股东派生诉讼的法理探析

股东派生诉讼已被我国司法实践所接受 ,但我国公司法及相关法律几乎没有涉及到股东派生诉讼 ,这给司法实践带来困惑。而西方公司法及其理论相当成熟 ,在修改公司法或作出司法解释时应当借鉴这些理论及做法。因此从法理上探寻股东派生诉权的源由 ,梳理派生诉讼的股东主体资格条件 ,明确提起派生诉讼的前置程序 ,厘定被告主体及其侵害行为的范围 ,对于司法实践和完善立法都有现实意义     

对我国先予执行制度立法定位的思考

先予执行的功能是对民事诉讼起保障作用,其保障具体包含了对当事人合法权益的"及时"保护和"有效"保护两方面的内容。但现行先予执行的立法仅体现了对当事人的"及时"保护,缺失对当事人"有效"保护的规定。先予执行立法定位的偏颇和制度设计的不合理,不仅使当事人合法权益得不到充分的保障,也使先予执行制度在我国目前的司法实务中很少得到施行,欲解决先予执行的现存问题,仅进行制度性的修补无济于事,必须基于对当事人合法权益的"有效"保护和对当事人合法权益的"及时"保护,对先予执行制度进行重新立法定位,将先予执行界定为是使债权人的权利得到早日实现、是对未生效的判决赋予执行力。     

论行政诉讼中先予执行制度的几个问题

先予执行,是指人民法院在判决确定之前裁定由给付义务的人,预先给对方部分财物,或者为一定行为的法律制度。先予执行在行政诉讼中并未引起应有重视,也没有发挥出其应有的价值。从行政诉讼角度重新审视先予执行制度,会发现有一些问题存在,尚需完善,尤其是先予执行的行为,尽管有很强的实践意义,但实施起来却困难重重。     

The influence of police interventions and alternative income sources on the dynamic process of choosing crime as a career

This paper demonstrates how a rational process of choice may be influenced by both deterrence forces and economic opportunities. This choice is modeled by a dynamic (Markov) process which captures self-sorting by youth among the categories of innocents, desisters, and persisters. in crime. A key to the results is the introduction of the perceived probability of punishment and its influence on the sorting process. The analysis shows how this force and the availability, or lack of, economic opportunities or income sources modify transition probabilities. The long-run consequences will be a larger subpopulation of individuals who have experimented with crime but subsequently revert to crime-free behavior and a smaller subpopulation of individuals who commit a greater share of crime. Empirical evidence is based on data from the New Youth Cohort of the National Longitudinal Surveys.     

商标法调整域名争议的实证分析

域名注册与在先商标的争议,司法实践先于法律,司法判例尽管并不一致,但均对驰名商标以特别保护,其保护均体现出商标法上保护的痕迹。但并非所有的商标都享有同等的保护,原因在于商标侵权理论的“误认”标准。《商标法》天然适用于域名侵权争议的本质———商业领域扩展的必然结果。《商标法》调整域名侵权争议的范围是有限的。     

The influence of contextual information regarding the breakdown of relationships and perpetrator-target sex composition on perceptions of relational stalking

ABSTRACT

The present study examines the influence of prior relationship (with contextual information regarding the breakdown of the relationship) and perpetrator-target sex composition on perceptions of relational stalking. The study employed an experimental 7?×?2 independent measures design, and the sample comprised 1,260 members of the community residing in Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States. Participants received one of 14 versions of a hypothetical scenario and responded to scale items concerning the situation described. The situation was perceived to be most serious when the perpetrator was a stranger or a physically violent ex-partner and least serious when the perpetrator was an ex-partner of an unfaithful target. Scenarios involving a male perpetrator and a female victim were also perceived to be more serious than scenarios involving a female perpetrator and a male target. It is apparent therefore that the context of the relationship breakdown and the sex of the perpetrator and target significantly influence perceptions of relational stalking.     

规范与控制行政契约优益权

行政契约是市场经济理念向公共领域渗透的结果,是一种富有弹性的政府管理手段。为了保障一方当事人的合法权益和防止权力滥用,对行政契约优益权的规范与控制应作为配套措施与其使用同步进行。     

China and Venezuela,a True Modeland Example of Mutual Respect

正THE history of diplomatic relations between the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela and the People’s Republic of China is divided into three stages.The first,the formal establishment of relations between the two countries,was in 1974,and purely formal,even reticent,perhaps due to heavy dependence on the governments of Western powers prior to the Bolivarian Revolution.This period ended in 1999,with the rise to power of Supreme Commander Hugo Chavez,who from the beginning had the objective of strengthening ties between the two countries and achieving more and more optimal levels.     

预售商品房买受人期待权的民法保护

商品房预售是房地产开发的一种主要筹资方式。商品房预售合同签订后,作为买卖标的物的商品房尚未建成,买受人仅取得预售商品房所有权的期待权。尽管物权法和债权法有些概括性规定对预售商品房期待权的保护起了一定作用,但远不能最大限度地保护买受人所享有的期待利益。完善我国民事立法的相关规定,有助于从根本上维护预售商品房买受人的期待权,实现买受人最终获得商品房所有权的目的。     

承租人优先购买权法律性质之探讨

法律性质不同,导致执法结果有所不同,因而法律价值的取向,社会效益的偏颇必有不同.我国目前对于优先购买权的规定较为疏漏因立法不清、学说不同,导致执法混乱,在优先购买权的问题上存在众多严重的分歧,影响了法律价值的实现,因此有必要对优先购买权性质进行分析,性质明确则对法律精神的充分实现起到积极的推动作用,通过对大陆法系优先购买权当前争论较为激烈的几种学说例如形成权说、请求权说、期待权亦或即得权说进行讨论,对于尊重既有秩序、最大程度实现社会效益以及合理保护弱势群体等有积极重要的意义.