民族传统节日的共生、传承和转型--彝族赛装节个案研究

民族节日具有共生性.赛装节源起于农耕祭祀,随着人文环境的变迁而传衍和转型,不断由单一性向综合性、复合性演化,使神圣性萎缩而世俗性强化,并滚雪球式地融入了丰富的外来文化.     

基于博弈的企业合作机理和稳定性研究

本文以博弈论为分析工具，研究企业在一定制度环境下的合作机理，得出通过合理的制度安排可以促进企业间基于信任的合作关系的建立。在构建企业收益分配模型的基础上，本文论证了企业间内部约束机制对合作稳定性的保障和促进作用     

Battle in the name of privacy and security: A comment on Tencent vs. Qihoo (Supreme People's Court of China 2014)

One strategy for companies competing in Internet industries is to attack the privacy and security problems of products or services provided by a competitor and then to deliver remedial software to attract consumers. The recent ruling of the Supreme People's Court of China (SPC) establishes legal constraints on this strategy, recognising that a company owes a high duty of care when criticising the privacy and security policies of its competitors and identifying the line between legal technological innovation and unfair interference with the business of competitors. This article provides a summary of the background, facts and court conclusions as well as relevant comments on the impact of this judgement and identifies the issues that require further clarification.     

滥用市场支配地位行为对竞争的影响分析

滥用市场支配地位行为因具有严重的反竞争性而成为反垄断法规制的重要对象。依据行为的性质与目的不同,滥用市场支配地位行为可分为妨碍性滥用和剥削性滥用两大类,此两类滥用行为对竞争产生不同的影响。从滥用市场支配地位行为的具体表现形式看,主要包括掠夺性定价、瓶颈垄断、差别待遇、独家交易、搭售以及支配企业对包括供应商、顾客和最终消费者在内的各种交易相对人索取不合理的垄断暴利高价等;而各类中不同具体形式的滥用行为对竞争的影响也存在差异。     

保护竞争而不保护竞争者?——对主流反垄断法观点的审视

保护竞争而不是竞争者被奉为反垄断法的原则。受此影响,我国反垄断法的宗旨中并不包括保护竞争者。保护竞争而不是竞争者被误读,通过将其还原到原始文本之中、联系上下文来考察其真正含义后,并不能得出不保护竞争者的结论。从反垄断法的价值体系来看,保护竞争者和保护竞争属于不同层次的价值目标,二者并不矛盾。保护竞争而不是竞争者最初在审理企业并购案件中提出,即便在经营者集中制度中适用,也不能任意扩展到反垄断法的其他制度,因为从垄断协议和滥用市场支配地位制度来看,对竞争者的保护是其必然要求。     

社会主义市场经济应当确立什么样的产权基础

市场经济的微观基础不是某种既定的私有制,而是以权利可分割、可交换的个人所有权为基础的产权制度。市场经济是集中的封闭的所有制向分散的开放的所有制发展的必然结果。传统意义上的国有制是一个封闭性的所有制,是与市场经济不相适应的;国有企业作为一个经济组织应当退出竞争领域,但不等于国有经济也应当退出竞争领域,而是要改变国有经济的竞争方式。在社会主义市场经济条件下,建立起财产权利相互分离的、相互独立的个人产权,是国有企业改革的根本任务。     

刍议反倾销规则并入竞争法体系的几个问题

反倾销长期以来受到来自实务界和学术圈的广泛批评,针对反倾销规则的弊病存在改良说、废除说和取代说三种主要变革方案。取代说有一定的必要性和可行性,但可能面临一些障碍,应在认识将反倾销纳入竞争规则体系的必要性和可行性(即取代说)的基础上,设立在我国现行法律框架下统一进口产品和本国产品低价倾销规则的一些具体方法和途径。     

中国零售业应对WTO的对策分析

加入WTO之后,中国的零售业将面临前所未有的竞争。中国的零售业如何利用各种资源和优势条件,制定有效的应对策略,将成为竞争成败的关键。     

Electoral Risk and Redistributive Politics in Mexico and the United States

What strategy does a rational party follow in allocating discretionary expenditure? This article conceives redistributive politics as an investment strategy where expenditure allocations respond to electoral risk. To show the effects of risk, it provides evidence from Pronasol in Mexico and an analysis of New Deal spending in the United States. The analysis finds that the federal administrations in both countries responded to systematic electoral risk. Spending diversification into risky voters was a rational response to chances of losing elections. The analysis hence connects electoral volatility with redistributive spending.     

Eu merger control and the compatibility test:a review of recent developments

The compatibility test contained in Article 2 of the Merger Control Regulation (MCR) is at the very heart of EU merger control, for it determines whether a concentration with a community dimension is deemed compatible or incompatible with the common market. Incompatibility can lead to prohibition of a concentration, although this is rare. The paper reviews the recent developments to the conditions of the test itself as well as the analytical methods employed to determine compatibility. Concerning the former, the new foreseeable dominance interpretation, put forward by the European Commission and made law by the Court of First Instance (CFI), is explored. This new variant of the dominance condition is important on its own right but it is also of major interest because of the explicit legal requirement placed on the Commission to assess the future likelihood of abusive behaviour by the merging parties in its prospective analysis. This is not the case with the original dominance compatibility condition. The unexpected but important clarification by the CFI of the notion of substantial part of the common market, as contained in the express wording of the compatibility test, is also commented upon. Concerning the determination of compatibility, the Commission's controversial employment in certain conglomerate concentrations of the range effects of competitive harm theory is examined, as is the need to take cognisance of merger specific efficiencies when determining if a merger increases societal welfare. The EU is making progress toward such an efficiencies assessment as part of the compatibility determination. EU merger control – and hence the compatibility test – do not exist in a vacuum. The EU has played a major role in shaping the new multilateral architecture and its goal of increasing international convergence in competition matters. This in turn has led the EU to rethink the nature of the compatibility test. For example, it has sought to evaluate the dominance condition of the compatibility test with the substantial lessening of competition (SLC) approach used by some other regulators, like the US. The paper concludes by looking at a fundamental issue that has arisen from recent CFI judgements and the GE/Honeywell merger: the competence of the Commission, or more accurately the Merger Task Force (MTF), to carry out the compatibility determination. Proposals are outlined so as to ensure that the Commission's prospective analysis in a concentration case meets the requisite legal standard. It is essential for this standard to be met if EU merger control is to remain credible. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.