学术造假的博弈分析及治理对策

学术造假行为的蔓延,损害了学术的纯洁性和原创性,阻碍了我国学术水平的提高和与国际学术界接轨的进程,危害了社会和他人,有必要加以治理。文章从治理学术造假的角度出发,利用博弈论的基本原理对学术造假行为进行了经济博弈分析,并提出了治理学术造假的策略和措施。     

地方事务划分的立法困惑及其理论解答——以台湾地区地方自治的理论与实践为基础

台湾地区推行地方自治,地方事务划分是实现地方自治的前提条件。为了切实保障地方自治,台湾地区所适用的“中华民国宪法”对地方事务作了列举规范,作为一般法律的“地方制度法”也对地方事务的划分作了列举规范。不同效力等级的法规范都对地方事务作了规定,于是产生监督方式区别问题,台湾当局与所属县市地方事务纵向划分问题及地方事务分类问题,现有的法规范并没有给予清楚的心答。在加强地方自治权限思潮的影响下,台湾理论界对之作了回答。     

Coming out of the shadow? Studies of local governments in Central and Eastern Europe in European academic research

This article is an analysis of the changing role of research on local governments in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) within mainstream European studies. It refers to dependency theory (Wallerstein, Prebish) as applied to scientific research. It classifies CEE as being in the semi-periphery of academic research. The empirical analysis consists of two parts: (1) qualitative review of the most important of the comparative studies of European local governments. It includes a discussion on the role of local governments and researchers from CEE in these studies; (2) quantitative based on an analysis of articles published in international journals and citations for those articles in Scopus. The analysis covers 14 countries (all new member states who joined the EU from 2004 onwards, plus the Balkan countries: Albania, Macedonia, and Serbia).     

大学制度改革倾向性的分析

处于不同时代、不同文化传统与社会背景之下发生的大学制度改革,在性质、趋向、内容等方面存在着较大的差别.引起大学制度改革的主要因素和大学制度改革的目的,往往规定了大学制度改革的趋向,使其带有明显的倾向性.就历史上曾经发生过的以及当代的大学制度改革来看,大致存在着这样几种倾向性,即学术倾向性、政治倾向性、经济倾向性.分析这些倾向性将有助于我们加深对大学制度改革的理解与认识.     

学术编辑知识创新及其实现

学术编辑知识创新是知识创新工程的组成部分,其创新活动贯穿于学术编辑全过程,创新成果构成新的学术编辑知识树;学术编辑知识创新包括条件知识、本体知识和实践知识三个层面。学术编辑知识增长的核心是知识创新,知识增长因人而异,具有不同的途径和方法;学术编辑知识创新的价值是其创新的有用性,主要表现在对本业的促进与实用,同时又进而表现为对社会的贡献;学术编辑已有知识同所从事的职业所需要的知识不相适应的矛盾是其知识创新的基本矛盾,是产生和推动学术编辑知识创新的动力源。学术编辑知识创新及其实现有其基本的层面、步骤、规律与模式,应区别对待。     

University mission and academic freedom: Are they irreconcilable?

Educational freedom, rightly understood, depends upon the freedom to shape - and (for individuals) to choose to study in or teach in - distinctive educational institutions. This implies an obligation upon faculty who have chosen to commit themselves to such an institution to teach in a way that engages positively with its educational project. Policies which provide scope and encouragement for schools and universities to represent distinctive and coherent viewpoints are an essential condition of educational freedom in a pluralistic society. These issues are discussed with reference to the ‘values project‘ of Free University in Amsterdam and to debates, in the Netherlands and the United States, over the distinctive character of schools. This revised version was published online in August 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

中国宪法研究问题域的区分与解释

中国宪法研究的相关成果存在着诸多问题。如对这些问题加以审视,可以认为学术逻辑链条的断裂与跨越是导致问题的主因。如果从中国宪法研究所应关注的问题域入手,就可把问题域区分为基本与内生问题域、扩展问题域和实践问题域。基本与内生问题域主要解决中国宪法研究所要处理的概念问题,扩展问题域主要解决基本与内生概念内涵的丰富与拓展问题,实践问题域主要是对基本与内生问题域和扩展问题域的应用及在应用过程中对之进行调整和矫正。三个问题域的先后顺序与彼此关系构成了中国宪法研究所应遵循的学术逻辑链条,同时,也只有在三个问题域之间形成良性的动态关系,才会保证中国宪法研究的品质。