行政荣誉机制的三重功能

行政荣誉机制具有三个层次的功能 :以道德评价的形式 ,通过对公务员个体进行道德激励和利益激励 ,促使个人有充分的道德自觉 ,促成完整人格的最终完成 :具有提高行政组织效率、增强行政组织的凝聚力、促进廉洁政府目标的实现、提升政府形象的功能 ;对社会 ,具有导向、示范的功能 ,并能最大限度地增进公共利益。     

“三个代表”、公共利益与政府改革

本文认为,“三个代表”思想的核心和归宿是代表最广大人民群众的根本利益问题,即公共利益。为实现这个目标,中国共产党作为执政党,通过公共财政、公共政策和公共管理等一系列公共机构的公共服务,政府行为是公共服务的载体,去实现公共利益。最大程度地表达和实现公共利益,是政府行政伦理的根本问题,而完成这个行政伦理的关键,是保证政府行为与公共利益的互动关系。政府改革正是建立和调整这一互动机制的动态变革过程。     

论儒家思想对培养公安院校大学生职业道德的作用

儒家思想博大精深,内容丰富,日益受到全世界的重视。其中的公忠为国、明义重公思想,重民爱民的“民本主义”思想,秉公执法、廉洁奉公的思想,忠于职守“敬事而信”、“行之以忠”的敬业乐业精神,见义勇为、成仁取义的献身精神,对培养公安院校大学生应具备的人民警察的“立警为公、执法为民”,秉公执法、清正廉洁,爱岗敬业、恪尽职守以及不怕牺牲、勇于献身的职业道德具有非常重要的借鉴意义。     

孟子论舜所涉道德判断与选择问题初探——以“不告而娶”为中心

孟子对舜的诸多论述体现出独特的观念：首先,孝作为一种道德原则源于人的本性之善。其次,孝是具有最高价值的道德原则,它不仅能够实现于血亲关系和家庭中,也可推及于社会群体及天地万物,具有强大的示范与感化作用。再次,在具体的实践方式上,为人子者应顺乎父母、得乎父母,对父母时时保持发诸本心的诚与敬。最后,在不同的道德原则发生冲突时,应根据具体情境选择具有更高价值的道德原则作为判断与选择的标准,做到原则性与灵活性的统一。     

‘There will be burning and a‐looting tonight’: The Social and Political Correlates of Law‐breaking

In the aftermath of the August 2011 riots, politicians and commentators offered a range of explanations for the social unrest and wanton violence. Drawing on survey and focus‐group data, this paper investigates those explanations by analysing how socio‐economic, normative and political factors shape contemporary attitudes towards law breaking in Britain. The paper finds that both economic deprivation and personal moral values help to explain attitudes toward illegal behaviour, but citizens’ mistrust of political leaders and their disengagement from public affairs are also an important factor. The findings suggest that politicians who want to provide moral leadership need to do so through their actions as well as their words.     

法官非物质利益保障的价值基础与制度建构——以法官角色伦理为视角

本文从法官角色伦理分析出发,分析法官职业的本质,从法律的不确定性与法官角色伦理的博弈中引出法官的任职保障制度对于做好"法律世界中"法官的重要价值意义。文章从确保法官职业身份、树立法官职业尊荣、强化法官职业队伍三方面就法官非物质利益保障的若干问题进行探讨。     

Fractured International Environmental Governance and the Potential Role of the Commonwealth in Biodiversity and Climate Change

Abstract

This paper begins by examining the reasons behind most failures of governance, including fault lines in institutional and professional specialisation, and in ideology. These three, forever competing within and between themselves, frustrate attempts to find solutions to some of the world's most pressing challenges. Not least among these are environmental challenges, where preferences and priorities that are geographically, professionally or ideologically narrow inevitably fail to achieve solutions for the greater good. What role can the Commonwealth play in addressing the fracture lines that bedevil solutions for climate change and biodiversity? It may help to stimulate global action on these issues if it can encourage agreement across multidimensional global boundaries. We know the Commonwealth is not a leading global force for controlling climate change or biodiversity loss; but if it had the political will it could be an exemplar of how, between a group of vastly diverse countries across the globe—and on the global political stage—binding agreement and positive action on climate change and biodiversity could be promoted and perhaps achieved. One of the strongest features of the Commonwealth is the generation of long-standing legal and ethical norms whose appeal is obvious even if their implementation is lacking. These norms should not be limited to the rule of law, democracy and human rights, but should include environmental norms because these too are fundamental to a satisfactory human condition.     

“会见不被监听”律师职业伦理的挑战及应对

我国新《刑事诉讼法》第37条中的“律师会见犯罪嫌疑人、被告人时不被监听”应当理解为“在辩护律师会见犯罪嫌疑人、被告人时,侦查、检察和审判机关不得通过任何电子设备获取或者派员在场旁听其谈话内容。”“会见不被监听”在赋予辩护律师与犯罪嫌疑人、被告人秘密自由交流权利的同时,对辩护律师的职业伦理提出了挑战。为保证辩护律师不滥用会见权,我国可以建立司法行政机关驻看守所监督律师会见制度。     

历史演绎正义:论有限责任制度之伦理进路

伦理融入法律促使法律制度蕴含人文气息而富有长盛不衰的生命力,有限责任制度是公司安身立命的前提性基础,有限责任的伦理决定了公司法的伦理内涵与人文精神.历史上的有限责任初显可能是出于经济需要,而有限责任旺盛的生命力则必然有其伦理性依归,有限责任制度化、规模化发展的本身体现着公众的伦理抉择.有限责任经历了从初期的个体间约定责任的民法选择到法律认可并予以制度化适用的商法选择,这个过程是伦理域内信任到信用的伦理过程,是契约自由和经济理性发挥能动性的过程,因此,有限责任的进化历程是人类衡平各方利益的伦理化进程.