectiveness of community-based actions. Two innovative aspects are presented: an iterative process with the community to develop a locally appropriate set of indicators drawn from the literature, and a baseline diagnostic assessment of the community’s performance on these indicators. This assessment may serve as a basis for future research and community-driven projects.     

我国行政司法运行情况的实证评估

行政司法程序对于审查行政执法行为合法性、保障行政行对人的合法权益具有重要意义。我国的行政诉讼实践能够在多大程度上实现行政司法程序的制度价值,可以通过实证评估的方法进行测量。中国司法文明指数报告项目的调研数据,反映了我国行政诉讼在及时受理起诉、符合程序公正、有效执行裁判、提供有效诉讼救济等方面的情况。通过对调研数据进行挖掘可以发现,行政司法程序的运行情况与法官形象之间存在正关联,对于这种关联可以进行多种解释。对于行政司法程序的评估,不同职业群体之间存在差异,这可以解释为视角偏差、社会信息供给负面化等原因。     

Participatory gender-responsive monitoring of women land rights: empowering and smart

This viewpoint argues that a genuine participatory approach to defining a theory of change and outcome indicators of enhanced women land and property rights is essential to include the standpoint of women and men who are directly involved, and to acknowledge their power to frame the change and solutions they envision. Moreover, outcomes and outcome indicators defined by women and men who are targeted by women rights interventions typically better distinguish outcomes to be reached among women, among men, and in terms of gender relations, are more concrete and easier to measure.