信息化视域下思政教育有效性提升的基本原则

信息化视域下,信息技术的发展与应用要求高校思想政治教育工作者在深入分析和把握高等教育对象、高等教育生态等发展变化的基础上,牢固把握高校思想政治教育的主动权和主导权,遵循高校思想政治教育活动的基本原则,不断创新高校思想政治教育理念、改进方式方法,不断提升高校思想政治教育的针对性和有效性。     

ASEAN sceptics versus ASEAN proponents: evaluating regional institutions

Since it was founded in 1967, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) has attracted both sceptics and proponents. With Southeast Asia’s economy growing rapidly and tied into all parts of the global economy and the region geopolitically important to the world’s major powers, how ASEAN manages its internal affairs and East Asian relations is crucial. The differences in how sceptics and proponents perceive ASEAN, and why they take up such contrasting positions, need to be fully appreciated as scholars and commentators review and assess ASEAN’s performance. This analysis uses three analytical criteria – effectiveness, legitimacy and efficiency – to juxtapose and evaluate the competing arguments of the two approaches so as to better understand how and why sceptics and proponents can examine the same institutions and events and reach very different conclusions.     

Writing the History of the Future: Securing Stability through Peace Agreements

Abstract

Building effective states is crucial to global stability and prosperity, but this priority has yet to be translated into a consistent approach embraced by a community of practice. Various factors have constrained the emergence of such a community, including a lack of consensus on the range of functions that states should perform. Peace agreements are implicitly exercises in statecraft but have not been systematically analysed as such. Systematic analysis of peace agreements reveals seven foci of statecraft. This analysis in turn reveals seven key building-blocks that peace agreements, as exercises in statecraft, must address in laying the foundations for a durable, inclusive political, social and economic order.     

基于多中心治理的公共政策产出机制研究

公共政策产出存在多种机制:政府主导的"内生型"、公众有限参与的政府"回应型"、多中心治理下的"网络型"等。在各民主制国家多种政策产出机制是并存的,只是由于民主政治发展程度不同,三者所占比重不等而已。在治理理论成为一种政治思潮的今天,多中心的"网络型"政策产出机制也受到越来越多的欢迎和关注。这既给传统的政策产出机制带来一系列的影响,也使得该机制的不足得以暴露,如何进一步优化这一政策产出机制成为亟待解决的问题。     

我国不起诉制约机制的探索与完善

不起诉制约机制是不起诉制度的重要内容之一,设置该机制的目的在于对检察机关行使不起诉裁量权进行有效的规范和制约。我国刑事诉讼法中对不起诉裁量权的制约已有相关规定并形成了完备的体系。但在司法实践中仍存在一些问题,这些问题可从多方面改革完善：如建立不起诉听证制度;完善检察机关内部制约机制;完善人民监督员制度。     

Leveraging South–South cooperation for Africa's development

Optimising the development opportunities presented by emerging powers' growing interest in trade, investment and diplomatic engagement in Africa seems a priority for the continent in the context of a changing global system in which power is more diffuse. Taking into account a reconceptualisation of aid effectiveness as development effectiveness, this paper focuses on the manner in which African states understand and approach new opportunities for cooperation with emerging powers, especially China, India and Brazil, including the crucial issue of whether they seek joint development initiatives with both traditional partners and emerging powers. The central argument is that South–South cooperation, which is value-neutral although rhetorically reflecting the principles of solidarity and mutual benefit, must be part of an effective strategy to draw emerging economies into the national or regional development objectives of African states and the continent at large.     

西部大开发的成效、问题及对策建议

国家实施西部大开发战略以来,西部地区经济社会各项事业发展迅速,在经济总量、基础设施建设、产业结构优化、生态环境保护等方面取得了一系列成就。但是,西部地区仍存在区域内部发展不平衡、人民生活水平仍然不高、对外开放程度较弱等问题。本文在分析和评价西部大开发战略实施成效的基础上,梳理了西部大开发战略继续实施所面临的主要问题,提出了进一步推进西部大开发的政策建议。     

论和解协议效力的司法确认

一般认为,和解与调解的分野在于有无第三方参与纠纷的解决,但事实上和解与调解是出于同一个基本原理,即当事人之间的合意。在纠纷解决的机制中,和解始终占有十分重要的地位,调解、诉讼和仲裁都是在第三方参与下解决纠纷的方式,但是其中都蕴含着和解的契机。虽然从原理上讲和解似乎只是纠纷当事人之间直接交涉的结果,但是直接赋予其法律上独立的地位不仅是必要的而且是可行的。     

THE NEW BEGINNINGS PROGRAM FOR DIVORCING AND SEPARATING FAMILIES: MOVING FROM EFFICACY TO EFFECTIVENESS

This article describes a program of research on effectively transporting the New Beginnings Program (NBP), a university-tested prevention program for divorced families, to community settings. The four steps in this research are described: (1) selecting a community partner, (2) developing effective methods of engaging parents, (3) redesigning the NBP to be easily delivered with high quality and fidelity in community agencies, and (4) adapting the NBP to meet the needs of the full population of divorcing families. The article concludes with a discussion of plans for an effectiveness trial to evaluate the NBP when delivered in community settings.