盗窃油气案件司法解释第3条第2款的理解适用

"两高"新近颁布了盗窃油气案件司法解释,其中第3条第2款规定:"盗窃油气,数额巨大但尚未运离现场的,以盗窃未遂定罪处罚."通过分析可以看出,该规定既未提供盗窃油气案件既遂未遂的标准,也并非提示性规定.在盗窃油气数额较大,但尚未运离现场的情形下,虽然形式上符合盗窃未遂,但结合数额较大以及尚未运离现场考虑,可认定为情节显著轻微危害不大,符合刑法但书规定从而不认为是犯罪.而在数额巨大但尚未运离现场的情形下,则不符合但书规定,从而构成盗窃未遂.     

关于《劳动合同法》第14条的溯及力的法理分析

《劳动合同法》第14条引起了广泛争议并产生了很大社会影响,争议的焦点是有关年限的规定是否具有溯及力的问题。依据法不溯及既往原则,《劳动合同法》原则上不具有溯及力,但由于《劳动合同法》的立法意图旨在保护劳工利益,加之《劳动合同法》吸收了《劳动法》的有关规定,因而使某些有关年限的起点具有溯及力。这样把握既不违反法不溯及既往原则,同时也保护了劳工的正当权益。不过应该有个过渡办法,《劳动合同法》实施前企业对劳工的福利欠债可以考虑由政府"埋单"而不能完全推给企业。     

Yan Ping: Deal with the Eternal

正"A lot of Chinese painters today work in a realist style because they believe it is more objective in dealing with current events and that seems to be popular.I work in an expressionist style and thematically,I deal with that which is eternal."THERE are far fewer contemporary Chinese female artists than male artists,especially painters.That is a simple fact substantiated for the most part in the marketplace but also,statistically,by the number of female artists whose work is exhibited in museums.Yan Ping is an exception.She     

刑事诉讼中的网络传闻证据规则初论

随着网络技术的迅猛发展,网络证据开始大量出现,这导致刑事诉讼中的网络传闻证据规则也日益具备实际价值。网络传闻证据规则确立的现实必要性在于信息时代电子证据运用愈发普遍和电子证据很难借助传统传闻证据规则进行可采性评判。对于刑事诉讼中的网络传闻证据规则的具体建构设计,应从网络传闻证据界定和例外范畴设置两方面着手。     

探求刑事证据规则的和谐

刑事证据规则从其适用的范围看,可分为原则性刑事证据规则与例外性刑事证据规则。原则性刑事证据规则重在保障人权,例外性刑事证据规则重在打击犯罪。刑事证据规则是否和谐,主要体现在能否恰当地处理原则性规则与例外性规则的关系上。和谐的刑事证据规则不仅有利于证据准确适用,而且有利于诉讼和谐和社会和谐。     

What the Trial Judge Needs to Know about the Convention of 23 November 2007 on the International Recovery of Child Support and Other Forms of Family Maintenance

Since the 1950s, there have been several international multi‐lateral treaties for recognition and enforcement of child and spousal support orders. They operated, primarily, in civil law countries where “creditor‐based jurisdiction” allowed establishment of an order in the country of habitual residence of the child or the custodial parent. The United States, requiring “minimum contacts” with the debtor to establish personal jurisdiction, could not be a party to such agreements. For nearly fifty years the U.S., and a few states, sought to fill the need for international reciprocity by negotiating individual country‐to‐country or state‐to‐country arrangements. With ratification of the 2007 Family Maintenance Convention, the United States was finally able to join in a multi‐lateral treaty. The treaty took effect in the United States on January 1, 2017, establishing procedures for international recognition, enforcement and modification of family support orders with 35 other countries already party to the Convention (including the entire European Union). The grand bargain struck during the negotiations between 2003 and 2007 was that the U.S. would honor a foreign order if, under the facts presented, there were sufficient minimum contacts with the debtor that would have supported personal jurisdiction if the order had been entered in any state in the U.S. If unable to recognize a foreign order, the U.S. agreed to take steps to issue a new one. The treaty establishes administrative procedures that, in many respects, are nearly identical to interstate enforcement of domestic support orders in this country. But there are also aspects of the treaty that are entirely new and warrant explanation for family and juvenile court judges. This article focuses on several unique provisions of the treaty that judges and attorneys need to understand.     

论严格相符标准的软化处理--轻微瑕疵例外

由于严格相符标准过于机械、刚性,各国对其进行了适当的软化处理(Soften Processing).轻微瑕疵例外就是其中得到各国多数学者和法官支持的一个理论.本文对轻微瑕疵例外的概念进行了总结,并分析了其构成要件,进而对国际商会的UCP500和ISBP规则已接受该理论进行了论证.我国法院在信用证案件审理过程中也应接受轻微瑕疵例外理论.     

非法经营同类营业罪研究

非法经营同类营业罪以公司董事、经理竞业禁止义务为基础 ,该罪认定的核心问题 ,如自营或为他人经营、同类营业、非法利益等理论界定需要从公司法制的角度来廓清。但由于公司法上竞业禁止理论的缺陷而导致上述问题边界不清 ,所以很有探究的必要。涉及有身份者与无身份者共同犯罪、无非法获利而给权利人造成巨大损失的刑事责任问题也有待明确。非法经营同类营业指控存在例外 ,诸如竞业禁止义务免除 ,经法定程序确立的董事经理兼任、因履行公司企业契约等行为不能认为是犯罪     

韩日政府信息公开制度及对我国的启示

韩日政府信息公开制度确立较早,取得了大量经验。我国政府信息公开制度还处在起步、发展阶段。借鉴韩日政府信息公开制度的经验,逐步夯实我国政府信息公开的社会基础;树立我国政府信息公开的正确理念;确定我国政府信息公开的合理范围;建立政府信息公开的审议机构;完善我国政府信息公开的制度体系。     

The Case of the Hypocritical

This paper analyzes the idea of critique as an idea, in relation to the problematic fiction of legal foundations. In doing so, it refers to the work of Giorgio Agamben and Jean-Luc Nancy. In particular, Jean-Luc Nancy’s concept of the lapsus of right (jus) is explored in relation to the fiction of a Law of law and the notion of the Right to have rights. The paper argues for the conception of an immanent critique of law that seeks to have done with foundational judgments as primary to critique. To have done with judgment as primary is crucial as judgment is the way in which philosophies of law have attempted to establish their own justification while claiming that such a ground or justification comes from an external source. Instead, what is to be reconceived and in a preliminary way is that critique and its concepts are intimate to their problems and vice versa. I wish to thank each of the participants to this issue for their effort and their kind collaboration and V. Kelley for her invaluable assistance in the final editing process. I thank C. Douzinas for introducing me to the work of Jean-Luc Nancy and P. Fitzpatrick and S. Motha for sharing their paths of reading. Especial thanks to A.␣Schütz, E. Loizidou, N. Moore, J.á. Bellido Anon and A. Bottomley for discussions on disagreement. Gratitude is owed to J.-L. Nancy for inspiring thoughts and writings and for the sweetness in response to my suggestion that there are no antidotes to the poisons we write. This is for the wonderful Elene.