论信用行政评价的属性及其司法控制——一种后果取向的分析视角

信用行政评价是信用行政惩戒制度中的关键环节,其合法性对后续惩戒措施的合法性具有决定作用。关于其行为性质与可诉性,理论上存在行政处罚、行政确认、主动信息公开和行政事实行为四种认识。司法实践中,法院虽然通过严格的规范演绎推理否定了信用行政评价的行政处罚属性,但是未能就其行为性质与可诉性达成肯定而统一的认识。后果解释在信用评价案件中具有可适用性,通过澄清隐藏在司法判决中的后果考量,并以后果权衡的均衡性为标准,应当将信用评价定性为行政确认和政府主动的信息公开。在审查进路上,法院应进行独立审查和分类审查,根据不同的行为定性采取不同的审查强度,建构不同的审查标准。     

信贷扩张与资产价格泡沫：案例、机制与启示

回顾分析1929年大崩溃、1980年代末日本的资产价格泡沫以及2008年美国次贷危机,发现每次资产价格泡沫的过度膨胀都伴随着大规模的信贷扩张;而信贷急速扩张的背后,则是长期繁荣所形成的大众乐观以至疯狂情绪.这意味着,应该从更长远的政策视野推进宏观金融调控体系改革,构建金融和实体经济双稳定框架,以降低实体经济、信贷扩张与资产价格波动的同周期性所引发的泡沫风险.     

"空白信用卡"相关行为的入罪分析——以"伪造空白信用卡"为切入点

以"伪造空白信用卡"解释为"伪造信用卡"的方式将伪造空白信用卡的行为入罪并不妥当.未来立法对于伪造空白信用卡以及出售、购买、为他人提供伪造的空白信用卡等相关行为,应当以类似于"明知是伪造的空白信用卡而持有、运输,数量较大的"方式入罪.     

‘Domestic transnationalism’: legal advocacy for Mexican migrant workers' rights in Canada

Every year thousands of Mexicans travel to Canada to work in Canadian fields and greenhouses under the Mexico-Canada Seasonal Agricultural Worker Program. While the programme is often praised, it has also been the subject of persistent criticism about its failure to meet certain human rights standards. In this article, we examine the legal strategies civil society advocates of migrant workers have adopted to promote migrant workers' rights in Canada. Specifically, we examine legal struggles undertaken by the United Food and Commercial Workers union to challenge Ontario government legislation that does not permit collective bargaining by farmworkers in the province. We argue that this case demonstrates that despite the fact that many of the workers involved are transnationalized, appeals to international bodies or to international human rights standards have been of limited utility in promoting their rights. Despite frequent arguments about the increased relevance of international human rights and citizenship norms and transnational human rights advocacy, in this case the national and sub-national scales remain predominant. The result, we argue, is a form of ‘domestic transnationalism’, in which domestic political actors engage in advocacy within domestic legal institutions to promote the rights of a transnational mobile labour force.     

恶意透支型信用卡诈骗罪相关问题分析简

恶意透支型信用卡诈骗罪具有区别于传统型信用卡诈骗罪的显著特征和特有的犯罪构成要件。在犯罪主体上,其属于身份犯,信用卡申领人方具有犯罪主体资格,借用人不能单独构成该类型犯罪;恶意透支型信用卡诈骗罪非法占有目的的推定需要综合行为人的各种行为加以考察,不能客观归罪,也不能仅以发卡行催收后拒不归还来推定主观上的非法占有目的;发卡行催收行为的实施应自透支期限届满后以有效的方式能够确使申领人知晓为标准;行为人的透支数额不应包括其应支付的利息,对于行为人利用多张信用卡宴旒酌潘古行为苴潘古射枥酌计笪廊当i并行累加．     

The Law: An Engine for Trade

The lecture traces the process of commercialisation in English law from its early stages to the present day. Until the mid-eighteenth century the law was in a process of integration , overcoming a judicial preoccupation with technicalities and procedures to form a body of rules which merchants could trust. From that point on the law has assumed a proactive role as an engine for trade. The nineteenth century is marked by legal facilitation , where new institutions were fashioned as a robust commercial framework for the Industrial Revolution. From the end of that century to the present day business law has served to regulate , building a sensitive framework for commercial development that balances the needs of commerce with the needs of society as a whole.     

会计诚信缺失的新制度经济学透析及对策探讨

会计诚信缺失,最典型的问题是信息失真,而信息失真的表现形式是多样的,原因也是多方面的,这就为问题的解决带来了困难.新制度经济学中的契约经济学理论、交易成本理论、委托-代理理论和产权理论,能够帮助我们深入分析当前会计领域诚信缺失的动因,并针对这些原因提出重塑会计诚信的系统模型,进而探讨消除会计舞弊的对策.     

资产证券化项目融资模式的法律诠释

资产证券化是国际项目融资模式之一 ,是联系项目和资本市场的重要纽带。项目融资中的项目资产具有预期收入较为稳定和变现性较差等特征 ,该特征不利于项目资金的及时融通。而证券具有发达的市场、完备的法律制度、投资者广泛、风险分散、便于融资等特征。基于二者的互补性 ,产生了资产证券化的融资模式。首先 ,项目资产通过真实交易 ,转让给特殊目的公司 ,是实现项目资产证券化的前提 ;其次 ,通过信用提高等法律手段 ,可以弱化投资者对项目资产变现性较差特征的关注 ,满足证券法的有关要求 ,促进资产证券化的进行 ;第三 ,合理的税法制度是降低项目融资成本、促进项目资产和资本互动的重要法律杠杆 ,是资产证券化的重要保证。以上三个方面是从法律角度诠释资产证券化的重要内容 ,同时这三个方面互为影响 ,缺一不可     

“伪造空白信用卡”行为的刑法分析

通过《中华人民共和国刑法修正案(五)》,我国刑法对于涉及信用卡的犯罪规定有较大的修改和补充。对于伪造信用卡的伪造行为、使用行为、持有、运输等一系列行为都作了规定,但是,对于伪造空白信用卡的行为却态度不明。出罪还是入罪?在持有、运输伪造的空白信用卡都可能构成犯罪的情况下,伪造空白信用卡理应入罪。在没有刑法明文规定的前提下,入罪有违罪刑法定原则。     

Value Creation: A Coordination Game

Strategy in negotiation is often modeled as an activity involving the interplay of creating and claiming behaviors. Theorists have advanced differing perspectives on what game best describes the consequences of choosing one approach over the other. David Lax and James Sebenius offer the prisoner's dilemma game as a model, whereas Richard Walton and Robert McKersie's analysis is consistent with a version of a classic coordination game — namely, the game of “chicken.” This article revisits these two perspectives and shows that the Walton–McKersie view is applicable to a broad range of contexts. In particular, it demonstrates how what is commonly called the tension between creating value and claiming is better understood as the simple tension between a high‐risk and a low‐risk choice.