“关系型”强制动员——城市拆迁中私人关系网络的反向利用机制

城市拆迁引发了居民与地方政府之间的利益博弈,为了拆迁工作顺利开展,地方政府采用了间接动员的办法,通过运用行政权力驱使科层制内部的公职人员动员自己的亲属配合拆迁工作。这一动员过程是通过初始动员与次级动员两个阶段实现的,通过对私人之间强关系的反向利用,行政权力侵入私人关系网络,形成了强大的关系型动员强制机制。在公权力的作用下,私人关系网络由此被型塑成一种新的治理术。     

权力影响非分所得的制度防范

有效反腐必须善于发现、解决反腐中出现的新问题。权力影响非分所得是反腐中遇到的新问题,目前,权力影响非分所得的存在具有较大的社会危害性。造成这种现象的原因主要包括社会原因、体制原因、心理原因等。对此,需要在反腐斗争中针对新问题提出新对策。而有效防范权力影响非分所得需要综合运用市场运作手段、法律调整手段、从政伦理手段。     

善治与和谐——对政府治理视野下基本公共服务均等化“五W”模式的探讨

论文以政府治理为视角.尝试提出基本公共服务均等化的"五W"模式:即从"Who(实施的主体)、Whom(受益的对象)、What(实施的内容)、When(实施的时间)、Where(实施的地点)"五个方面具体分析公共服务均等化的内涵,认为政府治理的终极目标--善治与基本公共服务均等化在内涵上是一致的.论文在借鉴国外基本公共服务均等化经验的基础上,认为政府需要转变执政观念,加强社会管理与建设,遵循我国社会经济发展实际,因地制宜,确立不同区域公共服务均等化指标体系,逐步实现公共服务均等化,促进社会和谐发展.     

COMBATING HEALTHCARE COST INFLATION WITH CONCERTED ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS IN A CHINESE PROVINCE

This article defies the traditional notion that cost inflation in healthcare could hardly be curbed without the significant revision of economic incentive scheme, but demonstrates the possibility of containing cost inflation with concerted administrative actions in the Chinese context. It examines the case of Fujian Province that embarked on a health bureaucracy‐led policy reform without an alteration of economic levers but mainly using administrative tools to combat cost escalation. Through clearly defined, well designed, targeted and concerted administrative measures, effective cost containment is attainable in China's healthcare sector, at least in the short run. If combined well with the powerful economic instruments, administrative tools would be able to augment their effects in cost containment, provided with the government's possession of hospital ownership. At the heart of Fujian's case are the reassertion of the government stewardship, the reconstruction of the collapsed accountability mechanisms, the reconfiguration of policy instruments, and the revision of administrative incentives, rather than the decreased costs per se. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

邓小平执政党建设思想探究

社会主义国家执政党建设直接关系到社会主义国家的兴衰荣辱，成败得失，党的十一届三中全会以来，邓小平作为党的第二代领导集体的核心，在领导改革开放，进行社会主义现代化建设过程中，创立和不断丰富了中国特色的社会主义理论，其中包含着内容丰富的执政党建设理论。     

公共政策对社会公正的保障机制探析

公共政策作为政府实施公共管理的有效手段和方式，一直以来就是政府实施社会管理的有效工具。政府通过政策实现社会公正，更好的服务于人类美好生活的目的。然而良好的生活愿景不能自发的达成，社会公正的理想需要现实中公共政策的支撑。没有良好的政府政策，社会的发展与进步，社会公正的价值追求恐难实现。从公共政策中的权力、目标与工具这三个公共政策实现社会公正的路径出发，探寻如何运用公共政策来保障和实现社会公正。     

公共政策手段的类型及其比较分析

公共政策手段是公共政策方案中引导或促使政策目标群体采取期望行为的具体措施。按照其发挥作用的机理 ,公共政策手段可分为三类 :规制手段、经济手段和宣传教育手段 ,它们包括多种具体形式。三类政策手段的效果不同 ,适用的条件也不同。它们各有长处 ,也各有其局限。在制定公共政策时 ,不应盲目地偏爱某一类政策手段 ,而应根据具体条件和情况在分析比较的基础上加以选择。     

论民主制度与党的领导方式执政方式的法律化

党的十六大报告指出,发展社会主义民主政治,最根本的是要把坚持党的领导、人民当家作主和依法治国有机统一起来。这种有机统一的表现方式就是在坚持党的领导的前提下,将社会主义民主政治制度化、法律化以及使党的领导方式和执政方式法律化,全面贯彻依法治国方略。     

唐诗中西域民族音乐文化研究

唐诗中西域民族音乐文化的研究有助于我们理解魏晋南北朝期间西域民族的民族特征,也有利于我们从历史维度的视角加深对少数民族文化的认知以及理解。西域少数民族文化在魏晋南北朝时期传入中原,这种文化也表征于唐诗中,集中彰显了唐诗中的西域乐器文化以及西域舞蹈文化。西域文化对于唐朝诗人创作热情的激发以及对于其形象思维的唤醒具有重要意义,其诗歌意象与文化历史载体记录不仅彰显了西域特质,也凸显民族融合的恢弘进程。     

Governance modes,policy regimes and operational plans: A multi-level nested model of policy instrument choice and policy design

Policy goals and means exist at different levels of abstraction and application and policies can be seen to be comprised of a number of components or elements, not all of which are as amenable to (re)design as others. Defining and thinking about polices and policy-making in this way is very useful because it highlights how policy design is all about the effort to match goals and instruments both within and across categories. That is, successful policy design requires (1) that policy aims, objectives, and targets be coherent; (2) that implementation preferences, policy tools and tool calibrations should also be consistent; and (3) that policy aims and implementation preferences; policy objectives, and policy tools; and policy targets and tool calibrations, should also be congruent and convergent. Policy instrument choices can thus be seen to result from a nested or embedded relationship within a larger framework of established governance modes and policy regime logics. In this contextual model, the range of choices left at the level of concrete targeted policy instrument calibrations—the typical subject of policy tool analysis—is restricted by the kinds of decisions made about policy objectives and the appropriate tools to attain them, and both of these, in turn, by the kind of choices made at the highest level setting out general policy aims and implementation preferences.