World Leaders' Gatherings: From APEC to G20

正From Beijing to Naypyitaw and then Brisbane,world leaders had a tight schedule from November 7 to 16 that entailed attending several major international conferences in the Asia-Pacific region.On the global stage,Chinese leaders announced the country’s new proposals on international governance.     

我国城市社区民主治理的困境与出路

积极推进城市社区民主治理对我国的民主政治建设和法治进程具有重要而深远的影响,但宥于我国历史传统和民主法治国情,城市社区民主治理仍存在民主权利与民主需求、民主需求与民主实践、民主实践与民主权利之间不相协调的问题,使得社区民主治理陷入"权利-需求-实践"的困境,这严重阻碍着中国城市社区建设及基层民主政治的健康发展。当务之急是结合我国实际,完善民主权利,满足民主需求,深化民主实践,积极探索具有我国特色的城市社区民主治理之路。     

全球治理视阈下我国外交的应对方略

全球治理是应对全球化的一种反应,它的出现是对传统国际关系的挑战。全球治理已是不可逆转的历史趋势,它给中国的内政外交带来了难以估量的冲击和影响。我国外交必须制定出应对方略:坚持"发展中国家"的属性与定位,统筹协调好大国关系,打牢同发展中国家互信合作的基础,推进周边区域治理,开展好公共外交,善用并倚重各种全球治理平台,参与全球化,推进全球治理。     

新型工业化发展的实践与思考——以沿河土家族自治县为例

本文从该县工业发展的历史状况及评价、工业发展的困境与优势分析、新型工业化建设的进展情况、推进新型工业化面临的主要困难和问题、加快推进新型工业化的建议等五个方面进行了深入的分析与论证。     

论和谐治理与合作型政府治理模式构建

和谐社会的理想境界要靠以政府为主导的和谐治理来实现;以政府为主导的和谐治理可称为合作型政府治理模式。合作的时代诉求和现实基础彰显了选择该模式的必要与可行。合作型政府治理模式的基本特征是:多元主体,民主决策,法治化管理,市场和社会化服务,责任过程和效能结果。该模式的构建须有宽容态度和发展眼光,需要提高民主法治质量,发展公民社会,建立协商对话机制与合作文化环境,加快行政改革,推进政府转型。     

审视与整合：超越统治与治理的视野

笔者从辩证唯物主义的角度出发,将统治与治理相融合,提出“第三种模式”,并且阐释了“第三种模式”的基本理念、基本价值,以及实现的基本路径。     

论国有独资公司治理结构的完善——基于新《公司法》的考量

完善的国有独资公司治理结构是国有独资公司规范运作的前提,也是国有独资公司健康发展的关键所在。新《公司法》对国有独资公司的治理结构作出了新的规定,但仍有许多不完善的地方,架构新的国有独资公司治理结构仍是保证国有独资公司健康发展的当务之急。我们应在明确国有资产监督管理机构职责、加强董事会决策、监事会监督、充分发挥银行在治理结构中的作用等方面对国有独资公司治理结构加以完善。     

县域社会经济发展与府际关系的调整——以金华—义乌府际关系为个案研究

县域社会经济的迅猛发展带来传统府际关系的矛盾冲突,从经济关系、行政关系和治理关系这一三维分析框架剖析这一矛盾冲突,能有效解释地方府际关系变迁与发展的逻辑。金华—义乌府际关系的典型案例可以得出三个结论:(1)合理的经济关系必须符合市场经济规律的客观要求,它不仅仅是单向的辐射关系,而且更是双向的对流关系。(2)科学的行政关系必须回应权力运行的规则,它不是单一的行政管辖,而是双方的权力互动。(3)和谐的治理关系必须基于社会发展的规律,它不是单边的各自为政,而是双边的利益共生。惟其如此,地方府际关系才能从根本上实现长效的制度安排,并为地方政治文明、物质文明和精神文明的发展提供永续的制度支持。     

On the Regulation of the Discretion of Environmental Administrative Punishment: Based on the Framework of the Modernized Environment Governance System

With the increasing environmental risks, the limitations of legislative regulation, negative judicial regulation and weak administrative regulation make it difficult to regulate the exercise of the discretion of environmental administrative punishment, which also increases the difficulty of the implementation of environmental administrative penalty decisions. The government, enterprises and the public three-dimensional main body structure constructed by the modern environmental governance system provides a new framework for the discretionary regulation of environmental administrative punishment. Based on the traditional theories of administrative Law, three regulation mechanisms can be formed,which include administrative self-control, negotiation regulation, and the social regulation. These three regulatory mechanisms working together in the whole process of environmental administration would regulate and restrict the exerting of discretion of environmental administrative punishment.     

Citizens’ Perceptions of Governance in Rural and Urban China

This article presents three main findings from a purposive stratified survey of urban and rural residents. First, Chinese citizens “disaggregate” the state with high levels of satisfaction for Central government that fall dramatically as government gets closer to the people. Satisfaction levels are noticeably lower for those in rural China. Second, attitudes about the way policy is implemented by local governments raise concerns. Irrespective of place of residence, respondents feel that when implementing policy local officials and governments are mainly concerned with their own interests, are more receptive to the views of their superiors rather than those of ordinary people, favor those with money, and are formalistic in implementing policy rather than dealing with actual problems. Third, the areas of work that citizens would really like government to concentrate on are job creation and providing basic guarantees to protect against the shocks of the transition to a market economy. Tony Saich is the Daewoo Professor of International Affairs, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University and Director of the Harvard University Asia Center. His recent research focuses on the development of social policy in China, particularly on the provision of public goods by local governments. His publications include Governance and Politics of China by Palgrave and edited volumes on Financial Sector Reform in China (with Yasheng Huang and Edward Steinfeld) and AIDS and Social Policy in China (with Joan Kaufman and Arthur Kleinman both by Harvard University Asia Center. He would like to thank Edward Cunningham for his great help in preparing this article. He also wants to thank Victor Yuan (Horizon Market Research Company) for his tremendous help in designing the survey and implementing it. In addition, I would like to thank Anita Chan, Martin King Whyte and two anonymous reviewers for their extremely helpful comments on an earlier draft.