经济适用房存在的必要性分析——基于福利经济学与人性假设理论的解释

运用福利经济学、人性假设理论，对经济适用房实现资本循环、拉动内需等方面的作用进行论述；运用人性假设理论，对住房保障对象的心里需求进行分析。经济适用房能够实现在为保障对象提供社会住房福利的同时，使投资于福利事业的结果给社会带来更大的收益；并且充分尊重和保护了保障对象的福利选择权益。因此经济适用房是我国住房保障体系中不可或缺的一部分。     

承租人房屋优先购买权的制度缺陷及理论重构——从法释（2009）11号司法解释谈起

法释（2009）11号司法解释对承租人房屋优先购买权作了进一步规定,但并未对承租人房屋优先购买权进行定性,也未能实质上保护优先购买权,另外“同等条件”和“合理期限”的规定仍然模糊。承祖人房屋优先购买权应属附延缓条件的能够引起物权变动关系的形成权,且以是否进行了预告登记为标准,或具有物权属性或具有债权属性。同等条件应确定为相对同等的条件,还应该对出租人出卖房屋的通知期限和承租人优先购买权的行使期限进行具体规定。     

《国有土地上房屋征收与补偿条例》第25条分析

《国有土地上房屋征收与补偿条例》的颁行改变了《城市房屋拆迁管理条例》实施期间的法律关系主体结构,政府作为征收一方直接与被征收人发生法律联系。该条例第25条所规定的房屋征收补偿协议宜认定为行政合同,该条第2款有关规定实质上设立了一种新的行政合同履行纠纷的解决方式。不过,该条规定的实施受到了现行《行政诉讼法》的限制。新的行政合同履行纠纷解决方式是否真正建立,有待进一步论证。     

第一次反“围剿”胜利与毛泽东人民战争思想

中央苏区第一次反＂围剿＂战役的胜利与人民战争思想有着密切的关系。红军之所以确定＂诱敌深入＂为第一次反＂围剿＂战役的战略方针,其主要目的就是要战略退却到根据地内腹心地域,依靠根据地内有利的人民和地理条件来改变敌强我弱的对比,充分依靠人民群众,实行人民战争,最终打败敌人的＂围剿＂。中央苏区第一次反＂围剿＂战役的胜利就是毛泽东人民战争思想的胜利。     

Twentieth Century Benchmark Dates inInternational Relations:The Three World Wars in Historical Perspective *

This paper builds on the author’s earlier work on benchmark dates inInternational Relations. The Introduction summarises this work and explains howthis paper extends the analysis from suggestions made, but not developed, in earlierpublications. The second section looks in detail at 20 th century benchmark dates centredon the three world wars (First, Second and Cold). It argues that the changes clusteredaround the Second World War are both deeper and more extensive than those clusteredaround either the First World War or the Cold War. The third section uses theseinsights to open-up a macro-historical perspective on the 20 th century, demonstratingthe ways in which choices in relation to both time and scale affect the constructionof macro-historical perspectives. The fourth section demonstrates the advantages ofa two-century perspective on the 20 th century. Here, and in the conclusion, we arguethat the key issues that underpinned world politics in the 20 th century are best seen asthe downstream consequences of the dynamics and challenges ushered in by the 19 thcentury “global transformation.”     

博客时代的言论自由及其法律规制——以美国苹果公司商业秘密案为例

以苹果公司商业秘密案为例，通过对该案中双方的主要诉争所在、圣克拉拉县高等法院和加州第六上诉法院缘何做出不同判决及各自判决书背后的论证理由等方面的分析，展示美国言论自由保护传统方面的有关特点，并为我国博客环境下言论自由的法律规制提供一些借鉴之处。     

论我国现行住房政策体系的缺陷及其矫正

随着住房体制改革的不断深化与房地产市场的逐步活跃，我国的住房政策体系的基本框架已经成型，但由于种种原因，我国现行住房政策体系尚存在着诸多缺陷与不足。因此，只有采取相应的措施加以矫正，才能保证我国房地产市场的健康持续发展。     

出租房屋承租人优先购买权法律问题之探讨

出租房屋承租人的优先购买权 ,必须具备实质条件和形式条件才能行使。以一次性付款方式条件下的价格界定“同等条件” ,才能真正体现公平交易 ;承租人优先购买权的性质 ,是法律、行政法规创设的一项财产请求权 ,而非实质意义上的物权。承租人以行使优先购买权为名而提起的恶意之诉 ,不应得到人民法院的支持     

Prevail or perish: Anglo-German naval competition at the beginning of the twentieth century

Abstract

British politicians often argued that Britain maintained its navy only in order to secure its own survival by keeping sea communications open, while Germany in no real need of a powerful navy, threatened this legitimate British policy-goal by pursuing expansionist politics. German leaders, emboldened and a little dazzled by the tremendous industrial and economic success of the newly unified Reich, held that Britain was maintaining its economic dominance in the Empire by military means and thus blocking the progress Germany hoped to make in its aspiration to parity status and economic prosperity, with all that that entailed. This paper will explore the underlying rationale of the arms race between Britain and Germany shining through in those different positions on legitimate (military) policy aims. It will go beyond the visible symbols, as it were, of the Dreadnought and the Two-Power standard. These very concrete matters will also be dealt with here but, more importantly, this essay is meant to give some answer as to whether an archetypal differentiation between survival on the one hand and domination on the other can be made out as the predominant logic that led the two countries to embark on the road to the Great War.     

A Roadmap for CANS Validation

In nearly every jurisdiction, juvenile or family courts will be using the Child and Adolescent Needs and Strengths (CANS) tool to assess whether children can safely be treated in family-like settings to meet federal Family First Prevention Services Act (FFPSA) requirements. Yet, a number of peer-reviewed publications have raised serious concerns regarding the lack of CANS validation research. Rather than reject CANS, this article provides a roadmap for validating the tool with data that jurisdictions have already collected. Courts should require these three simple analyses before relying on the assessment.