对新技术时代的知识产权行政管理机构的探讨

20世纪90年代以来的技术革新给知识产权行政管理机构带来了深刻的影响。知识产权行政管理机构的性质从法人机构逐渐转变为执行或特殊机构;从较多关注于知识产权登记、审核的机构向承担更多的政治、经济发展职责的机构转变。技术进步也带来了知识产权行政管理机构传播以及保护作用的巨大变化。我国的知识产权行政管理机构必须认识到技术进步带给知识产权行政管理的挑战并作出相应的变革。     

论我国知识产权法院的规划设计

知识产权审判面临事实查明难度大,民事、刑事和行政审判领域之间缺乏沟通,确权纠纷解决程序设计不合理等现实问题。世界范围的知识产权审判体制改革业已形成较为一致的趋势和做法,我国知识产权法院的规划设计应当合理借鉴比较法经验,秉持战略思维、国情思维、改革思维和治理思维,按照四级两审、交错并行的纵向架构,均衡分布、两区分离的横向布局,在案件管辖上实行民事、刑事和行政纠纷的三审合一与技术类纠纷的集中管辖,通过准确的程序定位与有效的程序衔接提高确权争议解决的效率,以多元设计的程序规则和增设序列的队伍配备保障知识产权法院的有效运行。     

The beginning of university entrepreneurship in Japan: TLOs and bioventures lead the way

Following reforms between 1998 and 2004, Japan’s technology transfer system closely resembles the U.S. Bayh-Dole system. Numbers of TLO patents and licenses and numbers of startups are respectable compared to U.S. numbers shortly after enactment of Bayh-Dole. However, capabilities of TLOs vary, average royalties are low, and business prospects for most startups seem limited. In contrast, joint research with companies is increasing rapidly. Most joint research inventions are jointly owned giving the companies an automatic de facto, non-transferable, royalty-free and license. Data from one university show a large proportion of engineering and materials/chemistry inventions are attributed to joint research with large companies, thus limiting opportunities for startup formation and licensing to other small companies. (In biomedicine, pre-emption of discoveries by joint research is less.) Pre-emption of university discoveries (often publicly funded) under joint research agreements recreates the pre-reform system, where corporate donations also enabled pre-emption of discoveries. Like the old system, the new system is advantageous to established companies. Strengthening the formal system (including programs to assist startups) may redress this balance and give Japan the benefits of both types of technology transfer systems.

SSL VPN在校园网中的应用研究

校园网内网资源对于学校日常办公、教学、科研都非常重要,然而保护资源安全和方便校园网外部师生访问是矛盾的,而SSL VPN是一种新兴的以HTTPS为基础的VPN技术,为用户远程访问校园内部网络提供了安全保证,解决了学院师生无法利用互联网访问校园网内学院资源的问题.     

溢价发行可以休矣

股票溢价发行制度是中国股市的问题之源,要解决中国股市的问题,必须坚决废止溢价发行制度。同时应当采取缩减非溢价股、注销部分已经超额分红的非溢价股等办法,以解决溢价发行制度遗留下来的问题。     

知识产权权利客体析疑

知识产权法律制度既保护智力成果、也保护非智力成果,既保护创造性的智力成果、也保护非创造性的智力成果,既保护劳动、也保护投资,而许多创造性的智力成果并未纳入知识产权法的保护范围。今天“知识产权法”已经名不副实,它保护的对象并不是“知识”,而知识产权的权利客体也不完全是“智力成果”。     

基于信息家电的可重构协议栈的设计与实现

针对信息家电上网的协议栈移植、地址资源有限等问题,设计并实现了一种可重构的嵌入式TCP/IP协议栈。该协议栈可以根据用户需求重构为IPv4.IPv6等多种协议栈,可以为家电上网以及其他嵌入式应用系统的远程网络控制提供一种良好的解决方案。     

Intellectual property (IP) protection versus IP abuses: The recent development of Chinese IP abuse rules and recommendations for foreign technology-driven companies

This paper will focus on the recent development of the Chinese IP abuse legislation and its potential impact on IP protection and the operation of technology-driven foreign enterprises in China. Firstly, it will provide a brief overview of the TRIPS's requirements on IPR abuse and technology transfer, and the recent development of IP abuse laws at the domestic level, particularly in the US and the EC. Secondly, by drawing a comparison with similar laws in the US and the EC, this paper will critically examine the recent development of the Chinese laws regarding technology transfer and IP abuse prevention, including both the recently enacted Anti-Monopoly Law 2008 (AML) and other prior-AML regulations. Thirdly, the paper will examine both opportunities and potential risks these laws may bring to foreign IP holders/technology-driven companies when operating in China, particularly focusing on the impact of the IP-related provision in the AML. Recent development in antitrust litigation in which Microsoft is a party, including the recent anti-monopoly investigation against Microsoft in China, will also be examined. Lastly, it will provide some practical suggestions for foreign IP holders and technology-driven companies to operate in China, such as useful defences against potential IP abuse claims, and other strategies for flexibly applying the IP abuse rules and better participating in future IP abuse legislative process in China.     

公用事业特许经营中的临时接管制度研究——从“首例政府临时接管特许经营权案”切入

在公用事业特许经营的实施过程中,当公共利益遭受或面临重大损害时,监管者有权采取临时接管措施来保障公用事业运营的连续性和稳定性。我国公用事业特许经营临时接管制度立法明显滞后,临时接管权的行使隐藏着巨大风险。为了保障临时接管权的正确运用,防止特许经营者的合法权益遭受损害,未来立法应当着重就临时接管的主体、条件、程序、终止等问题做出统一规定。     

日本知识产权高等法院

从20世纪90年代开始，日本经济就一直处于停滞不前的状态，日本总结其原因后提出了“信息创新时代，知识产权立国”的建设方针。知识产权施法改革也是日本知识产权立国的重要内容。2005年4月1日日本成立知识产权高等法院，统一审理知识产权民事和行政上诉案件，优化司法复审资源配置，有效保护知识产权。日本知识产权高等法院其实并不是一个独立的高等法院，它属于东京高等法院；但是它又是一个相对独立的机构，有自己的法院院长，有独立的法官和独立的专门委员。日本知识产权高等法院设置有其自己特色，如专门委员制度、大合议制度，管辖分为技术型案件和非技术型案件。结合日本知识产权高等法院的特点和我国知识产权法院发展的情况来看，日本知识产权高等法院模式对我国知识产权法院的设立及发展有一定的借鉴意义。