培养法律信仰,促进西部开发

法律信仰是法治“硬件”建设的“软件”支撑体系，是西部大开发法治环境建设的内在精神支撑，而西部地区法律信仰现状则不令人乐观。因此，必须从增强立法者、司法人员、领导干部、民众的法律信仰入手，才能创造出良好的法治环境。     

尊严与权利:农民城镇化的核心要素

文章从法学角度研究人的城镇化的核心要素问题,认为农民城镇化的核心要素是农民的尊严和权利,并从城镇化人本主义和法律社会原则两方面加以论证。建议着重维护农民在城镇居住、就业、教育、医疗、社保等方面的尊严和权利。     

Equal reproduction rights? The right to found a family in United Nations’ disability policy since the 1970s

ABSTRACT

With the adoption of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD) in 2006, disability as an issue of human rights and international law can no longer be ignored. The history of this convention can be traced back to the 1970s, when disability was framed in United Nations (UN) declarations as a human-rights issue at the global level. One of the recurrent topics of debate during this trajectory was the right of people with disabilities to found a family. This right was far from self-evident and was evaluated very differently by various stakeholders.

This study follows the right to have a family in UN disability policy since the 1970s. The history of the family in relation to disability at the global level has been a neglected field of enquiry compared to other concepts such as gender and race. This study investigates how and why the right to found a family was framed in the Declarations on the Rights of Mentally Disabled Persons (1971) and Disabled Persons (1975), the International Year of Disabled Persons (1981), the International Decade of Disabled Persons (1983 ? 1992), the Standard Rules on the Equalization of Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities (1993) and the UNCRPD in 2006.

The trajectory of the right of people with disabilities to found a family that emerges from these cases shows a change in the 1990s from a social-policy to a human-rights approach towards disability – which reflects a broader trend in global and local histories of human rights. In the case of reproductive rights of people with disabilities this change meant that the emphasis was laid more on providing a legal protection for the individual against the interference of others (so-called negative freedom) than on enhancing the opportunities for disabled people to practice their (positive) freedom.     

认罪认罚从宽制度背景下被害人权益保护制度研究

当前认罪认罚从宽制度重点聚焦被追诉人的权益保护,而对被害人权益保护却重视不够,存在知情权保障有限、参与权保障不足、赔偿范围偏窄、缺乏值班律师援助等问题和不足,亟待加以完善解决。文章通过梳理认罪认罚从宽制度下的被害人权益保护现状,分析总结存在的问题,并有针对性地提出完善路径,以期对被害人权益保护研究有所裨益。     

完善消费者权益纠纷解决机制的思考

由于个人利益未得到尊重,社会自治能力过度柔弱,消费者纠纷解决机制缺乏可及性,无法承担促进企业履行社会责任的使命。应建立消费者协会调解与仲裁相结合的制度,发挥行政机关解决消费者权益纠纷的作用,完善诉讼机制。     

从权力到权利:算法治理的路径

人工智能时代,算法日益介入社会生活中。我国对算法的治理刚刚起步,现有的算法治理模式并不能适应算法技术的发展。基于对我国算法治理现状和治理困境的分析,提出从权力到权利的算法治理路径,并借助“权利束”这一概念,从整体上对算法权利进行构思,以实现算法控制者和算法相对人的利益平衡。     

Exploring citizenship spheres of inclusion/exclusion: rights as ‘potential for power’

ABSTRACT

Ariely examines the logic of inclusion/exclusion involved in the allocation of social, political and cultural rights to minorities. He argues that the unequal allocation of rights is determined by the degree of potential power inherent in the various types of rights, and that rights with more potential power, such as political and cultural representation rights, challenge the dominant group's position more strongly than rights to social welfare and cultural autonomy. Minorities are included at a higher level in spheres of rights with low potential power, and at a lower level in spheres of rights with higher potential power. He uses the case of the Arab citizens of Israel to illustrate the thesis, reviewing institutional practices of inclusion/exclusion as well as the attitudes of Israeli Jews towards the allocation of different rights as reflected in three attitudinal surveys.     

论矿业权动态持有的经济法治因缘

炒作矿业权是一种违背资源配置与财产权配置的有害行为,资源的稀缺性要求其得到效率性开发,社会发展对资源的依赖性则促进了立法对囤积矿业权的炒作行为的强制干预。矿业权动态持有是市场配置资源规则与投机利益博弈的结果,符合现代民商法的"诚实信用原则",分析其法治性与合理性可为我国新时期的资源立法提供有利参考,确立可持续发展、生态并重的资源财产观。     

大学生劳动维权教育模式的构建研究

目前,我国对大学生劳动维权教育的研究或论述很少,我国高校也并没有形成系统的劳动维权教育模式。大学生主要是通过高校的公共必修课的课程了解劳动保障法规。但是,高校的公共必修课的课程课程中"法律基础"部分涉及到劳动法的内容极少,缺乏针对性,无法达到劳动维权教育的目的。因此,帮助大学新生了解亟需掌握的劳动法律知识,培养我国当前大学生劳动维权教育模式,劳动维权意识是有效开展大学生劳动维权教育的基本途径。     

沉默权论要

刑事诉讼法中的沉默权,是国家公权力与嫌疑人、被告人陈述自由权得到基本平衡的人权保障制度。处理好沉默权与讯问权的关系,有利于提高刑事案件的客观性和准确性,减少因刑讯逼供产生的冤假错案,默示的相对沉默权,是现代文明法治发展的结果,符合我国基本国情及现状。