论教育公平与政府正义

本文从教育公平、政府正义内涵切入,寻求二者在逻辑上的契合,认为教育公平是政府正义的基本指向。目前政府教育资源配置政策与教育法规制定存在双重失衡,当下教育在地区、城乡、阶层和性别间等的不公平现象凸显。匡扶政府正义以促进教育公平,必须注意四个方面,即重铸政府理念、重现制度正义、重塑行政人员美德和重申宪法救济等。     

现行国有资产监管体制的发展趋势

我国现行的国有资产监管体制是随着社会主义市场经济体制的建立和探索逐渐形成的。其优势在统一性、严密性、包容性,劣势在框架狭小、到位缓慢、环境欠佳。本文在利弊分析基础上,认为产融结合、社会文化事业发展和国有资产在监管缝隙中有流失风险的形势,并提出了国资监管体制的趋势性建议。     

国外职业安全与健康政府管制研究综述

职业安全与健康政府管制研究在发达国家已形成比较完善的理论体系。本文在深入分析国外职业安全与健康政府管制相关文献的基础上,对有关研究者的观点进行提炼,并按照职业安全与健康政府管制必要性、管制对象与方法、管制绩效评价三个方面进行综述。国外学者总体上对职业安全与健康政府管制绩效持肯定态度,但也指出管制的负面性,强调:应对政府管制权力加以制约;注重政府管制的方式方法,提高管制效果;加强政府管制绩效评价,树立成本—收益理念。这些可以为我国政府的安全生产管制实践提供借鉴。     

省管县体制改革的政府行为差异与推进策略选择

省管县体制改革是一个制度变迁过程。本文基于新制度经济学的制度变迁理论分析视角,对省管县体制改革动因、政府行为差异进行了理论逻辑和现实情境的阐释,并从省管县幅度、行政区划调整、创新主体、核心制度和配套改革等方面提出制度设计的相关建议。     

论职工民主管理立法的调整对象

职工民主管理法制化是我国民主法制建设的一项重要内容,是市场经济法律体系中的一个重要组成部分。为此,制定一部适应市场经济需要的职工民主管理法显得迫切而且极为重要。在民主管理的立法中,首先需要解决好的一个问题,就是明确民主管理立法中的调整对象。劳动关系、管理关系和为保护劳动关系和实现管理关系而产生的其他社会关系都应纳入民主管理立法的调整范围之内。     

论循环经济法的若干基本问题

当我国启动循环经济立法之际,为明确该立法方向、位阶、体系结构和框架,本文从理论源头上厘清循环经济法的一些基本问题以促进相关立法工作健康发展。     

The Politics of “Fracking”: Regulating Natural Gas Drilling Practices in Colorado and Texas

This article focuses on the politics of regulating natural gas fracking operations in Colorado and Texas. Between‐state differences in the economic importance of natural gas production, political traditions, environmental impacts of drilling activities, and local governmental responses to risk reduction, and entrepreneurial activities are discussed in relation to policy‐making initiatives. In the concluding section, I suggest that Colorado's regulatory approach offers a greater degree of environmental protection than Texas. Key reforms adopted in 2007–8 can be largely attributed to electoral victories that ensured unified party control over state government and the determined efforts of the proenvironmental governor to make changes in both the regulatory commission and in the substance of natural gas drilling policies.     

Focal Points in Public Policy: Evidence from Voluntary Regulation

Numerous studies argue that law affects behavior “expressively”—such as when states create focal points that overcome the coordination difficulties firms face. We argue that governments help firms overcome coordination dilemmas by explicating a preferred strategy for firms weighing investment in voluntary regulation. Firms would prefer to coordinate on a common strategy as a way of reducing the costs of voluntary regulation and increasing its benefits. We test our hypothesis about the efficacy of focal point selection with the European Union's (EU) advocacy of the Eco‐Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS) over a rival environmental management system, International Standards Organization (ISO) 14001. EU nations have statistically significantly lower rates of ISO 14001 certification than comparable countries at least in part due to their advocacy of EMAS. These results emphasize the role the state plays in coordinating business behavior even when such policy is simply expressive.     

浅谈我国网络舆情管控法律体系的建立健全——以美国网络舆情管控为借鉴

网络舆情作为一把双刃剑,在给人们工作、生活带来快捷便利的同时,也能产生巨大的负面效应。当前网络舆情衍生出的网络犯罪有恃无恐、网络谣言蛊惑人心、网络色情泛滥成灾、网络欺诈层出不穷。故而,为维护国家政治安全和社会稳定、保障公民个人权益,必须加强对网络舆情的依法管控。但我国现有网络舆情管控的法律体系在实际管控过程中还暴露出诸多问题,需要借鉴国外先进的管控经验去进一步健全完善。     

The Government’s Regulatory Obligations to Public Utilities Franchise

Under the public utilities franchise system, the executive branch may transfer the task of providing public utilities services for the common good to a private party. It should undertake to regulate and prevent the private party from pursuing its own interests to the detriment of public interest while discharging its duty under the public utilities franchise. Since any public interest must be enjoyed by all individuals, we can say that the obligations owed under administrative regulations aim at the ultimate goal of increasing individual welfare. In the public utilities franchise system, regulations of this kind can be divided into six different categories: maintaining and promoting necessary market competition, ensuring the continuity of public utilities services, ensuring non-discriminatory provision of public utilities services, ensuring the quality of public utilities services, ensuring reasonable charges for public utilities services, and ensuring the conservation of energy and protection of the environment while providing public utilities services. The absence of governmental regulation of the provision of public utilities and of reforms in such services in China has harmed both public interest and the rights and interests of consumers. Some of the problems caused include chaotic market access for public utilities, no guarantee of the sustainability of public utilities, the failure of the universality of public utilities, declining quality of public utilities, sharp rise in the prices of public utilities, insufficient regulations on the conservation of energy and environmental protection, and so on. In order to achieve the effective implementation of the administrative regulations and obligations therein with respect to public utilities and the maximization of public interest, the Chinese government should enhance its consciousness of regulating public utilities, improve the legal system to regulate public utilities, perfect the regulatory system for public utilities, and establish a system of liability to compensate for failures in regulation.