论警务公开的完善

警务公开是公安机关及人民警察在行使警察权的过程中,通过一定形式,依法向社会公众传播或发布协调、处理警察关系的各种相关信息,对确保公正执法具有重大意义。当前,我国警务公开尚存在若干问题和不足,关键是未将警务公开置于政府信息公开的大背景下考虑。为此,应宏观把握,战略思考,从进一步改革创新公安机关的保密制度,处理好公安机关与新闻媒体的关系,完善相关法律规定等方面予以完善。     

恢复性司法的中国命运

恢复性司法的正当性及在尊重受害人,促进犯罪人认罪悔罪、改过自新等方面的优势具有普适性价值.中国传统文化、现实条件等也有其适宜的土壤,因此恢复性司法在中国进行建构具有可行性,但是应当从中国现有司法实践出发,并在与中国国情不断融合中积极稳妥地推进.     

从恢复性司法论我国“和解制度的刑事化”

“恢复性司法”是西方国家的一项刑事司法制度,它的价值在于通过犯罪人、被害人及其他主体之间积极主动的沟通和交流,让犯罪人有机会通过积极的、负责任的行为尽快改过自新、融入社会,同时使得被害人因犯罪所造成的物质、精神损失得到有效的补偿,使被害人受犯罪影响的生活能够尽快地恢复常态,最大限度地保护被害人的合法权益。我国应借鉴其合理之处,构建我国的刑事和解制度。     

我国区域警务合作机制构建

现在我国的区域警务合作机制不论是在实施的效率、增加合作机会和层次以及警务资源的共享等方面还存在着很多的问题,这就要求我们要从建立新型的合作模式、更新现有的合作手段、转变原有的合作观念等方面努力完善我国的区域警务合作机制,只有这样才能进一步提高我国区域警务合作的工作效率、放大其实际效果,从而实现区域警务合作有效促进系统内部交流合作,控制社会面的目标。     

Procedural justice,obligation to obey,and cooperation with police in a sample of Jamaican citizens

ABSTRACT

Procedural justice theory plays a central role in understanding police–citizen relationships. To test the universality of procedural justice theory, researchers have tended to assess the relative impacts of normative and instrumental models of policing in different geopolitical contexts. Building on Reisig and Lloyd’s study in Jamaica, we test in the current study the relative impacts of procedural justice (a normative factor) and police effectiveness and risk of sanctioning (instrumental factors) on Jamaicans’ obligation to obey the police and willingness to cooperate with police. We found that procedural justice predicted both obligation to obey and cooperation, although obligation did not predict cooperation. And while effectiveness predicted obligation, it was not significantly related to cooperation. Lastly, older citizens were more willing to cooperate with police. The study’s implications for policy and future research are discussed.     

公安评价运行中存在的问题及其解决途径

伴随着我国行政体制改革的不断深入和政府职能的重塑。公共部门的工作评价也逐渐成为政府部门工作的重要组成部分，在实践中对于促进政府职能转变、提高行政效率效果显著。作为政府职能部门的公安机关也开始探索公安工作评价的新思路和新方法．以期通过评价来促进工作的改进和效能的提高。公安评价在运行中面临着来自主观和客观两方面的障碍，公安机关应该从加强公安评价规范化建设、建立公安评价信息系统、引入公众参与机制等方面入手，保证最大限度地发挥公安评价的作用。实现既定的目标。     

恢复性司法的核心价值：尊重和修复

恢复性司法的核心价值是尊重和修复。通过经验角度的分析，恢复性司法的内在价值体现在尊重被害人的主体地位、尊重被害人的内心需要和促使加害人回归社会。恢复性司法建构了一种新型模式，有助于多元主体的参与和社会秩序的修复。恢复性司法程序尊重当事人的自由意志、修复了当事人之间的矛盾冲突。     

恢复性司法程序之思考

本文对恢复性司法程序的内容、制度基础以及历史渊源进行考察,并对恢复性司法程序的利弊加以分析,最后论述在我国构建恢复性司法程序的障碍及有利因素的基础上,提出了构建该程序的初步设想。     

谈恢复性司法之利弊

恢复性司法是以对被害人的赔偿为前提,以对犯罪人的悔罪基础,以对被破坏的社会关系的修复为目的对传统的报复性司法进行检讨的基础上衍生出来的一种替代性刑事案件解决机制。笔者从中国国情从发,重点对恢复性司法之利弊关系进行粗浅的探讨。     

Apartheid Policing: examining the US migrant labour system through a South African Lens

This article draws a parallel between the Apartheid regime in South Africa and the post-IRCA immigration regime in the USA. I argue that both regimes were organised around Apartheid Policing, which may be defined as a legal process consisting of three mutually reinforcing mechanisms: differentiation of migrants into non-citizen insiders with legal residence rights and non-citizen outsiders without them; stabilisation of migrants as permanent or long-term residents, enabling the growth of the migrant workforce; and marginalisation of migrants as politically vulnerable outsiders, including exploitation at work. But the two regimes were supported by different political and ideological apparatuses. While placing a disproportionate burden on Latino migrants, the post-IRCA immigration regime differed from the Apartheid regime in that it was not organised around an explicit racial hierarchy, and offered non-citizens a greater array of rights. As a result, Apartheid Policing under the post-IRCA immigration regime is potentially more politically sustainable.