创建学习型企业--知识经济时代企业制胜的法宝

"学习型企业"是未来成功的模式.构建学习型企业首先要有正确的学习理念;同时要加强企业文化建设,不断提升组织的竞争力;不断提高企业技术创新能力,适应市场经济发展的需要;深化职工教育改革,建立现代企业教育制度.     

论森林公安“刑事科学技术”学科体系建设

从对建设森林公安"刑事技术"学科的必要性、不可替代性和可行性的角度,论述了森林公安"刑事技术"学科的内涵及其具体课程设置,并提出应根据森林公安工作的实际需要,打破课程原有系统,使相近的课程相互渗透交叉,组成知识群或技能群进行教学,以突出公安学科的应用型特色.     

Closing the Floodgates on Privacy Class Actions: Lloyd v Google LLC

In Lloyd v Google LLC [2021] UKSC 50, the Supreme Court overturned the Court of Appeal's decision, which had allowed a claim under the Data Protection Act 1998 to proceed as a representative action under CPR 19.6. This is significant because the Court of Appeal's decision arguably paved the way for further data protection/privacy claims to be brought as opt-out ‘class actions’ using this procedure. This case note summarises the Supreme Court decision and assesses its implications for both the procedural law of collective redress and the substantive law of privacy in England. It argues that the Supreme Court's reasoning in relation to both of these areas is sound as a matter of precedent and statutory construction. As a matter of public policy, the decision is likely to re-enliven debate about the availability of collective redress in English law and whether the existing collective proceedings regime should be broadened.     

正则表达式在考试系统静态分析中的应用

文章简要介绍了正则表达式及其四大功能：检验、提取、分割、替换,介绍了正则表达式在考试系统中的应用,结合实际给出了正则表达式的应用实例。     

工程训练网上考试系统的设计与实现

随着不同学科与信息技术的不断整合发展,网上考试将是考试方式改革的重要方向。从学校教育的实际出发,引入基于.net三层架构的“工程训练网上考试系统”,可实现考生管理、网上考试、试题管理、成绩管理、随机组卷和系统维护等功能,并为工程训练考试的科学化、规范化,提高学生的知识水平提供有益的尝试。     

论公安院校心理学与心理测试技术的教学衔接

随着犯罪心理测试教学在公安院校的开展,公安院校学生心理学基础的薄弱对教学所带来的负面影响越来越明显。研究发现,目前我国公安院校心理学教育不论在教学体系,还是在教学方法上都存在一定的问题。这些问题不仅导致学生在研究犯罪心理测试时力不从心,而且不利于他们在将来的工作中迅速适应环境,解决这些问题,必须改革公安院校心理学教育的教学体系和教学方法。具体来说,在教学体系改革中,要着重增加“警察心理”与“社会心理学”等内容,在教学方法改革中,要强化案例教学研究,尝试研究性学习,加强操作性训练。     

透过法医痕迹分析犯罪嫌疑人心理在命案侦破中的运用

法医痕迹是指在命案现场中反映在尸体上的痕迹和血迹等生物检材分布情况,在命案现场分析中,根据法医痕迹分析案件是介于法医、痕迹与侦查之间的一个桥梁,是新世纪法医工作与痕迹工作的延伸,把法医学与痕迹学结合起来,运用犯罪分子遗留在现场特别是尸体上的心理痕迹,对于提高命案现场分析的深度和广度、拓宽法医学和痕迹学的研究范围都具有积极而深远的意义。     

浅谈刑事技术与刑事侦查的协作

刑事技术与刑事侦查的关系是相互包容和密不可分的。侦技协作的基本内容包括人的结合、知识的结合和手段的配合。目前分局侦技协作的主要不足表现在:缺少协作意识;缺少现场意识;缺少沟通意识。所以,公安机关应多措施促进侦技协作。     

No Sheriff in Town: Governance for Online Dispute Resolution

Online dispute resolution (ODR), the practice of resolving disputes via the Internet or digital applications, has been developing since the mid‐1990s. As the field has grown and gained traction, it has increasingly received attention from professional associations and industry leaders in the world of alternative dispute resolution (ADR). More recently, it has begun to receive recognition from sources outside of this field — in both the public and private sectors. As the field develops and individual initiatives become widely adopted, the attention it receives from external sources will undoubtedly focus on questions of quality, ethics, practitioner training, service provider qualifications, and monitoring. These questions — already beginning to be heard from within the field — derive, in essence, from one shared overall question, that of appropriate governance for the ODR field. In this article, we will explain what we mean when we discuss a field's governance and suggest that the field itself should investigate issues of its own governance. We explore and explain the current “low‐to‐no” state of governance in ODR — and the developments that are likely, should the field fail to actively address this issue. We discuss the costs of no governance, and the potential costs and disadvantages of employing a higher‐governance model. We ask whether ODR can, indeed, be governed at all, and illustrate why addressing ODR governance is a very complex venture, in terms of the web of factors to be addressed, no matter how beneficial internal governance may be. We do not, in this article, intend to decide any of these questions — but, rather, to pose them to the ODR field and to the wider fields of ADR and conflict management. We point out why the ODR field is at a developmental point that is highly suitable for discussing and deciding these questions — and why these decisions might have far‐reaching implications for a wide range of conflict‐related fields.     

RISK,RACE, AND RECIDIVISM: PREDICTIVE BIAS AND DISPARATE IMPACT*

One way to unwind mass incarceration without compromising public safety is to use risk assessment instruments in sentencing and corrections. Although these instruments figure prominently in current reforms, critics argue that benefits in crime control will be offset by an adverse effect on racial minorities. Based on a sample of 34,794 federal offenders, we examine the relationships among race, risk assessment [the Post Conviction Risk Assessment (PCRA)], and future arrest. First, application of well‐established principles of psychological science revealed little evidence of test bias for the PCRA—the instrument strongly predicts arrest for both Black and White offenders, and a given score has essentially the same meaning—that is, the same probability of recidivism—across groups. Second, Black offenders obtain higher average PCRA scores than do White offenders (d = .34; 13.5 percent nonoverlap in groups’ scores), so some applications could create disparate impact. Third, most (66 percent) of the racial difference in PCRA scores is attributable to criminal history—which is already embedded in sentencing guidelines. Finally, criminal history is not a proxy for race, but instead it mediates the relationship between race and future arrest. Data are more helpful than rhetoric if the goal is to improve practice at this opportune moment in history.