Educational offer,education demand and institutional capacity

The present world is subject to some structural and institutional transformations unprecedented. The education-a public goods, a product and a process at the same time, is not different especially, since late modernization and modernity make education an essential vector of development. The present study insists on the triad educational offer, education demand and institutional capacity. It starts from the imperatives of knowledge society in globalization era and re-defines the educational market in the context of late modernity. Although the approach of the educational supply, the demand of education and competition on the educational market aims at a factorial analysis initially related to the realities in Romania, the issue is extended globally. The demonstration is simple enough, though the potential capacity （and the real one） of any institution of higher education management must be mediated on educational market. To this effect, the study insists on the objectives and aims of educational management. The premise to fundamentally define this type of management is that the intelligent models, the creative models and the strategic models of thought may contribute to the development of institutional （organizational） culture with axiological appliance, giving both identity and openness to diverse education. The study poses the problem of a new type of educational order, an educational order of a society based on knowledge.     

Making the Most of the First‐Offer Advantage: Pre‐Offer Conversation and Negotiation Outcomes

Why do some negotiators benefit from making the first offer during negotiations while others do not? This study explores the contents of conversations that take place before negotiators make their first offers in order to learn more about the differences between ultimately successful first offers that benefit from anchoring effects and ultimately unsuccessful ones in which negotiators apparently derive no benefit from making the first offer. In‐depth qualitative analyses of the conversations that role players engaged in prior to their first offers were conducted in simulated negotiation exercises. Their analysis identified five different conversational tactics that negotiators employed in one‐on‐one negotiations to gain power in the negotiation, or what they call here “power conversation tactics.” Their findings suggest that the negotiation outcome (i.e., net value) was related to how the negotiators employed and combined these tactics during the pre‐offer conversation. Based on these findings, they conceptualized four types of power‐gaining/power‐losing pre‐offer conversation scenarios and explored the link between negotiation outcomes and each of these types of pre‐offer conversations. This study further develops the literature on power dynamics and conversations in negotiations as well as the literature on the anchoring effect of a first offer.     

Interest Arbitration in the Federal Service

The binding decisions of the Federal Service Impasses Panel are examined through logistic regression and discriminate function analysis. A sample of eighty-four issues decided by the Panel between 1987 and 1999 were coded for content to identify factors influencing Panel decision making. Seven standards are posited as having influence over Panel decisions. The article concludes that the decision processes of the Panel are subject to various arguments used by labor and management, and the impact of these processes on Panel decision making varies by party. Further, final offer procedures are the dominant procedure used by the Panel. Finally, it appears the Panel may weight the arguments of the parties differently depending on the issue in dispute.     

行贿罪"谋取不正当利益"要件研究

行贿罪中的"谋取不正当利益"包括非法利益和采取非法手段获取的不确定利益,法律、行政法规以及与法律、行政法规不相抵触的地方性法规、自治条例、单行条例等,是判断利益正当与否的法律依据.学界存在"谋取不正当利益"要件取消说和保留说的分歧,但是"谋取不正当利益"要件限制了行贿罪的成立范围,体现了刑法的谦抑性价值,有利于集中司法资源治理受贿犯罪,因而在"宽严相济"刑事政策的指导下,不宜取消"谋取不正当利益要件".     

刑事悬赏广告研究

我国法律没有关于悬赏广告的明文规定 ,理论界的研究也多针对民商事悬赏广告。我国刑事悬赏广告的法律性质应定位为职责性单独行为 ,广告人只能是司法机关 ,悬赏金的支付应区别对待。     

私募股权投资中投资人几个特殊权利在中国法下的运用

在私募股权投资中,对投资人投资收益以及投资人顺利退出影响重大的投资人权利包括优先分红权、优先购买权、优先认股权、保护性条款、反稀释、清算优先权、领售权、参售权、知情权和检查权。本文结合中国的法律实践对其中特别重要的三项特殊权利,即优先认股权、清算优先权、领售权在中国法下的合法性及可能性进行了分析。     

新《合同法》下海运合同和租船合同之订立和生效若干问题探讨

新《合同法》的颁布首次建立起较完整、科学的合同订立和生效之法律制度。海上货运合同和租船合同作为合同的一类 ,在《海商法》及其它水运法律规范未有规定的方面 ,自然适用《合同法》。因此研究《合同法》中有关合同订立和生效之法律制度 ,对认识和掌握海上货运合同的订立和生效大有裨益。     

刑事悬赏问题探析

悬赏经常出现在我们的视线之内是1999年开始的事。我国所以采取悬赏制度有其经济、文化的背景。悬赏存在着争议,但从价值取向考虑,悬赏获得了大家的认可。悬赏的法律归属于契约,是一种特殊的契约。实践部门运用悬赏应注意区别举报人的动机和保密的问题。     

论合同订立中的格式之战

在现代市场经济条件下，格式文本在合同订立过程中发挥着前所未有的作用，商人们往往无视双方格式文本内容的差异，照常进行交易，从而引发“格式之战”。为平息“格式之战”，各国基本上都经历了“镜像规则”──“最后一论规则”──“第一枪规则”──“相互击倒”的道路。我国《合同法》没有对“格式之战”问题作出规定，因而应在充分考虑合同法效益、正义的价值目标和现代合同法特征的基础上积极地进行完善。     

遗失物立法中的几点思考和建议

我国关于遗失物的立法还不够完善,导致司法实务中有关遗失物纠纷的处理无法可依。为此,应当建立和完善物权立法,对遗失物拾得人的报酬请求权,遗失物的悬赏广告,以及无人认领的遗失物归属等问题应作出明确合理的规定。