刑法机能产生的制度基础

刑法的整体机能是由刑法的诸多构成要素共同相互作用的结果,但是,对于刑法的每一种具体机能来说,其产生却分别由刑法不同的构成要素所决定。考察刑法机能产生的制度基础,其实践上的意义在于:我们可以在对刑法机能与刑法构成要素之间的关系进行充分了解的基础上,通过优化刑法的结构而建构刑法机能的良性机制;以技术手段增加刑法的有效性,使刑法真正成为有目的的社会控制手段。     

Developmental trends of delinquent attitudes and behaviors: replications and synthesis across domains, time, and samples

Inconsistent findings of attitude-behavior relations are commonly attributed to uncontrolled domain, time, or situational factors. Without integrative work, studies accounting for these factors may further complicate research by introducing potentially numerous third variables and render a coherent understanding of the attitude-behavior relationship even more difficult to achieve. In this paper, a developmental perspective is taken and the attitude-behavior relationship in delinquency is examined using three modes of investigation: multivariate patterns of attitude-behavior associations, their mutual predictability, and their developmental trajectories. Three grade cohorts of public school boys (n=1517 of the first, seventh, and tenth grades, initially) were followed over a period of 4 years, with an average age span of 7–16 years. Correspondence analyses suggested that adolescent boys with a tolerant attitude toward theft or violence were more deviant than those who had actual behavior of theft or violence. Stronger attitude effect on subsequent behavior, relative to behavior effect on subsequent attitudes, was found among boys aged 10–12 years. While mean scores of tolerant attitudes to serious theft and violence increased linearly with their behavior counterparts between 6 and 17 years of age, ages 11 and 14 were two turning points at which most delinquent attitudes and behaviors escalated at a higher speed. In general, delinquent attitudes and behaviors were related to each other in various patterns, and age was a defining factor that provided much of the explanation for the inconsistencies in research findings.     

论中国的合作经济

20世纪 5 0年代中期的合作化 ,从方向上说 ,组织个体劳动者走合作化道路是完全正确的 ,但采取搞政治运动的方式来搞合作化 ,严重违背了自愿互利原则 ,违背了经济规律 ,则不能肯定。从改革开放 2 0多年的实践情况看 ,老模式的集体经济与新模式的合作经济 ,二者的发展态势是不相同的 ,并总结出了 8种合作经济的类型。合作制和集体制尽管都属于公有制范畴 ,但它们是两种不同类型的公有制和企业制度 ,鉴于老的集体经济模式已出现萎缩状态 ,必须进行制度创新 ,按新体制规范发展。     

主体建构性和主体行为宣成性--一种后现代女权主义理论

后现代女权主义以解构主义为目的,放弃了对女性解放具体目标的追求,尽心去解构父权制及男权思想导致的性别歧视和性别压迫,并在此基础上提出了社会性别规定性、主体建构性、主体行为宣成性等理论观点,希望通过打破一些诸如性别、阶级等重要界线,来消除性别不平等.本文试对后现代女权主义这些理论观点、主要代表人物及不足等进行分析和探讨,以期对后现代女权主义有一个较为深入和准确的把握,推动女权主义理论的发展.     

中国政策科学的理论困境及其本土化出路

十多年来,我国政策科学在现实政策问题的推动下显得异常的活跃,但由于理论和方法主要是照搬其他学科和西方的体系,缺乏学科自身理论的建树和创新,这种理论上的困境导致学科整体发展缓慢,使政策科学学科长期停留在较低的水平。从讨论中国政策科学发展的基本情况和特点入手,分析政策科学在中国发展所面临的问题和困境的根源,试图从社会科学本土化的角度探讨中国公共政策科学追求自身完善,摆脱学科发展困境的某些理论和方法的问题。     

邓小平法治思想与当代行政领导行为

邓小平法治思想的核心,就是依法治国,建设社会主义法治国家。本文以邓小平法治思想正视当代行政领导失范现象,并从思想文化和制度建设上入手,扼要分析当代行政领导失范的根本原因,以及规范当代行政领导行为的基本思路。     

Mexicans react to electoral fraud and political corruption: an assessment of public opinion and voting behavior

Despite various electoral reforms enacted in Mexico between 1988 and 1994, large numbers of Mexicans doubted the honesty of elections and the general integrity of their country's policy making process. Such doubts did not automatically lead, however, to support for opposition parties that called for greater democratization. Rather, voter preferences were largely dependent on judgments about the opposition's viability and competence. Widespread suspicions about fraud and corruption in Mexico did affect electoral outcomes by making it less likely that potential opposition supporters turned out to vote. Data are drawn from seven national public opinion surveys conducted in Mexico in 1986, 1988, 1991, 1994 (3 polls), and 1995.     

国际金融市场研究方法的逻辑演变——有效市场假说面临的挑战

有效市场假说作为金融经济学的理论基石,无疑是我们研究国际金融市场的重要方法和依据。许多其他得到广泛 应用的金融投资理论皆以此为基础。历经30年的发展,有效市场理论在不断得到支持的同时,也面临了许多新的市场理论的挑 战。混沌理论和分形市场理论,特别是对于市场异象做出新解释的行为金融学,都从不同角度对传统有效市场理论进行了突破。这 不仅为研究国际金融市场提供了新的思路和方法,也对金融市场的决策者和生产者有着巨大的现实意义。     

行政奖励的行政法思考

随着现代政府职能的转变,行政行为表现形式日益多元化,行政机关做出的行政奖励就属于迥异于传统行政行为方式的新型的、有效的行政行为,是世界各国在丰富政府管理手段、提高政府管理水平过程中普遍面临的制度性课题。然而,对于行政奖励的行政法研究,目前在我国仍没有受到应有的关注,导致行政奖励的理论严重滞后于现实要求。     

私分国有资产罪若干问题新解

私分国有资产罪是刑法新增设的罪名,司法实践中对该罪的认定存在认识上的差异。通过重新探讨本罪罪名、性质、犯罪主体、犯罪对象以及客观行为特征等方面的一些具体问题,以求更准确地理解和适用这一罪名。