中国未来和平发展面临的主要制约因素

经过30年改革开放，中国的和平发展业已取得了辉煌成就。展望未来，中国的和平发展道路依然曲折而漫长，面临国际国内诸多制约因素，需要切实统筹内外两个大局，心中有数，真抓实干，迎难而上，为中华民族迎来全面复兴打下更加坚实的基础。     

“公私部门伙伴关系”模式下的开发区基础设施建设

开发区的建设在我国已经得到了蓬勃的发展,与此同时,其基础设施也正在逐步完善。开发区基础设施的完备程度直接决定了招商引资与产业孵化的效果,而基础设施的建设需要大量的资金投入。随着开发区数量和层级的不断提高,仅仅依靠政府自身的力量建设日显捉襟见肘。"公私部门伙伴关系"是公共部门与私营部门合作提供公共产品和公共服务的一种新模式,该模式在开发区基础设施建设领域的应用能弥补政府财政投入的不足,突破限制开发区自身发展的瓶颈。     

社会制度中的良善生活——马克思和杜威的伦理学构架

马克思和杜威的伦理学都强调道德是具体社会制度中的生活形式,这一观点既摆脱为伦理学寻求形而上学根源的困境,又指明了良善生活可能具有的内容。同时,社会制度包容不同的良善生活形式,认可了伦理价值的多元性;社会制度也排斥那些不道德的生活形式,它限定着良善生活的评价标准。     

美、日区域经济政策及其启示

区域经济发展不平衡是全世界普遍存在的问题,也是各国政府宏观调控的一个重要目标。美国、日本是世界上最发达的资本主义国家,但仍然存在区域经济发展不平衡问题,为此,美国和日本政府采取了多项措施,制定区域经济政策,以缩小区域发展差距。借鉴美国、日本的成功经验,对促进我国区域经济协调发展具有重要的意义。     

Strategic Standardization in Europe: A Public Choice Perspective

In October 1990, the EC Commission presented a Green Paper in which it outlined a New Approach to European standardization. In particular, standardization was interpreted as a means of furthering the completion of the Internal Market. This paper discusses the impact of the modifications to the process of standard setting, as they have been proposed by the Commission, with respect to the incentives and goals of the major players in the European standardization game, i.e., national and European standardization bodies, industry and the EC Commission. Selected economic models of standardization are applied to investigate the policy impact of the New Approach.     

经济危机、社会政策和经济发展:俄罗斯的经验

苏联解体之后,俄罗斯的社会政策保持了基本的连续性。尤其是叶利钦之后的俄罗斯,政府对社会保障和改善民生进行了巨大的投入,居民收入的增长和生活的改善非常明显。经济危机爆发之后,俄罗斯反危机政策更是赋予了社会政策以特别的使命,不仅缓解了危机的烈度,也起到了社会稳定器的作用。俄罗斯社会政策解决了国家长期发展需要面对的两个重要问题:一个是国家长期发展的人力资本积累问题,另一个是社会扩大再生产的可持续性问题。     

论以科学发展观指导高校学生党支部建设

加强和改进高校学生党支部建设，对夯实党的基层组织，培养社会主义事业的建设者和接班人，做好大学生思想政治工作等具有重要意义。深入贯彻落实科学发展观，加强和改进高校学生党支部建设的新内涵．以改革创新精神推进高校学生党支部建设。     

论新形势下的上海警辅队伍建设

警辅队伍在协助公安机关维护社会治安和公共秩序等方面发挥着十分重要的作用。上海各级公安机关需要积极争取地方党委政府的重视支持，积极推动警辅队伍向法治化、集约化、规范化、社会化方向发展，全面提升上海警辅队伍的整体素质和综合战斗力。     

More than bricks and sticks: Five components of community development corporation capacity

Abstract

Community development researchers, practitioners, and funders have recently begun to emphasize the need for community development corporations (CDCs) to build capacity. However, the practice of using the term capacity without carefully defining it allows for a wide range of meanings to be assigned to the term and hinders efforts to study and measure it. Capacity is often defined narrowly in terms of housing production, oversimplifying a complex concept and process.

To remedy this shortcoming, we create a framework that views capacity more broadly by dividing it into five components: resource, organizational, programmatic, network, and political. We believe that this more concrete way of thinking about capacity will be particularly useful to practitioners, funders, and policy makers. We apply our definitions to CDCs, particularly those that work with local intermediaries called community development partnerships (CDPs), in order to better understand the role of CDPs in the process of building capacity.     

Meeting the Offender Re-integration Challenge

In this article the author – member of the European Offender Employment Forum – gives his view on the problems of re-integrating ex-offenders. He describes the pan-European growth of the prison population, the vocational training offered in prisons and the demands of the labour market. He also discusses promising programmes and initiatives to counter the problems faced by ex-offenders. The 'solution' should be multi-dimensional, provide for continuity between pre-release and after-care and counter problems like employment, housing and finances. Governments must make it their business to ensure that the programmes they support are meeting the range of offenders' needs, are linking properly with the labour market and are providing continuity from sentence to community.