“龙熊”共舞与经济转型——论影响中俄和平发展和互惠合作中的经济转型不彻底性

中俄的转型和发展需要中俄在世界经济舞台上实现”龙熊”共舞。深化经贸合作是两国实现崛起过程中的双赢选择。一个迅速工业化的中国需要稳定可靠的俄罗斯市场,一个日益强大的俄罗斯同样也需要参与中国这个世界上最庞大的潜在市场。在中俄两国几乎具备所有条件的情况下,经贸合作进展不尽人意的根本原因在于经济转型不彻底。然而,为实现共舞,当前两国应利用良好的政治关系,扩大深化经贸合作,完善经济转型。推动经济转型,完善市场建设,这不仅能消除影响双方经贸合作的基础性障碍,也是两国成功实现共同发展的必要步骤。     

儒家文化与经济发展关系的再审视

虽然传统儒学中包含着转化为有利于经济发展的作为新教伦理替代物的可能性因子,但是中国古代的制度安排显然阻碍了这种转化。而现代制度因素的引进和确立,在客观上割断了儒家文化与传统社会制度的亲和关系,不仅创造了一种排斥儒家文化中的不利因素而与有利因素相亲近的势态,而且也为儒家文化发生能够促进经济发展的创生性转换提供了契机。     

降解生物检材遗传标记检测的研究进展

降解生物检材遗传标记的检测一直是法医学实践和科研的难点。虽然PCR-STR分析技术能在一定程度上检测降解生物检材的遗传标记,但是对于某些高度降解的生物检材如骨骼、牙齿等的PCR-STR分型仍旧十分困难,存在不稳定性和分型异常现象。本文就近几年来PCR-STR分型技术在降解生物检材的法医实践中出现的问题和解决方法作一综述。     

解读环境法的“立法悖论”——以经济利益与环境利益的冲突为视角

我国现行环境法未能妥当地处理经济发展与环境保护之间的矛盾,以至出现法律法规频频出台但破坏环境的违法行为却屡禁不止的“立法悖论”。本文对社会经济活动引发环境问题这一事实背后所牵涉到利益纠葛作进一步地剖析,试图对两种利益再作均衡,以寻求环境立法悖论的解决之策。     

图们江地区开发与吉林省经济发展

吉林省经济发展要以珲春——图们江地区开发为龙头,带动龙头与龙身的协调发展,发挥对外开放优势,实现跨越式发展。     

Medicalization and social justice

Most social justice critiques of medical care focus upon the allocation of extant, but scarce, resources. In contrast to that focus, this article explores the preallocative arena of factors which shape the supply and availability of medical care. We identify four such factors: (1)medicalization — the tendency to regard as biologically caused various human problems which were in earlier eras ignored or attributed to other causes; (2)social inclusion — the bringing of economically deprived and socially marginal groups into participation in the medical care system; (3)biomedical transcendence — the elevation of biomedically derived concepts of human function into a social and personal world view; and (4)health absolutism — the ideology which holds individuals accountable for their own health and which, contrary to the thrust of the other factors, deemphasizes access and social equity for professionally provided medical care. While these forces all enhance the place of health as a social value, it is by no means certain that they will lead to a society which is more medically just. The article concludes with an appeal for critical analysis of the processes which shape both the medical care system and the broad social concern with medical care.     

自主与不自足经济社会情境中的经济法定位:“社会性”的解读

经济法被界定为“社会法”,对于“社会性”的解读构成理性认知经济法内在规定性、明智设计经济法制度、进而合理型塑经济社会生活的纽结。由于“社会性”实现机制的构设实为个体、社会和国家间制衡格局的构建,自由主义和福利国家论两大理论范式对经济法产生了共识和分歧。在上述两种理论范式的智识洞见和理论缺陷的基础上,商谈论范式的相关立场和主张将有助于对经济法“社会性”定位的理论重解和制度重构。     

Government accountability and voting choice in Italy, 1990–2008

Between 1996 and 2008 Italy has experienced four government alternations in as many consecutive elections. It could be argued that after the dramatic party change that occurred in the early 90s the Italian system is in a state of constant flux and voters appear rather bewildered. This paper presents an opposite argument, showing that voters' choice reflects the greater importance of valence politics – performance, the economy – acting as a cue to voting behaviour, interacting with a long-term political predisposition. In turn, this promotes parties' responsiveness and accountability since the overall performance of a government – even of a coalition government – appears as a goal to be shared by all partners, under the threat of defeat for all. The analysis is carried out employing the Italian National Elections Studies series.     

Voting when the economy goes bad,everyone is in charge,and no one is to blame: The case of the 2009 German election

The economy was a major issue in Germany’s 2009 election. The global economic crisis did not spare Germany, whose economy is tightly integrated into the global economy. So when the German economy experienced a historical shock, did voters connect their views of the economy with their vote choice? Or did they, as some research has suggested, recognize Germany’s dependence on global markets and cut the government slack, especially when the government consists of the country’s two major parties? Using pre- and post-election panel surveys from the German Longitudinal Election Study (GLES), we investigate the weight that voters gave to the economy, relative to other considerations, when casting their ballot and whether governing parties were disproportionately judged based on the state of the economy.     

Economic voting in a crisis: The Irish election of 2011

The paper explores a question raised by the 2011 Irish election, which saw an almost unprecedented decline in support for a major governing party after an economic collapse that necessitated an ECB/IMF ‘bailout’. This seems a classic case of ‘economic voting’ in which a government is punished for incompetent performance. How did the government lose this support: gradually, as successive economic indicators appeared negative, or dramatically, following major shocks? The evidence points to losses at two critical junctures. This is consistent with an interpretation of the link between economics and politics that allows for qualitative judgements by voters in assigning credit and blame for economic performance.