置身群众之中 必将克服腐败

治腐良方在哪里?铲腐力量蕴藏在群众之中,只有深入群众,才能反腐倡廉;当前深入群众要廓清六个糊涂认识。     

论“亚腐败”文化影响下党的作风建设

"亚腐败"极易导致不正之风盛行,损害公共权力的廉洁性,影响党群关系和谐。对"亚腐败"零容忍、进行标本兼治,才能真正有效地提升新时期党的作风建设科学化水平。     

Skilled hands,strong spirits: a century of building trade history,by Grace Palladino

When a hired thug hurled acid in the face of the prominent newspaper columnist, Victor Riesel, in 1956, the attack left him permanently blind. The incident appeared to dramatically vindicate Riesel's repeated warnings about the dangerous power of labor racketeers and it helped spur the creation of the largest ever congressional investigation into union corruption, the McClellan Committee hearings (1957–1959). This article raises important questions about the accepted version of why this attack occurred and what it meant. It uses recently released documents from the FBI as well as records from the McClellan Committee's staff. The article also suggests that several governmental bodies, including the FBI and the US Attorney's Office, played a role in furthering the public's misunderstanding of this episode. In so doing it offers a new understanding about how the issue of union corruption came to assume an important place on the nation's political agenda in this era.     

为政之要贵在廉洁,反腐倡廉重在自律

腐败是一种社会现象 ,它的产生有着深刻的社会原因和个人原因。反腐倡廉重在自律。自律就是以自己的内因抵制不良外因的作用 ,就是通过保持自己的纯洁克服不良社会因素的影响     

新形势下腐败犯罪的防治

在新形势下,腐败犯罪已经在国家权力结构各个层面爆发出来。从控制理论上看,官场是一个高风险的职务犯罪行业,官员成为潜在的职务犯罪人。在这种现实下,观念的转变是至关重要的。从历史经验与社会发展看,腐败犯罪预防与治理的根本出路是中国特色的权力法治化,尤其是权力结构转型过程中有特色的法治演化过程。在对策上,应立足现实,进行调控制度创新,让权力在制度笼子中运行。     

村官腐败及其治理

村官腐败在高官大吏腐朽堕落的阴影下被遮蔽和保护起来，在大词腐败学的研究中受到冷落，但在和谐社会构建和建设新农村的背景下，其严重性日益凸显。村官腐败是由各种因素促成的，是一种“综合症”，但最重要的还是整体社会转型的结构性空间转换造成的。当然其治理也应是一种所谓的综合治理，通过权力与权利．制度与人心的多向互动达致乡村的善治。     

新中国成立初腐败发生源的政治生态学分析

新中国成立后,腐败现象和行为并没有伴随新政权和新社会的建立而彻底消失,反而由于受到权力运行外环境社会变革中的某些不成熟和不完善的环节、部分,以及权力运行体系自身内环境中隐藏的风险的双重作用,一度相当"猖獗"。这些特殊化劣变生态因子的滋生,说明了新中国成立初反腐斗争的艰巨性、复杂性,以及反腐败所取得的成绩来之不易;同时也表明,政府反腐败政治体系的构建不是"一劳永逸"的,必须在科学分析和把握具体政治生态环境特征的基础上实行"与时俱进"。     

再谈公车改革

推动公车改革，遏制公车腐败，是一项能够消减腐败土壤，提升党的形象，获取公众支持，进而巩固党的执政地位的工作。公车改革探索已走过18个年头，虽然取得了一定成效，但仍然没有达到理想效果，距离节约、高效、廉洁的目标还有一定差距。深刻认识公车改革与巩固党的执政地位的关系，积极推进公车改革，有效遏制公车腐败，仍然是一个必须解决的重要问题。     

Corporate power in Australian policy making: The case of unfair contract laws

There is increasing concern about the impact of corporate power on Australian policy making. This article examines the dynamics of corporate influence by examining the battle between big business and small business over “unfair contract” laws. It explores whether big business exerted disproportionate power, and if it did whether it was structural, ideational, or instrumental power. It finds that while recent scholarship has been focused on structural and ideational sources of power, there is strong evidence of a narrowly conceived instrumental power exerting considerable influence within both of the major parties. Further, it concludes this form of instrumental power presents the most serious threat to democratic policy making.     

What causes employees to whistle while they work? Factors affecting internal whistle‐blowing in the Australian Public Service

What causes employees in the Australian Public Service (APS) to internally blow the whistle on corruption in the workplace? This research examines the impact of the nature of corruption, organisational culture, and employees’ work attitudes and actions on internal whistle‐blowing in the APS. The respondents were found to internally blow the whistle for most types of corruption: fraud, conflict of interest, unlawful disclosure of government information, and perverting the course of justice. Their whistle‐blowing behaviour was, however, unaffected by observations of theft of official assets. They were also unlikely to report observations of cronyism and nepotism. Active observers of workplace bullying (those who have blown the whistle after witnessing someone else being bullied) were three times more likely to also internally report corruption than inactive observers of bullying.