劳权本位:劳动法律体系构建的基点和核心--兼论劳动法律体系的几个基本理论问题

劳动法律体系的建构,应以劳权本位作为理论出发点,应以劳权的实现和保障为其基点和核心.本文所提出的劳权概念,是指法律所规定或认可的劳动者在履行劳动义务的同时所应享有的与劳动有关的权益.劳权即劳工权益应是劳动法律的基本范畴和劳动立法起始概念.本文提出和论证了劳动者的概念和法律特征,认为市场经济下的劳动关系中的劳动者应为受雇于他人的以工资收入为基本生活来源的直接生产者.本文还提出了劳权关系的概念,认为劳权关系是劳动法律关系的本质体现,这一关系是相对于产权关系和经营权关系而言的,现代企业制度的经济权利结构是由产权、经营权和劳权的三权关系所构成的.     

民事公诉制度质疑

近来不少学者主张在我国应尽快建立民事公诉制度,赋予检察机关在一定范围内的民事起诉权,而从保护社会公益、解决群众性纠纷、保护弱者和加强法律监督四个方面分析,民事公诉制度在理论上存在着误区和在实际运作上可能陷入困境.其不具有存在的合理性、合法性和必要性,解决相关问题应加大行政执法力度,加强检察监督,赋予检察机关民事诉讼参诉权.     

切实加强严格执法工作,确保严打整治斗争实效

坚决执行党中央作出的2001年4月开始在全国范围内开展严打整治斗争的重大决策.要实现这一战略目标,关键要看在严打整治斗争中能不能做到严格公正执法,能不能严格按照法定程序和法定时限办案,切实提高侦查破案、调查取证和审讯等环节上的执法水平,确保办案质量,依法从重、从快和稳、准、狠地严厉打击各类违法犯罪分子.     

重温形式理性法律的特质——韦伯视野及当代价值

韦伯认为直至现代资本主义阶段,形式合理性法律开始形成并成为最具合理性的法律形态。韦伯视野中的形式理性法律具有权威性、确定性、平等性、自治性、专业性、合法性等特质。总结、重温和厉行这些形式理性法律特质,对于我国当下经济建设和法治建设都具有重要的启发价值。     

THE PRIVATIZATION OF VIOLENCE*

Norbert Elias's (1939) work on “the civilizing process” highlighted the long‐term decline in violence within Western societies. A substantial amount of more recent anthropological and historical evidence suggests that violence has evolved not just quantitatively but qualitatively as well. In particular, the social characteristics of the parties to violence have changed over time. Drawing on Donald Black's (1976, 1993a) theoretical ideas on conflict management, the present paper proposes that as intimate social ties weakened and the state strengthened, collective and nonintimate forms of (nonpolitical) violence declined significantly. Consequently, violence increasingly became less public, more private. Pockets of residual public violence can, however, still be found within modern state societies. Privatization varies, then, across time and social space.     

文物的私法问题研究——以文物保护为视角

文物作为一种稀缺的文化资源,面临着严重的危机。应对文物危机需要采取公法调控方式和私法调控方式,其中私法调控发挥着重要的作用。在文物保护视角下,文物私法关系的法律调整需要在遵守普通私法规范的基础上去契合"保护文物"这一最终目标的实现,因而文物保护在私法调整上呈现出一些自身特点,表现为对文物的私法规制主要通过对文物所有权的法律构造作出特殊的安排来实现。     

How Chinese enterprises live in freedom, competition under the rule of law

China has thoroughly amended its corporate law and hastens to formulate an anti-monopoly law. To rebound then deny the planned economy once adopted, China firmly practices marketization reform. However, common-recognized rules haven’t taken shape without sufficient gaming and, lots of quick introduced legislations are only superficial provisions. As the trend of corporate legal system in developed countries, freedom and responsibility are the two contraries but not contradictory directions during the recent reform of China’s corporate law. One is deregulation, e.g., introducing one-person company and the transition from approval system to registration system for the establishment of a company; while the other is adding various provisions of responsibility and liability to the Company Law for controlling shareholders, actual controllers, directors, supervisors and top managers. The Anti-Unfair Competition Law of China not only prescribes unfair competition but also counters monopoly. In general, it mainly focuses on anti-monopoly provisions, to popularize the concept and value of free market, making systematic regulations on any kinds of monopoly. This article reviews its background, process, meaning as well as the problems encountered. As there remains somewhat a mystery that China rapidly develops, it may also reflect a fringe of the reason. Prepared for presentation at the Global Fellows Forum, the Hauser Global Law School Program, New York University School of Law, 25 October 2006. The author is a global research fellow of the Hauser Global Law School Program, NYU School of Law. He is grateful to Jerome Cohen, Eleanor Fox and William Allen for most helpful comments, to J. H. H. Weiler for aborative presiding, and to Hua Xiao, Justin Fong, Alex Wang and Han Han for English language assistance.     

Responding to my interlocutors: a subject in the making...

In this response to Ronnie Lippens’ and Erik Claes’ critiques of a paper entitled ‘The Lore of Criminal accusation,’ Pavlich notes the ways in which his work might be compared to, yet differentiated from, abolitionist approaches to crime. Working through Lippens’ comments, he notes a possible way to understand the analysis and politics of crime (through accusation). Pavlich challenges Claes’ optimistic hypostatization of ‘criminal law’, idiosyncratic understandings of deconstruction and refocuses attention on the centrality of accusation to creating criminal subjects.     

构建和谐执法环境与提升警察管理水平的思考

构建和谐社会,要求警察管理者能够把握管理学科的系统框架,深入了解现有警察管理法律法规,注重管理者与被管理者素质的共同提升,不断推动管理创新。构建和谐执法环境是社会建设与发展的客观要求,提升警察管理水平是构建和谐执法环境的必要条件,通过实现优化警察执法环境和提升警察管理水平,将有效促进实现构建和谐社会的最终目标。     

日本诉因制度论略

诉因制度是日本刑事诉讼法借鉴大陆法系职权主义诉讼程序和英美法系对抗主义诉讼程序的一项独创.主要探讨诉因的基本涵义、诉因与相关范畴的关系、诉因在日本刑事诉讼中的运行规则、诉因的主要功能及其对我国刑事诉讼的借鉴意义.在刑事诉讼中,诉因可以协调控诉方、裁判方和辩护方在刑事诉讼中的相互关系,不但有利于制约公诉机关的起诉变更权,而且有利于防止司法权滥用和保障辩护权的有效行使.在当前我国刑事诉讼程序由职权主义向对抗主义转变的过程中,借鉴日本的诉因制度有利于克服我国刑事司法实践中的某些缺陷和弊端.