论搜查的理由及证据要求

搜查作为一种强制侦查措施,其对公民的潜在威胁是警察在搜查过程中对公民人身权、财产权和个人隐私权的侵犯。因此,法治国家对搜查采取严格的司法令状主义进行司法控制,并建立严格的证据排除规则体系,对警察非法搜查所获得的利益予以剥夺,以保障公民合法权益不受侵害。警察搜查的权力源于维护公共安全、警察自我防卫、获得刑事诉讼证据的需要。针对警察搜查不同的权力源,在证据要求上也应当不同。     

再论审前准备程序

审前准备程序对提高诉讼质量、效率具有重要作用,在司法实践中,应对审前准备程序进行改革,审前准备程序应依照案件的内容,适用不同的规则和举证时限;我国应进一步完善审前准备程序。     

基于单片机的智能巡线机器人的设计与研究

本文介绍了利用红外反射式传感器实现小车自动识别路线的设计与实现。系统控制核心采用AT89C52单片机,利用模糊算法以及PWM控制方式来实现直流电机的驱动。     

论夜间禁止搜查原则之例外情形

夜间禁止搜查原则之例外情形的规定是为了保障公民的权利与侦查效率而存在的,文章在分析了设置例外情形必要性基础之上,解析了夜间禁止搜查原则之例外的内涵,并对许可搜查、急迫情形、特殊场地等例外情形逐一作了分析评断。     

Control over Personal Data in a Digital Age: Google Spain v AEPD and Mario Costeja Gonzalez

In the Google Spain judgment, the Grand Chamber of the EU Court of Justice determined the circumstances in which a search engine is obliged to remove links to data pertaining to an individual from the results displayed. The Court also considered the material and territorial scope of the EU data protection rules. This note argues that the Court's findings, which have been heavily criticised, are normatively coherent. The broad scope of application of data protection rules and the right of individuals to have their data deleted when certain conditions are fulfilled both play a part in granting individuals effective control over their personal data – an objective of EU data protection law.     

智能信息系统的隐私保护问题研究

智能信息系统是运用人工智能技术的信息系统,可以对信息进行智能分析,实现信息挖掘,从而提升信息的价值。智能信息系统面临的主要挑战在于如何能够在使用个人数据的同时,确保个人身份信息和个人隐私得到保护。智能信息系统隐私权保护是一项系统工程。国家和政府应当在保护个人信息方面更加积极有力。司法机关在保障公民隐私权方面扮演着平衡各方利益的角色。保护公民隐私权,应当强化技术创新。互联网企业应承担起个人数据保护的主体责任,加强自我约束。社会组织收集个人信息不能超过必要的限度与合目的性。个人隐私权遭受侵犯时应积极主动地运用法律捍卫自己的合法权益。     

Suspect graveyard burial (South Armagh,N. Ireland): Combined search,forensic anthropology and radiocarbon dating

Geophysical investigation of a former convent graveyard for conversion to a community centre identified an unrecorded, unmarked burial below a later burial. Archaeological excavation confirmed the presence of skeletonized human remains, considered by police as a possible clandestine burial. Mortuary examination indicated the remains belonged to a mature adult female. To determine whether the deceased could be a recorded missing person, radiocarbon dating was undertaken on a femur and a rib bone. This is not always straightforward, and results showed two possible ages due to intercepts on either side of the nuclear weapons testing spike in atmospheric ¹⁴C; however, the later dated burial allowed us to constrain the date of a rib to CE 1959. This study demonstrates that dating a second tissue with a longer turnaround time, such as a femur, can help to constrain which side of the bomb spike is most probable. This paper documents in one work the search, scene and sample and then advances this to resolution by anthropological analysis and radiocarbon dating of human remains.