略论刑事诉讼中的“一事不再理”

在刑事诉讼中,一事不再理指的是法院对于任何已经生效裁判加以处理的案件不得再行审判;对于所有已被生效裁判确定为有罪式无罪的被告人,法院不得再予审判或科刑.是刑事诉讼法遵循人道主义原则,刑事诉讼程序人性化的体现,其本着维护法律的稳定性和权威性,避免司法资源的浪费,保障被告人的合法权益,已成为现代刑事诉讼不可缺少的一项重要原则.     

论物权的排他效力与优先效力

物权排他效力与物权优先效力是各自独立的两种物权效力。物权排他效力是同一标的物上已成立的物权排斥同一内容的物权再行成立的效力 ,物权优先效力是指物权优先于债权的效力。     

新闻犯罪的预防与抗制

新闻犯罪是伴随信息社会的到来所必然出现的社会问题,它的产生是由新闻工作者新闻法制观念的淡薄、新闻媒介和新闻记者地位的错位、正确价值观念的沦丧三方面所致.新闻犯罪具有主体特征、主观特征、客体特征及客观特征,打击并有效控制此类犯罪的必要途径是完善刑事立法、发挥刑法威慑作用并辅以法律、职业道德培训.     

Postmortem changes in resistivity of the anterior abdominal wall during the early postmortem period in rats

An accurate and reproducible technique was employed for the determination of the resistivity of excised portions of the anterior abdominal wall of rats. Resistivity decreased linearly (r = −0.93; P < 0.001) from 1438 ± 131 Ω · cm, immediately following death, to 360 ± 144 Ω · cm at a postmortem interval of 36 h. These changes are believed to reflect the morphological and/or chemical changes which occur at the cellular level during the early postmortem period.     

中国警政近代化过程中的文化阻力--兼论落后教育的影响

作为宪政运动组成部分的中国警察近代化是以移植西方警察制度为基本路径的,但近代中国等级特权观念依旧牢固,个人主义依然发达,"官本位"观念仍极浓厚,教育水平也很落后,国民文化素质普遍不高,致使曾成为社会进步表征的中国近代警察很难有所作为.     

Ambiguous activists. Estonia's model of cultural autonomy as interpreted by two of its founders: Werner Hasselblatt and Ewald Ammende

Abstract

Baltic Germans who were active on behalf of especially German minorities throughout Europe during the 1920s have already found some recognition in especially German-language studies. Now they are receiving a wider coverage. Two of these men, Werner Hasselblatt and Ewald Ammende, came from Estonia and played a part in the development of the cultural autonomy legislation enacted in 1925. Traditionally this has been counted a positive contribution to the management of Europe's minorities during the inter-war period. During the 1930s at the latest, however, both Hasselblatt and Ammende drifted towards German National Socialism. Through an investigation of the ideas of these men, this paper attempts to interpret lives which helped to create apparently progressive legislation in the 1920s, but which compromised with a dreadful political movement soon afterwards. What were the motives behind their actions?     

Pleasures of Late Socialism in Soviet Lithuania: Strategies of Resistance and Dissent

This paper deals with popular perceptions of Soviet ideology during the period of Late Socialism. On the premises of colonial theory, mass communication and pop culture studies, the author argues that even totalitarian ideologies are subject to active consumption, excorporation and interpolation. While the official Soviet media provided a rather stable picture of the Soviet citizen, loyal to the Soviet authorities and the Soviet ideals, this paper reveals, on the basis of multiple interviews, how ideology operates at the level of everyday life and popular consciousness.     

The influence of prisons on inmate misconduct: A multilevel investigation

This article presents the results of multilevel analyses of prisoners' misconduct for the population of over 120,000 federal prisoners incarcerated in June 2001. Prior research has focused on individual-level explanations of inmate misconduct, but this study explicitly examines whether prisons vary in their influence on such misconduct. The study demonstrates that model specification makes a difference in our understanding of which variables are related to misconduct, that the type of misconduct is important for understanding the effects of covariates of misconduct, and that results of multilevel models can easily be used to compare the performance of prisons.     

关于社会科学中量化研究的深层思考

在量化研究中,研究者通常从特定的研究假设出发,通过对抽象概念的操作化定义确定变量,并运用问卷、量表、结构式访谈与观察等方法收集资料,然后进行统计分析来检验研究假设。本文旨在探讨量化研究的本体论前提,并从认识论和方法论视角分析量化研究中的可靠性和有效性问题。     

诱惑性行政调查的合法性界限问题:从相关诱惑性侦查之实践说起

"诱惑性行政调查"是行政法学为描述"钓鱼执法"类行为而构造出的一个符合基础术语特征的概念。诱惑性行政调查作为最有可能被滥用的行政活动之一,理应对其加以防御。但诱惑性行政调查在某些情况下确实可以弥补常规调查手段的不足,故其具有一定的现实合理性。综合衡量之,在一定限度内使用这种调查手段应当被"允许与认同"。并且诱惑性行政调查与诱惑侦查在法律原理上是相通的,借鉴有代表性的美日两国的诱惑侦查理论,对于认识诱惑性行政调查的合法性界限大有裨益。可以说,美日两国的诱惑性侦查之合法性判定基准都糅合了主观标准与客观标准。应该先以"主观标准"审查被调查人的主观意图,再以"客观标准"审查执法人员的行为限度的方法来框定我国诱惑性行政调查的合法性界限。进而,诱惑性行政调查的适用范围应该限于常规行政调查手段难以实现行政目标并且危害性较大的案件,诱惑性行政调查的适用类型也仅限于"机会提供型"。