关于制定《国有企业企业家奖罚条例》的构想

缺乏一支高素质的企业家队伍是当前我国国有企业中遇到的一个严重问题,制定《国有企业企业家奖罚条例》,建立奖罚机制是培育优秀企业家的有效途径之一。《条例》的有效实行还具有推动现代企业制度建设,促进国有资产保值增值和企业技术进步,防止社会不正之风等意义。初步构想的《条例》应该由两两部分内容组成,即确定考核企业家业绩的客观准确的经济指标和具体的奖罚条款。     

对监听措施的法律建构

监听措施是世界各国为应付犯罪形势的变化而发展起来的一种高技术化、高隐密性的强制侦查措施,其出现对于侦查机关打击和惩罚犯罪发挥了极其重要的作用。作为一种重要的技术侦查手段,我国刑事诉讼法也应对其进行必要的规制,以确保在惩治犯罪的同时兼顾保护公民的基本权利。     

论法规批准制度

法规批准制度是指有关主体制定的法规范性文件需经特定主体的批准才能生效的法律制度。现行法规批准制度存在批准范围小、批准程序缺少操作性等不足。完善法规批准制度需合理设置批准范围、完善批准程序等,并对经批准的法规性质进行了法理考察。     

我国信用制度的确立与完善

不完善的信用制度已经成为影响我国经济发展和市场化进程的重要制约因素。我国信用制度完善的主要措施应当是:树立信用观念和信用意识;加强企业信用的构建;强化信用立法和执法,建立有效的信用规范体系;重建政府信用,树立行政权威;规范和加强政府对信用和信用管理行业的监督和管理;建立信用管理的民间机构,发展信用管理教育和理论研究等。     

关于制定我国《艾滋病防治条例》若干问题研究

近年来我国日益严峻的艾滋病形势要求必须尽快制定艾滋病防治条例。条例内容主要应包括立法目的、范围、防治方针与主管部门、预防与控制、检测与监测、治疗与救助、权利与义务、法律责任等。在制定条例时，应注意突出宣传教育、行为干预、自愿咨询检测、职业暴露等内容，以体现时代特点。     

我国公务员考核制度存在的问题及对策

《中华人民共和国公务员法》中公务员的考核制度存在诸多问题:比如考核标准过于笼统;没有解决考核内容,缺乏针对性;激励不显著;考核打乱了组织中的权责配置关系等。只有加强平时考核的力度,建立以绩效为核心的定期考核指标体系,加强考核工作的监督,公务员考核制度才可能得到进一步完善。     

论电子证据

电子证据是存储于特殊介质上用于证明案件真实情况的数据信息。它不同于传统的任何一种证据形式 ,具有高度精确性、复合性、脆弱性的特征。从学理和比较法的角度出发 ,在对电子证据的证据能力和证明力进行深入分析的基础上 ,我国应将电子证据列为证据法中的独立的证据形式。     

Regulatory Commitment to Negotiated Agreements: Evidence from the United States, Germany, The Netherlands, and France

Negotiated Agreements (NAs) are arrangements between firms and regulators in which firms voluntarily agree to reduce their pollution. This article analyzes the institutional features that facilitate or hamper the implementation of NAs. We illustrate the analysis with case studies on the implementation of NAs in the United States, Germany, the Netherlands, and France. We find that NAs are implemented when regulators are able to commit credibly to the objectives of NAs. Institutional environments marked by fragmentation of power and open access in policymaking reduce regulatory credibility and thus hamper the implementation of NAs.     

Moving towards EU membership and away from liberal democracy

ABSTRACT

The article concludes the Special Issue, Illiberal Politics in Southeast Europe, on the retreat of liberal democracy in the region. It focuses on the central themes that link all the papers together: free and fair elections, media freedom, judicial independence, privileged access to public resources and the role of civil society. It seeks to disentangle the causes and consequences of illiberal politics in the region and explores the similarities in the illiberal practices and strategies incumbents use with the aim of staying in power indefinitely. The main argument is that democratic backsliding in Southeast Europe is deeply rooted in the unfinished transitions of the 1990s, which gave rise to new political and economic elites and that blending those two into one resulted in the dominance of the executive over the judiciary and legislature. These new elites became entrenched during the wars and conflicts that affected the region. The enabling factors were of societal origin – clientelist practices, corruption, nepotism and mistrust in politics accompanied by external factors – as well as international pull and push factors (from the EU and Russia) along with a domino effect of democratic backsliding in the region.