行政合理性原则之内涵重塑与现实运用

行政合理性原则作为行政法基本原则已经受理论和实践的巨大挑战,重新界定行政合理性原则具有重要的理论和实际意义。     

规范公共行政行为必须控制政府组织的自利动因

公共行政行为的实施者是政府组织 ,作为社会公共利益的最高代表者不应具有自利动因。而事实上政府组织因其具有“经济人”特征 ,同样拥有自身的特殊利益 ,这种特殊利益往往随着社会分工的发展而日益突出 ,并由此而产生追逐自身利益最大化的自利动因。必须通过控制政府组织的自利动因 ,来规范公共行政行为 ,以达到保证公共行政行为在规范化轨道上健康运行的目的。     

中国行政咨询机制的构建与完善

我国虽初步建立起了有中国特色的咨询体系,但还存在许多问题。因此,研究探索和不断完善政府咨询机制,对提高政府决策的有效性,提高公共政策制定和执行的质量,打造诚信政府等都有着十分重要的理论与实践意义。     

具体行政行为概念的再梳理

具体行政行为是行政法学上一个最为基本的范畴,由于理论研究视野的局限和实用主义的误导,我国行政法学界相当一部分人曾一度对我国传统具体行政行为的概念提出了诸多质疑。从完善我国行政法学理论体系和行政程序立法的视角来看,正确认识具体行政行为的概念至为关键。本文从大陆法系、英美法系具体行政行为内涵的演进出发,分析并探讨了学术界对具体行政行为概念界定产生差异的原因,提出了本文对具体行政行为概念的认识。     

俄中关系和俄罗斯社会经济现状

近年来,俄中的战略合作伙伴关系有了进一步发展。2001年俄罗斯经济发展指标反映了其社会、经济发展状况,俄罗斯实施了一系列行政改革的措施。国家公务员学院的研究领域更加宽泛。     

公共政策中的集团决策模型及在我国的适应性

如何制定出科学有效的、反映各方面利益并为社会所普遍认同的公共政策,是所有现代政府所面临的基本问题以及获得政治合法性的关键所在。通过描述社会政治现象,分析政府行为,探讨集团决策模型的起源、基本内容、主要缺陷及其在我国现实政治中的发展等问题,建立起公共政策决策中的集团决策模型的基本理念和分析框架,可为我国公共政策决策的科学化和民主化提供有益的思路。     

The `Ideal' Victim v Successful Rape Complainants: Not What You Might Expect

This article proposes that feminist legal critics need to be able to explain how some rape cases succeed in securing convictions. The means by which rape cases are routinely disqualified in the criminal justice system have received widespread attention. It is well established in feminist legal critique that female complainants are discredited if they fail to conform to an archaic stereotype of the genuine or ‘real’ rape victim. This victim is not only morally and sexually virtuous she is also cautious, unprovocative, and consistent. Defence tactics for discrediting rape testimony involve exposing the complainant's alleged failure to comply with the sexual and behavioural standards of the normative victim. This understanding of how rape complain(an)ts are disqualified is not predictive, however, of the complainants whose cases succeed in securing convictions. This article reviews some successful Australian rape cases and considers the ways in which they disturb feminist understandings of how rape complaints are discredited in the criminal justice system. It proposes that recent research analysing the discourse of rape trials provides a way of explaining the apparent discrepancies between the ‘ideal’ rape victim and successful complainants. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

行政公益诉讼制度初探

传统诉讼法理论将原告资格限制在申诉人须与本案有直接利害关系 ,这样 ,当国家利益和社会公益遭受行政行为非法侵害时或有侵害之虞时 ,公民便无法通过司法手段来维护这一公益。行政公益诉讼制度的出现 ,既是诉讼法对其自身只顾及保护私人利益的狭隘性突破 ,也是对传统行政诉讼法律制度的超越。     

Sequencing of intersecting lines by combined lifting process and scanning electron microscopy

The chronological order in which two intersecting writing or typed strokes were made can be determined for several combinations of writing media by scanning electron microscope (SEM) examination, a lifting and transfer technique using Kromekote paper, or a combination of the transfer technique followed by SEM examination of the remaining material in the intersection. When non-destructive examination cannot provide unambiguous determination of sequence, judicious choice by the document examiner of which technique to use for a given combination of writing media and paper type can be made using known characteristics of the materials involved. The range of line-crossings which can be reliably sequenced is greater using a combined transfer and SEM technique than when the examination is limited to either technique alone.