我国体育行政管理法治化对策研究

依法行政是实施依法治国方略成败的关键,也是我国从体育大国向体育强国迈进的关键。体育行政管理的法治化既需要体育立法与执法的完善,也需要体育普法和监督的加强。本文结合我国体育立法、执法、普法和监督的现状,分析各环节存在的问题,在此基础上提出相应的对策,以期促进我国体育行政管理法治化的深入发展。     

行业协会中强势会员的不正当行为

在行业协会内部,由于各企业在资财多寡、影响力大小等方面存有差异,因而有强势会员与中小会员之分。在利益的驱动下,强势会员可能利用自己的优势地位操纵和控制协会,侵害中小会员的利益,从而直接影响到行业协会的健康发展,因此,应当完善行业协会的内部治理结构,规范强势会员的不正当行为。     

从群众运动反腐到网络民意反腐——中国共产党反腐的路径取向回顾与现实思考

中国共产党在不同的历史时期,采取不同的路径不断加强反腐倡廉工作。从新中国成立初期的群众运动反腐到权力反腐,再到坚持综合治理,建设科学严密、完备管用的反腐倡廉制度体系,以及网络反腐的兴起,都显示出党不断更新反腐理念,改进反腐方式的决心。汲取以往党反腐倡廉建设路径取向的经验,对于我们在新时期更好地反腐败有重要的现实意义。     

人才资源开发利用之管见

我国是人力资源大国,但又是人才匮乏尤其是高级人才匮乏的大国.只有将我圆的人力资源优势最大程度地转变为人才优势,实施人才强国战略,我们的国家、民族才能在日益激烈的国际竞争中立于不败之地.而提高人才管理队伍的素质,加大人才培训力度,创新人才激励方法,是人才资源开发利用之有效途径.     

The cartography of responses to state crime: understanding the linkages among state abuses/crimes/deviance/harms/illegalities/wrongs,resistance/control,and state organizational reactions

Although a considerable amount of thoughtful scholarly research on state crime has been conducted and published, researchers have failed to assemble a comprehensive model of the process and reactions that begin after state crime has occurred and been detected. This article outlines a heuristic model that presents the major political actors that participate in this process and the relationships that can develop among them. In order to create the model, research that has been conducted on state crime is reviewed and integrated, difficulties with this work are analyzed, and recommendations about future research that can be conducted using the model are made.     

化解冲突：和谐社会的德育之道

和谐社会的德育建设既要注重普遍性又要关注特殊性，既要重视共同性又要分清差异性。德育之道有三重含义：作为德育本质与动力的道；作为德育制度建设的道；作为德育方法与途径的道。区别于传统的农业社会和工业社会，和谐社会的德育之道具有其鲜明的时代特征，化解冲突是其核心思想，深刻认识这一点对化解不同利益集团之间的矛盾纠纷，深化学校德育改革，推动和谐社会的精神文明建设具有重要的意义。     

人民监督员制度的定位——从法律监督分类的角度

人民监督员制度是实践中的新生事物。从法律监督分类的角度,应当对人民监督员制度做出如下定位:一是人民监督员制度是对人民检察院自侦案件进行的外部监督;二是人民监督员制度是一种权力监督;三是人民监督员制度是人民监督员对人民检察院自侦案件进行的事后监督。     

A Strategic Prospect that Can Be Realized

正The Chinese Dream in Full Swing Speech Extracts from the International Dialogue on the Chinese Dream ForumTHE Chinese Dream encompasses four main visions:a renewed,powerful China;a civilized China governed by equality and fairness;a harmonious China in which all social strata coexist peacefully;and a beautiful China with a clean environment.Despite China’s well-known difficulties–pollution,corruption,and economic inequality–China     

Neoconservatism,US–China conflict,and Australia's ‘great and powerful friends’ dilemma

Abstract

Following its time-honoured ‘great and powerful friends’ foreign policy tradition, Australia has been cultivating close ties simultaneously with the United States and China. Yet, as a rivalry between the two powers apparently looms large, Australia faces an acute dilemma. While the rise of China and the question of Taiwan are often cited as main causes of US–China discord, this article argues that the American neoconservative policy on China, underpinned by a belief in both military strength and moral clarity, is integral to this growing competition and is, by extension, partly responsible for the emergence of Australia's predicament. To avoid such a difficult choice, the article suggests that Australia should strive to curb the policy influence of neoconservatism both in the United States and at home by pursuing a more independent foreign policy, making clear its strategic postures on US–China relations, and helping establish a trilateral strategic forum between Australia, the United States, and China.     

Repositioning the corporate criminal: comparing and contrasting corporate criminal liability in Canada and Finland

ABSTRACT

Over the past two decades, a number of states in the Global North have introduced laws aimed at holding corporations criminally liable. While there is an important literature examining these legal regimes there is a paucity of comparative work interrogating the different political struggles and processes leading to corporate criminal liability (CCL) legislation. This paper addresses this lacuna by comparing and contrasting the development of CCL in Canada and Finland. By scrutinizing the law reform processes in each jurisdiction, the paper documents how CCL emerged under different conjunctures in each country, yet were shaped similarly by hegemonic beliefs in the non-criminal status of corporation, the importance of advancing private enterprise and established jurisprudence. Of particular note are the ways in which dominant notions of legal individualism and the universal legal subject constrained legislative efforts to hold corporations criminally to account therein preventing corporate misconduct from being processed as “real” crimes.