试论“命案必破”防误体系的构建

有些人误认为公安部提出“命案必破”就是强调破案率，就是承诺100％的破案，就是宁可错究也不可错放，结果急功近利、造成冤假错案，从而对“命案必破”提出了质疑和否定。究其原因，主要是对“命案必破”理解把握不准所致，只有正确把握和应用好“命案必破”这把“双刃剑”，才能发挥和挖掘其应有的最大价值。     

理解他人：道德教育的哲学视域

理解他人既是发展人际关系的基本前提,也是道德教育的基本目标之一,尤其是在物质主义和个人主义盛行的社会转型期,人与人之间的疏离、冷漠、紧张甚至冲突的现象愈加严重,彰显理解他人的道德意义更加必要。笔者对理解他人的必要性;理解他人的可能性和如何理解他人三个问题进行了哲学思考,并在理解他人与自我价值的实现之间建立起内在的统一关系。     

如何认识当代资本主义的新变化

能否用科学的态度去认识当代资本主义的新变化,意义重大。对此必须把握住以下几方面:第一,不承认,不正视资本主义的新变化,是不行的;第二,把当代资本主义的新变化说成是资本主义在性质上的根本改变,是有害的;第三,关键在于要从实际影响中去把握当代资本主义的新变化。     

数额犯中数额认识错误的评判

在我国违法和犯罪分开的二元立法背景下,必然使犯罪概念蕴含着罪量要素,刑法理论和司法实践当中的数额犯、情节犯等概念亦成为绕不开的重要话题,故此数额犯便成为了我国刑法理论上所特有的犯罪形态.因此,有必要对数额犯中数额认识错误的问题进行系统讨论,并提出相应的评判标准,以期能更好的解决司法实践中所遇到的难题.从数额犯所涉及的数额的概念入手,明确数额在数额犯中乃至我国刑法中的定位问题是研究数额认识错误评判的前提,由于数额认定是司法实践中定罪量刑的重要因素,但由于数额在刑事案件中看似具体但又包含着抽象的成分,所以既需要对其进行量的判断,又需要相应的价值判断.有了对数额认识错误的法理评判,就能结合刑法条文以及相关司法解释,对具体案件中行为人的数额认识错误问题作出正确的诠释.     

TOWARD THE DIFFERENTIATION OF HIGH‐CONFLICT FAMILIES: AN ANALYSIS OF SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH AND CANADIAN CASE LAW

Social science research and the courts have begun to recognize the special challenges posed by “high‐conflict” separations for children and the justice system. The use of “high conflict” terminology by social science researchers and the courts has increased dramatically over the past decade. This is an important development, but the term is often used vaguely and to characterize very different types of cases. An analysis of Canadian case law reveals that some judges are starting to differentiate between various degrees and types of high conflict. Often this judicial differentiation is implicit and occurs without full articulation of the factors that are taken into account in applying different remedies. There is a need for the development of more refined, explicit analytical concepts for the identification and differentiation of various types of high conflict cases. Empirically driven social science research can assist mental health professionals, lawyers and the courts in better understanding these cases and providing the most appropriate interventions. As a tentative scheme for differentiating cases, we propose distinguishing between high conflict cases where there is: (1) poor communication; (2) domestic violence; and (3) alienation. Further, there must be a differentiation between cases where one parent is a primary instigator for the conflict or abuse, and those where both parents bear significant responsibility.     

浅议当代工人阶级的新变化

改革开放以来,我国当代工人阶级发生了许多新的变化,具有新的时代特征。不论工人阶级发生了什么样的变化,工人阶级仍然是我国的领导阶级;工人阶级仍然是先进生产力的杰出代表;工人阶级仍然是建设中国特色社会主义事业的主力军。     

正确理解党的制度建设科学化

十八大沿用了十七大“五位一体”的党建格局,并把制度建设放在最后,要求把制度建设贯穿在思想建设、组织建设、作风建设和反腐倡廉建设中。当前,党建科学化的研究中,出现了一些理解上的误区,其中对制度建设科学化的误解最多,出现了制度万能论的论调,造成实践中的困难。     

Procedural goods in a democracy: How one is treated versus what one gets

There are four classes of procedural goods, each of which is an appropriate ground for answering the question: “Is this a fair procedure?” (i) It is unfair not to treat a person with dignity; the dignity goods are self-respect, personal control, and an understanding of the procedures that determine relevant outcomes. (ii) It is unfair to impose upon a person heavy (net) costs, such as overburdened cognitive capacities and high information costs, excessively painful interpersonal conflict, threats beyond those inherent in the situation, and humiliation. (iii) It is unfair to disregard (but not necessarily to violate) the person's own sense of justice, the codes of honor and practice of his own group and culture. And, of course, (iv) it is unfair to use a procedure that does not have the highest probability of achieving distributive or retributive justice. Few of the standard articles of democratic theory (e.g., liberty, equal treatment before the law, rights, and sharing of power) offer sufficient protections for the first three of these procedural goods.     

解释学方法论与现代西方心理学

纵观西方心理学百年发展史,解释学对现代西方心理学尤其对理解心理学和精神分析学有着巨大的影响,特别是对现代西方心理学具有方法论的指导意义,主要体现在：以“文本”为对象,以理解和解释为方法,重视整体性和历史制约性原则等四个方面。解释学方法论作为西方心理学方法论的“第三势力”,支持了人文科学倾向的心理学的发展,但同时它自身又具有浓厚的主观主义和非理性主义的色彩     

由"淫秽性"谈规范构成要件要素认定的实体及程序路径

"淫秽性"属于规范的构成要件要素,规范的构成要件要素是故意的认识因素.欠缺"淫秽性"认识的认识错误属于事实错误,阻却故意,不构成淫秽物品犯罪.应该在将淫秽物品犯罪的法定最高刑大为降低的前提下,将欠缺"淫秽性"认识的证明责任分配给被告承担.